This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dragon Ninja
21
« on: August 21, 2006, 02:50:55 PM »
Battlebots had "better" robots than robot wars did. Robot wars had more "creative" robots than battlebots did. Some Robot Wars bots competed in BattleBots, and they didn't as good as they did in Robot Wars. Hypnodisk was one of the robots that caused the most damage in RW, but that was only in the first few seasons when all the other robots had poor protection. In comparison to BB, the robots in robot wars were far less destructive.
What do you mean ""better" robots"? Robot Wars had the most powerful heavy weight flippers in the world. Take WBC and Gravity for example. And don't forget RW had some nifty rammers and spinners.
22
« on: August 21, 2006, 02:50:39 PM »
Battlebots had "better" robots than robot wars did. Robot wars had more "creative" robots than battlebots did. Some Robot Wars bots competed in BattleBots, and they didn't as good as they did in Robot Wars. Hypnodisk was one of the robots that caused the most damage in RW, but that was only in the first few seasons when all the other robots had poor protection. In comparison to BB, the robots in robot wars were far less destructive.
What do you mean ""better" robots"? Robot Wars had the most powerful heavy weight flippers in the world. Take WBC and Gravity for example. And don't forget RW had some nifty rammers and spinners.
23
« on: August 18, 2006, 09:48:17 AM »
Pfft, Metal Virus...what a typical jdickwad when it comes to RW.
24
« on: June 07, 2006, 03:10:59 AM »
Update!
Parts
Matila's flywheel
Stapler
Croc jaws
Big Brother mace
Mace 2 flipper
Robots
Hazard
BotABing
Chopper
Katnip(UK)
Knightmare
Iron Awe 2.5
Arenas
Motorway arena
Subway arena
Warzone arena
25
« on: February 24, 2006, 01:03:32 PM »
Well Click said he had college work to do so it might be abit later.
26
« on: February 17, 2006, 05:39:54 PM »
Friday, February 17, 2006, way too long.
27
« on: February 08, 2006, 02:08:17 PM »
Not really, considering it's only penis jokes and jerks like Goliath.
BTW, good job, Click and co.
28
« on: February 03, 2006, 01:17:34 PM »
Well this is intresting....
29
« on: January 13, 2006, 02:08:40 AM »
Nice work, guys. 
30
« on: December 20, 2005, 11:14:37 AM »
The game engine won't allow it.
31
« on: December 18, 2005, 06:53:09 PM »
Yet another update:
Other
Music in arenas.
32
« on: September 09, 2005, 04:55:24 PM »
No. This is Beta, made by the people who made Terrorhurtz for RW(who are British). Beta was made for BB, but broke down or something.
33
« on: September 09, 2005, 02:30:18 PM »
That's amazing. So will there be a few more British bots in DSL:TC 2.0?
34
« on: August 12, 2005, 02:07:51 PM »
That replica truely kicks ass.
35
« on: August 08, 2005, 01:35:20 PM »
No, they did a lot of stuff and were the main developers of DSL. So? Darkrat and Starcore didn't say they were going on a vacation. They just abandonned us. That's what it seems to me.
36
« on: August 08, 2005, 09:02:50 AM »
So 1 main member's dead, and the other 2 buggered off. Do you think it's time for a name change?
37
« on: August 06, 2005, 06:04:44 PM »
Oh.  I'm sad now. :cry:
38
« on: August 05, 2005, 07:13:45 PM »
Are Darkrat and Starcore even still around?
39
« on: August 02, 2005, 05:18:03 AM »
An improved Biohazard skin would be good.
40
« on: August 01, 2005, 07:14:48 AM »
Well I know FB isn't going to update the Battlebox anytime soon... those screw hazards are too complicated to make with grape crates (his arena building blocks). Plus he's already working on another, bigger arena project... something that's never been done before, going to be very cool and very fun... you'll just have to wait to see it. If the Battlebox is going to get updated it would be goose or ACAMS that did it and I don't know if they're planning to.
The Ocean Platform was made by FB btw. Not me. He does all the arenas and I do all the replicas and parts. Oops. Sorry. @FB-Great job, FB.
|
Show Posts