This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - helloface
1961
« on: February 28, 2014, 02:57:55 PM »
- Bots must pass stability tests. I will never decline a robot due to this without notifying you of the problem to ensure it will be fair; however if anyone complains that a bot shouldn't have gotten past it, they are at risk for a disqualification.
What do you mean by this? Are the people that complain at risk, or are the robots that are complained about at risk? I'd like some clarification before I go build.
Also, what exactly constitutes a stability test?
I like to play around with bots after AIing with them. If they bounce around out of control after a couple hits too much or havok a lot, I will further test that robot and it will be declined until the bot is fixed or replaced. As for the disqualification, the people who complain about the robots are at risk. EDIT: On that note, all bots are AI'd.
1962
« on: February 28, 2014, 02:38:41 PM »
RedAce & SKBT accepted.
1963
« on: February 28, 2014, 02:16:30 PM »
Do I still really have to put a Union Flag on it? It's a stupid rule and I liked the paint scheme before I added the Saltire.
Nah, I agree. The more I think about it, it really is an incredibly dumb rule. Kurt accepted and RedAce received, and mine & S.H.I.E.L.D's AI and splashes done.
Note: It's not invertible.
I know, AI works fine aside from sluggishness.
1964
« on: February 28, 2014, 12:45:12 PM »
Kurt accepted and RedAce received, and mine & S.H.I.E.L.D's AI and splashes done.
1965
« on: February 28, 2014, 12:41:49 PM »
If OOTAs were possible it would probably Rage 3.
1966
« on: February 27, 2014, 10:40:53 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
I have seen that enough times that it literally fills me with rage when I see it now.
what are you helloface now?
lol @ people thinking I hate goats
lol @ denial
The more I got spammed, the more I found it funny
1967
« on: February 27, 2014, 10:33:43 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
I have seen that enough times that it literally fills me with rage when I see it now.
what are you helloface now?
lol @ people thinking I hate goats
1968
« on: February 27, 2014, 09:45:28 PM »
Axes look a little odd, otherwise nice.
1969
« on: February 27, 2014, 06:06:33 PM »
S.H.I.E.L.D accepted, and so will Kurt once he put the Union Jack on his bot.
1970
« on: February 27, 2014, 06:00:31 PM »
1971
« on: February 27, 2014, 05:39:55 PM »
Video uploading now.
1972
« on: February 27, 2014, 05:03:00 PM »
RA3 is the closest comparison to Scrapmatch.
Now quit your b*tching.
1973
« on: February 27, 2014, 01:26:49 PM »
Dude.... This looks SO potential for a Robot Arena 3 game... I wish you best of luck with this!
And I think you're over exaggerating way too much.
I'm not going to deny that this is quite good design, beyond my capabilities if I tried, but is this going to be a random downloadable game, a game that'll be on Steam Greenlight/Xbox Live Arcade or what? Because it's a nice project and all, but people calling it RA3 are going way overboard with this.
Still, best of luck I guess.
What does it require of a game to be worthy of the 'RA3' title, And how is the distribution method relevant?
It doesn't matter.
1974
« on: February 26, 2014, 08:10:36 PM »
That's my mom. That's not her name though either. My brother made my parents a joint Facebook account, but my father won't touch a computer.
Funnier is that I thought 'Donnie Johnson' was a relative based on the name and picture.
You're as white-trash-trailer-park as ACAMS.. lol
ACAMS isn't trailer park. He's ****ing loaded.
Can't he be both?
1975
« on: February 25, 2014, 05:03:58 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
Looks great. You should add a "toggle chassis" feature where you can toggle whether you can see the chassis or not.
1976
« on: February 24, 2014, 07:11:16 PM »
i know, i was making a joke
durr i dum
1977
« on: February 24, 2014, 06:52:33 PM »
Thrash/Metal/Rock, pick whichever fits best.
Depending on which one you pick above, N/Y/Y.
1978
« on: February 24, 2014, 06:25:52 PM »
It's supped to be pronounced like that.
1979
« on: February 24, 2014, 05:34:35 PM »
Anything else looks horrible on it. I wanted it to look and perform like Nightmare. Good enough to put on a show, not quite good enough to win.
Nightmare had 8 wins and the most destructive VS in the division...
Yes. But it never won a whole Battlebots tourney 
No, but it did win Most Aggressive one year.
And that's what I aim to do with this bot.
Don't think it's going to be very aggressive with that drive :P As long as it looks nice, I don't really care though.
1980
« on: February 24, 2014, 05:27:18 PM »
Anything else looks horrible on it. I wanted it to look and perform like Nightmare. Good enough to put on a show, not quite good enough to win.
Nightmare had 8 wins and the most destructive VS in the division...
Yes. But it never won a whole Battlebots tourney
No, but it did win Most Aggressive one year.
|
Show Posts