261
Tournament Archives / Re: RAW 2 Brackets and Videos
« on: May 11, 2010, 09:17:32 PM »
Nice....
Thanks, Sage.
Thanks, Sage.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 261
Tournament Archives / Re: RAW 2 Brackets and Videos« on: May 11, 2010, 09:17:32 PM »
Nice....
Thanks, Sage. 262
Tutorials and Tips / Re: AI-ing (.py files, coding, R+D, and help)« on: May 11, 2010, 08:54:26 PM »
Badnik, if you want it fixed pronto, then compress and link your AI directory.
If not then it's your call... 263
Site News and Feedback / Re: Spelling« on: May 11, 2010, 08:19:50 AM »
Vus leis guys fracnaise ne sias pas coment epleer...
Parlementz~vus anglias? I does... I no sever all dial ects.. If'n we put a slepl checkir on GMT, thin weed in Abel peeple two nut loin stuff. 264
Chatterbox / Re: Thinking about leaving« on: May 10, 2010, 07:04:50 PM »
I think of leaving too, sometimes, due to time constraints though... But the game is fun, and I'd miss many here....
BTW: Funny how Sparkey could be blamed as the cause of someone leaving,... but a female who also posts useless posts, from the very same addiction to attention,(even greater than Sparkey) is enabled, and begged to stay... ![]() Women are smarter than men here: She knows how to push male buttons. It's quickly becoming a matriarchal society.... Though I hope not, she will most likely 'Do you guys, and then Diss you guys'. And you won't have a clue as to how you were just exploited..... (Please do not mention this text and leave the above invisible please if quoted). Mad. 265
Tutorials and Tips / Re: AI-ing (.py files, coding, R+D, and help)« on: May 10, 2010, 06:26:03 PM »
When does it crash; start up, selecting a team, or bot,....?
Right off, Badnik, I can't see anything obvious with those lines. RAR and upload your whole AI directory, and I'll help you out. I might suggest to you and all that when modding the game to save yourselves from any trouble: 1. make a BU. 2. change only one thing at a time, then test; this way you know what is wrong. 266
Discussion / Re: RedDrum« on: May 10, 2010, 02:21:39 PM »
Jade, you could just mod a present gmf's vertices to get a drum weapon..., maybe move the AP(s) too.
267
Chatterbox / Re: toAst RANT THREAD!!« on: May 10, 2010, 07:44:51 AM »
Wow,... really?!? Why I never.....
Well, coincidentally, I was talking with Joe, and it's weird,... but the more we spoke to each other the worse toAst became... Because as our discussion "toAst actually planned, set-up, and executed the Oklahoma City bombing, Columbine and 9-11" ![]() And it gets worse.... He actually said something bad about..... Taco Bell! ![]() People like this are mentally unstable!!!!....They should not be allowed to live!!!!" ![]() *Goes and pops a few Ritalins* 268
Chatterbox / Re: SPARKEY RANT THREAD !« on: May 09, 2010, 10:32:48 PM »If you guys don't give this kid a break, I swear to climb up your dsl cables, set your faces on fire and put it out with an axe. He's a ****ing 12 year old kid.Rolo, Sparkey's had several chances extended to him, and at times not followed through as he said, like controlling his anger,.. though I think he's made some improvement. As far as Naryar, Sparkey seems to bother certain members more than others, and it appears that Naryar is one of them. He's has a right to express his opinion, as Sparkey did about me, or as you just did about Naryar... Big pic: Avalanche was my and K-3's responsibility.... Sparkey's in the hands of ACAMS, so everything here is really his call. 269
Discussion / Re: GTM Con« on: May 09, 2010, 02:18:15 PM »It's OK, Serge.I would be fine with ACAMS putting ads on GTM to raise money to get people to be able to come. We could open a signups and maybe limit it to like 20 notable people We are 'special', for we have been designated 'ETC.'s,... "Extra Talented Coders",.....according to,... errr,... 270
Chatterbox / Re: toAst RANT THREAD!!« on: May 09, 2010, 01:54:47 PM »
Uh oh..., ACAMS is on ya. You is in trouble.
Toast,.... you are toast! *Huh???... Wha?* But it's still true...(formal logic). (Welcome back, toAst.) 271
Chatterbox / Re: SPARKEY RANT THREAD !« on: May 09, 2010, 01:41:57 PM »
Nar, I appreciate and can relate with your 'rantz' about Sparks, but there's no need to defend me ....
Let me share a bit of very liberating insight: Words are just a MEANS to hopefully communicate information about reality. Words are symbolic noises or letters that together merely 'represent' certain parts of reality. The words are NOT that part of reality (thing/person) but only a right (or wrong) representation of he/she/it/you. It's like drawing a picture to represent something real, for communicating an idea. The picture is not the actual thing, just a symbol of it (accurate or not accurate). Words are only a mere 'representation'... Words are really only a means of communicating, and when written, they only affect the ink on a paper, or when spoken, only vibrate the air . I.e.: I can say "The sky is blue!", but just because I said it (1) doesn't mean my words are accurate; nor (2) do my words make the sky blue. The sky is what it is, whether or not I speak this or that,.... or at all, it doesn't change or affect reality; but only might 'describe' it. Another example: Next time you're at an intersection, just declare "There is no car coming!"... and then brainlessly pull out. Why don't we do this? Because words do not 'create' reality, but can only 'describe' it. So when people say things to you all they're doing is vibrating the air, nothing more; and the words in and of themselves should have no effect on you. Now if the words communicated DO describe reality, then you should, and need, to respond to the real problem that needs to be dealt with. But here still, you're not responding to the words, but to the part of reality you were just made aware of. And if the words do not describe reality, then there is nothing to respond to.... Except maybe to help that person who is (knowingly or unknowingly) not it touch. So when communicating, listen objectively to discern if what they're saying is accurate. If so then thank them, and respond to the actual issue. Else just go on,... for 'nothing' happened. Because we're so impulsive and don't consistently think things through clearly, we brainlessly accept or reject others words, and end up being controlled by reacting to myth thrown out by others specifically designed to get me to 'react' to their words, instead of reality. This is called interrelational 'baggage'. Thus they 'play' with me,.. and that is their goal,... but my fault that they found a foot-hold in my own lack of mental maturity. Flame wars would not work without this brainless reacting. I watch some here cast out little 'bait-words', just like a fishing line, to see who they can reel in and play with... as though people are 'things' to play with. I've seen this particular 'brainless reaction to words' in myself, and so I share with those interested here to check for this, and to encourage and facilitate people to think and respond to reality using their own faculties rightly/soberly, instead only reacting at the level or mark of a beast. Sorry for any type-O's.. This is a short, user-friendly synopsis of a lecture I give on Social Psychology, that anyone can understand if they're willing to... ----------------- Sparkey's paradigm/view of self is built and therefore dependent upon the 'words' of others. I call it ASD (Attention Seeking Disorder). You can see how like an alcoholic, he constantly 'lusts' for words of affirmation (compliments). That's because like a drink/drug, the words are only a 'buzz' for him to synthetically 'feel' good for a moment, while reality is unchanged. Thus he must return for more (addiction). And so it is with any way of playing with reality (myth). Therefore, like a drunk using a bottle, when someone responds by telling him what he wants to hear, Sparkey will maintain his 'useful' relationship with that person (his bottle). "Little brown jug, how I love thee." But when the same person does NOT say what he wants to hear, then like a drunk would an empty bottle, he throws it away (maybe even angry at it), and then looks for another to replace it. And so it is with any of us. An important addition: It should also be noted that this 'pretend world'/myth, that he is so addictively enslaved to, also gives others a 'foot-hold' to play with him by just telling him certain supportive or non-supportive words. Anyone for fishing? Having shared a bit, I hope now there's nothing (ignorant) out there to catch... 272
Tournament Archives / Re: BTTB - Signups« on: May 07, 2010, 07:31:34 AM »Quote from: GK The arena will be my Twiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisted Arena. Help on getting it to work with a .bmp map to give it more than plain colour would be greatly appreciated.If you still need help here, let me know... 273
Tournament Archives / Re: AW AAM + BFE tourney?« on: May 06, 2010, 11:37:20 PM »
This is possible, Duck, but it'll be hard to regulate.
Some other problematic examples not mentioned above: 1. You could have your weapons start the game right in front of your opponent. ![]() 2. You could raise the chassis above the floor and leave the wheels and weapons down where they need to be for fighting. 3. You could shrink your chassis down to smaller than a 20cm extender. 4. I learned how to make the bot chassis invisible. Hehe... 5. One could move any motor, weapon, wheel, armor, etc. anywhere. So you just need to set well-thought-out parameters... 274
Tournament Archives / Re: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger (Tournament Idea)« on: May 06, 2010, 11:16:40 PM »
Agree with Joe's assessment.
But sounds interesting, RR. Looking forward to hearing the details. 275
Chatterbox / Re: Sorry guys.« on: May 06, 2010, 11:07:18 PM »MAD YOU NAILED THE MOTHER FRICKING PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!! That is, Flying off the handle, cause I just did it and you just simply stated the facts. ...... I should 'think through' what people say instead of just 'reacting' against it,.. sometimes proving their point. This way, more than just my body will mature... Thanks, Mad.That's the idea.... Smart dude. 276
Chatterbox / Re: TX Q&A« on: May 06, 2010, 07:25:22 AM »I cant drive, And im pretty ill so i aint going outside...Sorry, TX. Is it a short thing or a chronic issue...? 277
Discussion / Re: GTM Con« on: May 06, 2010, 06:40:10 AM »
S_R, you live in/near New England? Huh.
Somebody, I didn't know you were up this way either....(ain't never had to look at your IP address, cause you ain't never done no trouble makin'; so my ignorance is your fault ![]() Edit: Wait, I'm an "Etc."? ![]() 278
Discussion / Re: GTM Con« on: May 05, 2010, 10:47:04 PM »
As I remember, K-3, JD, and I live pretty close to each other.
ROBO, here's a recent pic off of my night-security cam: ![]() 279
Chatterbox / Re: Sorry guys.« on: May 05, 2010, 10:12:51 PM »He said STFU to Joe and threw random < bovine buttock biscuits :) > insults at me for months, I deserve an apology two, I'll apologise if he does.Sparks, you fly off the handle all of the time (just like now) whenever you feel like it... May I ask how often you apologize to those you treat badly in your bursts of anger? SF, owned and is dealing with his error.... ![]() ... < bovine buttock biscuits :) > ....You mean Mad.... 280
Contests / Re: Vote BOTM May 2010« on: May 05, 2010, 09:34:10 PM »
Yep, me too.... But, Time is NOT on my side, right now.
|