This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Resetti's Replicas
1981
« on: May 13, 2012, 08:32:55 PM »
Why do you guys hate Sara Palin so much? 
I love her - she ensured that the right person got elected to office.
1982
« on: May 13, 2012, 08:22:28 PM »
I've started it. The ink effects don't look nearly as good as they do on the Wii version, but it's all right. Also, I think I lost one of the pottery fetch quest items permanently due to a bug in the game.
1983
« on: May 13, 2012, 07:36:27 PM »
Cartoons don't age very well, I have to go with the newest one here.
1984
« on: May 13, 2012, 05:35:48 PM »
The Tartan Terror. Took a  of a lot of drawing for a robot that will never win a battle. Also will need some special AI code to compensate for swerving (I've included a shot of the wheel layout) 
1985
« on: May 12, 2012, 02:56:02 PM »
Hey guys here's a random idea lets not star-
oh who am I kidding you are all assholes who couldn't control yourselves for sh**.
wha?
1986
« on: May 12, 2012, 10:59:44 AM »
I'll bet you a tenner he was wearing a cup.
1987
« on: May 11, 2012, 09:28:33 PM »
Have you filed an adoption request yet?
1988
« on: May 11, 2012, 07:41:50 PM »
hahaha, goldenfox a villain ? yeah, not gonna happen.
Meh, declare it more hammily =P
Snark doesn't mix well with ham. Go and check back your literary basics !
Are you sure ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snark_(Lewis_Carroll)
Way to completely miss the point. Maybe I should ban you after all.
Fair enough, I thought you had meant the other meaning of "snark" so I was making the logical jokey pun. I won't begrudge you if decide to ban me.
1989
« on: May 11, 2012, 07:15:58 PM »
hahaha, goldenfox a villain ? yeah, not gonna happen.
Meh, declare it more hammily =P
Snark doesn't mix well with ham. Go and check back your literary basics !
Are you sure ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snark_(Lewis_Carroll)
1990
« on: May 10, 2012, 10:42:47 PM »
Cool, thanks, I'll be sure to try that. In the meantime, here's Chip. I lost the S7 version when my computer died so I decided to make this version just to avoid repetition. It appears to have only one beater. 
1991
« on: May 10, 2012, 07:22:15 PM »
How do you know that?
His username on Wikipedia is Joerger and his signature is "Run Amok." The only other page he edits is the Robot Wars page on Wikipedia. I think it's a fair assumption. @freez, this is what you want, http://members.toast.net/joerger/AskAaron.html
1992
« on: May 10, 2012, 07:09:15 PM »
Here's the best part. His hobby is maintaining the Wikipedia page "List of Celebrities on the Hollywood Walk of Fame." Not researching mind you, just reverting edits when someone adds a false star, or adds a star that has been announced but not yet installed. But oh no, we're the ones with the frivolous obsession.
1993
« on: May 10, 2012, 06:44:23 PM »
It's not just RWW, it's Battlebots and Robotica wiki's too. Something about having detailed information on lesser known competitors rubs them the wrong way. Like I said, if he wants people to stop asking him questions on one-off competitiors, he should stop reacting to people who do.
1994
« on: May 10, 2012, 05:31:50 PM »
I'd hazard that the Joerger gene pool is just brimming with Aspergers
What's wrong with having Aspergers?
Honestly, that was just the backlash of me having a bad day. Nothing is wrong with having Aspergers, I was just basing my "observation" on what "Parent Hood" and "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo" portray Aspergers as. But I'm not a doctor, so I've got no right to make such observations. If you need to dime me out to Ask Aaron then so be it. I was wrong to say it and I'm sorry if I offended anyone.
1995
« on: May 10, 2012, 07:22:04 AM »
how do I do that?
1996
« on: May 10, 2012, 12:09:58 AM »
That may be, but his initial reaction was so hostile that I assumed he just wanted to blow off steam. Long story short we did eff up, but we eventually made it right, and he still calls the practice of wiki-making a "fanboy" thing; I really have no idea where we stand. We stopped asking trivia questions when he said he wasn't fielding them anymore, you can see that all of the recent ones are questions that could be answered by a page on the wiki. More to the point, my problems weren't about anything he said to me directly, but about the way he gives snarky responses, and then gets gobsmacked when he receives them (which he could just choose to delete from the inbox). ANYways, that's enough digressing, I apologize for the tangent. To make it up, here's something I found when I searched "cameron robot" http://www.discoverychannel.ca/Article.aspx?aid=34910 It looks like there won't be a combat element after all but the robotics stuff is pretty cool.
1997
« on: May 09, 2012, 08:29:28 PM »
Yep
1998
« on: May 09, 2012, 06:28:52 PM »
Black and Blue. It's the same robot with 2 different skins. I know it's kind of big, but I used the superflat chassis glitch and proportioned from there. It's just under the heavyweight threshhold so technically an eligible clusterbot We have no high quality pics of the original. 
1999
« on: May 09, 2012, 05:27:56 PM »
That site is not a 100% credible source. It's very opinionated and biased and has been wrong in the past. Discovery said the event is going to happen, and yes someone from battlebots is directly involved in this.
I'm starting to think he wants it to fail.
2000
« on: May 08, 2012, 08:26:30 PM »
Nate has done plenty of reviews, he knows what he's doing.
Whenever I hear someone say "I'm gonna review X", I think of them as saying the following:
HEY GUYZ I AM NEXT NOsTALGIA CRITIC HURR HUE HURR HRURR
Really? You think that anytime anyone announces they're going to review anything?
|
Show Posts