This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - GoldenFox93
2201
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:26:35 PM »
*Checks that thread is in Junkyard*
**** YEAH, SPARKLE SPARKLE SPARKLE
2202
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:04:08 PM »
5. No more 2.3 grip wheels. Grip ranges from 0.8 - 1.2 (except for treads which have 0.6).
Wait... so treads have the least amount of grip? 
From looking, it seems- that would also mean that Caterpillar Tracks would be the slowest form of locomotion, even though you can get fast tracked robots.
2203
« on: April 02, 2012, 11:05:52 AM »
@Jonz wouldn't you and GF93 would both be on the EU team?
Yeah, we would. He's Finnish, I'm English, so why not?
2204
« on: April 02, 2012, 11:01:58 AM »
Ah, right. So no Jonzy-whacking for me if gets too laggy, then?
2205
« on: April 02, 2012, 10:58:19 AM »
Haha we should totally make our own lulzy highlander (9v9) team. It'd be boss.
Hypothetical situation, what class would you be on the team if we made one?
Pyro, for me. I'll be great for ambushing opponents, helping to destroy Sentries around corners, and finding and flushing out Spies.
and I will be enjoying to backstab you all the time... 
Hold it, aren't we supposed to be on a team? Could be mistaken.
2206
« on: April 02, 2012, 10:55:54 AM »
Haha we should totally make our own lulzy highlander (9v9) team. It'd be boss.
Hypothetical situation, what class would you be on the team if we made one?
Pyro, for me. I'll be great for ambushing opponents, helping to destroy Sentries around corners, and finding and flushing out Spies.
2207
« on: April 01, 2012, 08:04:30 PM »
 Looks like I win 
2208
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:41:01 PM »
Typically, I can understand that. But it's a bit of a sensitive topic for me- only had it since last May, you see.
Ah, I see.
Anyway, why are you on GTM at 1:40 am?
Because I've lost control of my life.
2209
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:36:28 PM »
Demolisher. It took a while to get this shape right. It flips over rather easily.
(Image removed from quote.)
Sweet. I love how you rendered the angular chassis.
2210
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:33:09 PM »
All right, my comments are back! =D
...still 65% Warn, though. On the bright side, it's an improvement over earlier.
Welcome back! And be careful this time.
Thanks mate- I plan to  Maybe a snarky comment or two here or there, but nothing too serious, of course  For threatening to kill kill if he didn't remove his ban. Or something along those lines. Then doing a u-turn when he found out kill was the one who banned him. Either way kill permabanned him, which was probably the right thing to do.
Agreed. Normally I'm not one to bear grudges, but I'll never forgive him for those comments he made relating to my Diabetes.
Nothing said on the internet should be taken seriously. These things should be ignored and forgotten as soon as possible, in my opinion. Not worth getting angry over. Typically, I can understand that. But it's a bit of a sensitive topic for me- only had it since last May, you see.
2211
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:26:07 PM »
He found me on facebook... then I blocked him...
If I could +1 you right now...
2212
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:20:24 PM »
For threatening to kill kill if he didn't remove his ban. Or something along those lines. Then doing a u-turn when he found out kill was the one who banned him. Either way kill permabanned him, which was probably the right thing to do.
Agreed. Normally I'm not one to bear grudges, but I'll never forgive him for those comments he made relating to my Diabetes.
2213
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:18:44 PM »
All right, my comments are back! =D
...still 65% Warn, though. On the bright side, it's an improvement over earlier.
2214
« on: March 31, 2012, 01:56:59 PM »
I might stop it there, GF. But I agree that 65% warn for swearing is too far. Most members, I imagine are competent enough to not lace every post with a barrage of expletives. One instance in one post shouldn't warrant that level of warn at all. If someone was to go curse crazy, they could be warned accordingly. One rude word in one post, I feel, should be 10% at the absolute most. Granted that trolls, flame wars and such aren't as prevolent as it used to be, but that doesn't necessarily mean we can shift the main focus onto something much less important.
65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. What are their priorities again?
In all fairness, you did it twice, and their rules are rather strict about swearing anywhere other than Junkyard. If it's Junkyard, not a single **** is given, outside of Junkyard, you will be crushed with a fist of [enter material here], or in the case of Naryar, material is irrelevant, and the fist is 'MIGHTY'.
Overly, might I add. I could understand if it was concentrated only towards the actual RA2 sections, but in the Movies and Music bit? That had nothing to do with anything.
Hmm...true enough, considering what I think the system is at the moment (X% warn where X is dependent on the word said), it probably shouldn't be more than something like...25%-35% tops, I would think. Unless of course they are just trying to be as brutal as possible to stop people from doing it (maybe they got bored of how much it happened before, but that is just uneducated speculation on my part)...alternatively, it could be based on who issued the warn, but that is yet more speculation.
Then again, I have seen people swear outside of Junkyard (without stars) and get away with it before now, so I really don't know how they work. All I know is that the warning is fair the percentage could be seen as unfair dependent on who you are (and what you compare the offence(s) to), and you may be able to get it reduced through appeal, or it may just anger them into increasing it by 30% (or 34% if they are feeling particularly evil)...and that insulting them out of Playground may make him just increase the warn/ban you outright.
That's what really pisses me off about this sort of thing, people getting a far more lenient sentence than others for the same offense, for reasons which aren't relevent to the problem at all. Rules are RULES, not flexible guidelines, and apply to EVERYONE. No-one bar no-one should be above them.
Exactly, I think I'll stop then.
2215
« on: March 31, 2012, 01:43:55 PM »
65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding.
Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?
insulting acams probably wont help
What's he going to do about it? It's not like the racist, homophobic sack of crap does much moderating that's actually useful.
2216
« on: March 31, 2012, 01:33:18 PM »
I still don't think swearing should warrant such a high level of warn. There are MUCH worse things a member can do.
Exactly. Somehow, one instance of it is far worse than anything on here. That's why I consider ACAMS' backwards "Frontier Justice" to be so corrupt. He blatantly ignores problems that need sorting out, yet is all to happy to come down like a ton of bricks on someone for swearing once to make himself look like a hero. 65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. What are their priorities again?
In all fairness, you did it twice, and their rules are rather strict about swearing anywhere other than Junkyard. If it's Junkyard, not a single **** is given, outside of Junkyard, you will be crushed with a fist of [enter material here], or in the case of Naryar, material is irrelevant, and the fist is 'MIGHTY'.
Overly, might I add. I could understand if it was concentrated only towards the actual RA2 sections, but in the Movies and Music bit? That had nothing to do with anything.
2217
« on: March 31, 2012, 01:20:35 PM »
65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding.
Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?
2218
« on: March 31, 2012, 07:17:22 AM »
Like when starscream was beaten by a freaking pony.
Actually, there was legitimate reason for that. As much as I like G1 Starscream (I tend to see him as the Decepticon equivalent of Naryar), I think it was his comparatively slower speed (as fast as he may be in Transformer terms with his alternate form), lack of agility, poor aim (If he'd got even a few good hits in with any of his more powerful weapons, such as his Minigun or Missiles, it would've been the end of Dash on the spot) and his own scheme backfiring on him that put him out of commission there. And on the bright side, due to his indestructible Spark, he's technically the first character on there to survive a loss.
2219
« on: March 31, 2012, 07:08:35 AM »
Ah, it must be something to do with the tyres. Generally, if something heavy (Like an opponent's chassis) sits on top of them, it prevents them from turning properly.
2220
« on: March 30, 2012, 06:54:21 PM »
Funny thing is, that's more or less what happened...except with a sheep that fell from the sky, and the aforementioned Ass Pull of a power.
That was definitely my personal DMOS for the series. The Master Chief vs Doomguy fight I could tolerate, but this? Just no.
|
Show Posts