Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Venko

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 47
201
Tournament Archives / Re: Tusslers 2 SBV
« on: April 28, 2013, 04:52:57 PM »
Why the splash says that Mystic2000 entered, but I don't see him anywhere?

202
Contests / Re: Vote BOTM May 2013
« on: April 28, 2013, 06:28:17 AM »
I must admit, after seeing all these problems, that the rules were truly kinda "nazi".
#1 This bot just look so awesome.
#2 Are even the animated gif-s allowed to upload for the BotM? Aside from that, clever pic and it's a very cool art bot.
#3 Not bad at all, but illegal due to no respect shown for ClickB.
#4 Good, but another illegal entry, no 2 inside shots (no actual need for 2 insides, but still illegal).
#5 Another cool entry.
#6 Generally OK, but somehow ugly.
Not an easy choice again, but my vote goes slightly for "Cloud 9".

203
Modifications / Re: Official GTM AI Pack!
« on: April 27, 2013, 08:36:41 AM »
I'm pretty good with any graphical software, I can make an awesome GUI. I just need the concept from the community, so I can start my work. For example, I can make the smoke from the above pic a top layer (the layer with the buttons) alpha channel smoke, which will "smoke" the background, which could be filled with bots or whatever. I can make a translucent smoky buttons too. I can make/clone a GTM forum UI theme also.

204
Tournament Archives / Re: [need to think of name]
« on: April 27, 2013, 07:47:34 AM »
Stock middlewight 385.0-400.0
MW is up to 399.0, 399.1 is considered a HW.
Multibots are allowed but each half must be under 200.00 kg
It must be 199.5 according to ^
no cheatbot parts or custom made parts
We need your stance about the 140cm extenders, the new uberstack, the release of this as an AI and about the Cheap Norris type bots.
bots must show controlled movement [no 1 wheel, Crawlers,Bumble balls, Nasty Pickles, piston fliers]
Fix this part very carefully, or I will punish you with a legal cheap/loophole entry.
i can AI but i would like you to AI [or if someone can ai for me]
If you can't handle the AI-ing part, search for an AI-er first, or don't host a tournament at all.
arena is going to be Containment Cube
Hazards ON or OFF?
winner will be ranked 3rd in rankings
So the real 3rd goes 4th?
i will make roster bigger if more people want to join.
Prepare a bye bots, and show your entries.
Also, no prizes?

205
Modifications / Re: Official GTM AI Pack!
« on: April 27, 2013, 06:56:30 AM »
IMO, this is fair :

Ianh will just release this under ARBBC AI, with the teams as they are now, no changes, only a 1 bot of free choice is added. 'cos I want to play/mess around with the bots from the ARBBC. I submited some bots, that I shouldn't for this one, so I think, that I desreve to correspondingly have the other peoples bots that they submited, I'm highly NOT agree with any changes in the 5 originally submited bots!

Separated from this project, some members can start a work about a GTM official AI, in which EVERY member have ONLY 1 team of 6 bots. And it's TOTALLY up to him, absolutely free to enter whatever stock bots he wants, could be his famous ones, any Wclass, freaks, legals ,illigals ,140s ,no140s ,art bots ,UHWs , whatever the member thinks it represents him best! So for example, when you search for team Ianh, you will expect AWs, FWs, if you search for me, you will expect UHWs, art bots, some MidFs, and so on... The members must have a totally free choice to choose what they think that represent themselves best.

DSL official AI could be worked and released separately.

206
Stock Showcases / Re: Lightning S.'s Stock Showcase
« on: April 27, 2013, 05:06:27 AM »
<3 Bear hug 3 (the bear claws are a weapons for ramming/hammering, it's a concussion weapon, a fact, so they do have some use here...)
<3 Alien (even with the 140s...)

207
Tournament Archives / Re: CombatAnts 3 - Signups
« on: April 25, 2013, 12:48:21 PM »
*Waiting for Venko to join this so I can get some revenge*  :dumb)
Don't be so sure, "my subscriber"  ;)

208
Modifications / Re: Official GTM AI Pack!
« on: April 25, 2013, 11:35:19 AM »
I have decided that if I don't receive a 6th bot from those who entered ARBBC I will fill the 6th bot spot with one of my fleaweights to give my teams fleaweight something to fight against (not that it couldn't challenge some of the AW's).
A very good idea, send me a FW, (a one, that you think, that will "team up" best with my team, different missing bot type or whatever) so I can "goldenize" it.

209
Just make sure they all use the same theme and the evolutions seem Pokemon-esque. Don't just name them MiDF LW, MiDF MW, MiDF HW or anything like that.
Sadly, I'm too old to know, what that Pokemon sh** is. But don't worry, I will be more creative with the names. My offer for you to post a pic of CN was serious, since only I have such a bot for now, do you want me to make a screenshot of it for you? (some wanting to enter newbies may not know about this bot, so it's a good idea)

210
I don't want to thwart the fun, so there will be no "team MIDF" or "team THEY CAME FROM THE SECRET FOLDER" from me.  :laughing However, I still can't come up with a good idea, so my entering could be not soon.

211
Modifications / Re: Official GTM AI Pack!
« on: April 25, 2013, 05:32:07 AM »
By any chance, Ian, are you still accepting teams?
Am I predicting that the team will be the "red extender network"?  :mrgreen:

212
Discussion / Re: How do people feel about using each others chassis?
« on: April 25, 2013, 05:28:35 AM »
IMO :
[I will use the "no personal attack/s to anyone here" script from now on, just in case if someone decide something else...]
Making a good airtight chassis and some insane stacking in it takes time.
The time is the most precious resource in a human life.
If someone wants a good chassis, he must build it, no free lunch here.
I'm with Nar on that, because the newbies will not learn to build, if you give them a half-ready bot.
Plus, it's a known fact, that I don't like the copying, I even don't showcase any bots, that looks like a clone.
[/no personal attack/s to anyone here]

213
Stock Showcases / Re: Venko's showcase
« on: April 25, 2013, 05:13:05 AM »
Out of curiosity, Venko, can that bot clear pits?
I'm not sure, that I understand your question.
Wait, no, silly question- You AI your bots to test them.
Actually he never really AI's his bots.
Generally ^, usually I pretend "AI acting" pretty well, but once I did some very basic AI for my NF outwedging bot, so he outwedge (not 100% of the tries tho) NF AI vs AI in a direct wedge-wedge contact.

214
Tournament Archives / Re: Tusslers 2 SBV
« on: April 24, 2013, 03:34:33 PM »

215
Tournament Archives / Re: Evo-Bots: Bots That Evolve.
« on: April 24, 2013, 11:50:02 AM »
Venko. Chill. Seriously.

Everyone pretty much thinks your bot is cheap, you even called it cheap for heck's sake, and yet you go all Don Quixote when someone else bans this design for another tournament for being cheap. Way to be hypocritical man.

You have rights to defend it because 090901 allowed it, but going all mean mode and doing a personal attack because someone else thought it was cheap and didn't want some in his tournament ? Stupid move man.

You have been warned for randomly attacking other people for no reason in places you shouldn't really be... don't make it again !
:facepalm: :fail: for Nar, is all I can say... When you decide, that this is a personal attack, but not an discussion?

IF I HAVE SOMETHING AGAINST IANH PERSONALY, I WILL TELL IT TO HIM IN MSN! GO ASK HIM!

216
Tournament Archives / Re: Evo-Bots: Bots That Evolve.
« on: April 24, 2013, 11:45:12 AM »
What the heck man? Why do you think I'm upset with losing?
First, I work with an arguments. Then, why the problems came exactly after your loss, but not on the first look at it?
You clearly know that it was a cheap tatic because you named it Cheap Norris...
Because, I knew that ALL THIS could happen.
Insect, Cyborg II and Encroaching Darkness were allowed and would be allowed again because they have attempted to protect the drive and extenders when clearly Cheap Norris does not, this is the difference between legal and illegal (for my tournaments unless stated otherwise), cheap and legit.
Insect and CN have the same basis, I just changed the weapons (HSs for no countdown), and moved the protection from the extenders to the chassis. Trovaner saw my early attempt of this bot, I just didn't have an enough weight to protect the drive too, that's why I even used the 140s. The Insect and the CN "legs" are equally easy (at general) to break, and the both bots goes in a spike-ball mode. So, what if I protect those extenders?
Yes it was legal in Tusslers but here it isn't, this is to prevent people from using the same tactic this isn't me hating on you for winning against me.
It's not like it gonna win it, plus it's a "certain type" counter bot, and as you saw, it was countered and defeated as well. So no "unbeatable" advantage here, which a bumple ball WILL have. Self-damaging weapons, not-so-much-24-maces and other disadvantages as well.
What consequences? Man you need to chill out a bit. ?
Just don't take this personal, I can't even enter (neither plan) to enter such a thing here (also no 140s here), but starting a discussion about an unfair banning of a bot type (IMO) is unavoidable. Keep in mind, that it's up to me to decide how to enter LEGALLY (innovative, cheap, clever or whatever), and I'm not an "OK guy" just to sit and watch a banning of bots of mine, when it's unfair IMO. You are stopping the innovations this way, and my advice to you is, to start a list - which bot types are allowed and which one not, including my new bot types, and such that I'm about to discover in the future.
At least, post a pic for the newbies, 'cos I doubt they know what a CN is, when they read your rules...

217
Tournament Archives / Re: Evo-Bots: Bots That Evolve.
« on: April 24, 2013, 08:48:09 AM »
*No Venko-style Bumble balls (Cheap Norris style bots), it's basically a cheap robot which was against the rules anyway but this clears things up.
You are swimming in a dangerous waters...
1. You are just upset with your loss from it, next time build a better bot, instead of accusing me of an illegal entry.
2. It's a completely legal bot for the Tusslers 2 rules, and that's why it's not removed.
3. "Cheap" is a word which lays on your personal hate against this bot (as Naryar hate crawlers for example, and I hate popups, but we don't ban them in our tournaments...).
3. You are basically banning all VSs from your tournament, since there are no clear rules, what is VS and what "cheap" bot.
4. You allowed Insect in your tournament, so I don't see how the adding of some HSs to it, makes it illegal.
The rules and the decisions are up to you for this one, but you will have to accept the consequences later.

218
Stock Showcases / Re: Venko's showcase
« on: April 24, 2013, 08:26:06 AM »
HPZ > Extender > HPZ > Extender > HPZ > Disc > Iron.
^QFT


Probably the worst bot in this showcase, showcased only for inspiring purposes.

219
Stock Showcases / Re: GameKing3's Showcase
« on: April 24, 2013, 06:08:06 AM »
...and the cruel.
Dude, this concept sux hard even from the blueprints. No way to make something good out of it. Just abandon this sh** and start a totally new bot.

220
Tournament Archives / Re: Tusslers 2 SBV
« on: April 23, 2013, 04:49:27 PM »

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 47