This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pwnator
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 364
281
« on: September 21, 2016, 10:21:34 AM »
dat tail tho
Would probably prefer beefier claws, but dayum that looks so good
282
« on: September 15, 2016, 11:23:33 AM »
is the stack even worth it? a black's more powerful and allows for an even larger chassis for stability
283
« on: September 15, 2016, 12:42:00 AM »
ayt the rear assembly on the first one is badass
I would probably prefer the tread wedges on the IRL version to be covered and aligned with the flipper, and you have the weight to do so since you're using Pl 10 anyway.
Not quite sure if the top flipper's doing anything, though.
284
« on: September 13, 2016, 11:44:49 PM »
My best guess about the missing 3 kg is in the chassis height.
285
« on: September 13, 2016, 10:33:40 AM »
Maybe then you can upgrade the drive to RADs or something.
what
286
« on: September 11, 2016, 02:01:57 PM »
rofl i didnt know what i expected  398.2, plastic. As a consequence of forcing a fully static setup, the extender work is appalling. But the reason it's terrible is just a combination of slow turning, slow weapon swing, tiny area of impact, and no recovery after being flipped. and i still can't find the right setup for mud tires >:X
287
« on: September 11, 2016, 11:20:40 AM »
Isotope is probably the cleanest of the trio. Something about the MW is throwing me off. It's probably the disconnect between the frame and the chassis. Was expecting 2 discs for the HW but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
288
« on: September 11, 2016, 09:47:16 AM »
Not sure where he could spend the extra weight, though. With a fully static setup, the best case would probably be a very lucky weapon breaker stack into the plow. At least with the snapper, the RADs spin slightly faster.
289
« on: September 10, 2016, 11:37:27 AM »
dat chassis shape kreygasm
any hw rebuild that results with a bigger bot is almost always better
and really diggin the mace arrangement
290
« on: September 10, 2016, 08:18:35 AM »
Why are you using Fireman axes exactly?
Because Mud Runner. Would've used the wheels as well if I could find the weight and the proper motor height for it. Also, stability isn't the problem. It literally can't turn. You would occasionally encounter this problem on tiny HSes, where the solution is usually a complete rebuild. I'll try to find another setup that isn't unstable, most likely static.
291
« on: September 09, 2016, 02:15:20 PM »
Jupiter's actually pretty stable. The closest you could get it to Havok is if you knock off a motor. also why you gotta ruin my moment with a better hammer man  I was disappointed that all of the MW hammers in ReStocked were double-wedged, and I was already done with the chassis before Geice showcased A COOLER AND MUCH BETTER BOT GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Turns out it would've barely been an upgrade to the current Mud Runner. It can't turn, it would spazz out on heavy contact, and fires too slowly. Might have to resort to a completely static setup as both Bushido and Iceberg were pretty tiny.
292
« on: September 09, 2016, 07:02:11 AM »
wtf man i was just about to showcase one soon as i finish it
Is the snapper anchor exostacked? Looks pretty far out.
293
« on: September 09, 2016, 03:04:31 AM »
AS objectively has the best husbando here.
294
« on: September 08, 2016, 10:57:21 AM »
eh  Took another whack at the rebuild, somehow made it look even more generic. It's basically REVENGE with wedges. As for the Jupiter rebuild rebuild:  2 blacks, 24 irons (2 irons each on 4 flails, the rest static). Shreds most 2WD bots, still somewhat weak vs 4WD (it basically loses when it gets pinned as it has no recovery at all), but I guess that's the whole gist of the bot. Kinda proud of the drive setup, so yay. also stock flails in 2016 LUL
295
« on: September 06, 2016, 10:27:23 AM »
trying to rebuild some of my older bots but im still rusty  My attempt at rebuilding my old T-400 rebuild. I thought I was able to give it 4 birds with 3 razors each, then halfway through the build I realized I'm ~60 kgs off my estimate FeelsBadMan. Oh well, didn't want the chassis to go to waste anyway. But yeah, still mediocre. I have some other ideas for this, but I don't think I'll be able to retain its T-silhouette. Gonna find a way to rebuild my old Jupiter rebuild as well.
296
« on: September 04, 2016, 07:27:15 PM »
You could extend the rear part of the chassis further so you can rotate the HPZs properly.
297
« on: September 04, 2016, 07:24:03 PM »
You don't need the side BAs anyway. AT MOST you'll need 2 BAs and a SnapperII in the middle for 3-4 racks. It will be more generic, though.
298
« on: September 04, 2016, 10:59:28 AM »
ayy lmao 13 months since last bot FeelsBadMan holy crap grog's chassis triggers me so much it's off center and weighs more than a bw wtf So this is what came out when I tried to maximize space:  2 blacks, basically feels like clockwork hydra with half the punch so preeeetty terribad  796, tons of empty space but I think this produces the most combat potential from 612 kg. 1 black and 1 nifty. Tentatively the entry for Stock Scramble unless I can find a better setup.
299
« on: September 03, 2016, 07:18:14 AM »
That's a shame. The original looked quite nice. I was just expecting you to find a way to push the whole setup inwards so you can attach the drive to 20cms coming out of the main extenders.
But I guess it's kinda hard to scavenge 7kg out of nowhere. That and your chassis is pretty tight as is.
300
« on: September 03, 2016, 05:57:19 AM »
holy crap i have forgotten how triggering it is to build with a horizontally off-center chassis
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 364
|
Show Posts