This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sage
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 334
1601
« on: June 10, 2011, 11:58:22 PM »
Just got myself a GF for the first time a few weeks ago. yay
but seriously if you're still in high school (as I am) date someone from a different school... so much less drama it's ridiculous.
1602
« on: June 10, 2011, 05:28:41 PM »
Sage, did you ever post the insides of the bot in your sig (top right)?
I'm curious about the setup
/Offtopic
(Image removed from quote.)
built off one axle mount.
Not really... it's probably the most insane set up ever. I'll see if I can find the bot and just remove everything to show you guys.
1603
« on: June 10, 2011, 05:05:19 PM »
@Fracture- I'm talking voltage, not how much power it drains each time. A DDT requires 500 whatevers to reach max velocity and power, and two of them require 1000.
1604
« on: June 10, 2011, 03:47:54 PM »
You could get a second black in there by removing 1 razor and extender from each DDT (4 is a tad much anyway) and making the wheels shiny.
Vertigos right, for 2 DDTs you need more than 1 black (1000 intake, 800 output = not full power.)
1605
« on: June 10, 2011, 03:04:28 PM »
Trying to rebuild Gridlock
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)
Same as the last on but with grannies and different weapon positions. Still invertible and DSA.
Looks pretty sweet. Would you be able to get away with 20cm extenders to attach 2 irons to each HPZ so you could get away with 4 HPZs for weaponry?
NFX, that actually defeats the purpose of this robot. 20 cms have 200hp, while Irons have 1000. Thus, irons are much harder to knock off than irons attached to extenders. It's a very valid concept and one I'm going to explore more.
1606
« on: June 10, 2011, 03:01:59 PM »
We all know I did well in BBEANS because my bot had the best skin.
BOT: I hope I can win at least one... otherwise I'm blaming whoever told me to build a LW cubezorz.
1607
« on: June 10, 2011, 01:11:44 PM »
Sexy. Told you you could do it! Any problems with havok?
1608
« on: June 10, 2011, 01:10:22 PM »
Check out what Pwnator is talking about, it's pretty sweet. Scroll down that page he linked to till you get to RA2 Cheat Mode Pack, see if that's what you're talking about.
1609
« on: June 10, 2011, 10:44:25 AM »
Cool dude. Wish it was wider but not much you can do I guess.
1610
« on: June 09, 2011, 06:19:28 PM »
Lets hold a tournament where you use Teamviewer to actually drive the bot. Of course, only trusted members allowed.
Sparkey has a cool idea??????
1611
« on: June 09, 2011, 12:04:54 PM »
i would, unfortunately im out of town in a few days for two weeks.
1612
« on: June 09, 2011, 11:57:15 AM »
OH that must be why whenever a plow gets hit from behind, it almost always falls off.
1613
« on: June 09, 2011, 12:17:05 AM »
Okay, that makes sense.
Next HW stock tournament I'm entering a melty brain HS.
EDIT: @joe- video please!
1614
« on: June 08, 2011, 11:59:04 PM »
So plows have 100HP? why don't they fall off more often?
1615
« on: June 08, 2011, 11:54:08 PM »
By that argument you can make AI codes where lightning attacks all opponents and kills them instantly. It IS AI, you are right. Could a human controlled bot do it? Not without custom components. But hey, it's not a human tournament, it's an AI tournament! SO obviously anything that gives bots advantages is fair game.
But you see we don't outlaw the use of lightening because a human driver can't create it. We outlaw it because it defeats the purpose of RA2. In RA2 robots are supposed to fight. That is a principle of the game. That is why dealing damage to your opponent via an AI is disallowed.
We use AI's to drive our bots and allow for robot fighting to take place. Human control is another method of getting robots to fight each other. Both are valid ways, but AI doesn't have to be restrained to only allowing what human drivers can do.
Alright. I'll go build a bot that has no wheels which flies around the arena (thanks to AI) that drops down on the top of other robots (this no wheeled robot has a rack of FS on the bottom) for an easy KO. The robots are fighting each other, right? I'm just using AI for advantageous movement.
1616
« on: June 08, 2011, 11:42:01 PM »
Because they WOULD be human controlled if RA2 wasn't so damn laggy.
Irrelevant. They ARE AI tournaments. If we ever get human control tournaments then the rules can be set as fit. But right now our tournaments use AI.
By that argument you can make AI codes where lightning attacks all opponents and kills them instantly. It IS AI, you are right. Could a human controlled bot do it? Not without custom components. But hey, it's not a human tournament, it's an AI tournament! SO obviously anything that gives bots advantages is fair game.
1617
« on: June 08, 2011, 11:28:33 PM »
controlled movement test,
You mean a manual controlled movement test. They can function just fine, and seeing how these are AI tournaments and all I don't see why human control should even get involved.
Because they WOULD be human controlled if RA2 wasn't so damn laggy.
1618
« on: June 08, 2011, 10:06:31 PM »
Hmmm true. But killing off designs won't help.
I'm all for the design! Just not Melty brain
1619
« on: June 08, 2011, 10:02:51 PM »
Once again, this hateful community lessens the fun in a dying game :/
People have been saying ra2 is dying for years.
1620
« on: June 08, 2011, 10:01:09 PM »
If you can't drive it as good as the AI does yourself, it shouldn't be allowed.
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 334
|
Show Posts