161
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 163
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Guldenflame's DSL showcase« on: April 09, 2017, 01:12:11 AM »
Digging the weapon and the supports, lookin slick
Wheels being half way in the chassis is off, but since theyre being covered i guess its aight 164
Tournament Archives / Re: Complete Carnage [STOCK HW/SHW]« on: April 08, 2017, 02:51:11 AM »
Originally had this idea for a tourney lmao
Id be down to join 165
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Shield's dumpster« on: April 06, 2017, 07:33:28 AM »
more for Doot's tourney
LW: ![]() ![]() ![]() SHW: ![]() ![]() ![]() 166
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Neon's Showcase« on: April 05, 2017, 10:53:15 PM »(Image removed from quote.) i cant help but feel like Astronomy would look better if the disc was just lower a notch or two so the middle of the disc is in the chassis instead of the open, that way you wont really need to build supports and you'll end up with a sleeker looking bot i mean you're probably gonna win BW class cause mech HS but it looks pretty bland imo, some wheel guards (something like Surgeon General's) could liven things up no comment on AW. i would suggest getting either cutting teeth or the tapering dsl bar so it looks like this: ![]() but idk if you have the weight to do that 167
DSL TC Showcases / Re: TheRoboteer Tries and Fails at DSL« on: April 05, 2017, 10:39:42 PM »idk about the alu piece just sticking out tbhget 168
DSL TC Showcases / Re: TheRoboteer Tries and Fails at DSL« on: April 05, 2017, 09:54:57 PM »idk about the alu piece just sticking out tbhget 169
DSL TC Showcases / Re: TheRoboteer Tries and Fails at DSL« on: April 05, 2017, 09:33:14 PM »
idk about the alu piece just sticking out tbh
either chisels or the wedge edge accompanying the metal panels would look better but it's a solid bot 170
Tournament Archives / Re: Iron Fighters (Name TBD) - Discussion« on: April 05, 2017, 09:21:36 PM »id enter. though imo it'd be better if the matches were made to be 3 minutes long instead of 2 its like watching a cripple fight its always entertaining 171
Tournament Archives / Re: Iron Fighters (Name TBD) - Discussion« on: April 05, 2017, 08:49:55 PM »
id enter. though imo it'd be better if the matches were made to be 3 minutes long instead of 2
172
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Dark-Al's DSL showcase (Definitely Something Lengthy)« on: April 05, 2017, 12:03:38 PM »
Headed inthe right direction but you could consider reinforcing the supports (I.E making them form a triangle for better shock absorption etc.) But its already lookin p cool actually
173
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Dark-Al's DSL showcase (Definitely Something Lengthy)« on: April 05, 2017, 02:11:46 AM »Yet again another bulk Post since A. No one is having anything to say (Due to posting at the wrong time) and B. Because I have built something better despite being the third Bulk post I've done. it looks kinda messy and the discs look sorta flimsy tbh what you could do is have only the outer disc (the one directly attached to the motor), and attach shell spinner panels onto it instead. to give off a sort of Redrum look and yea what mystic said, supports on either side instead of straight down the middle would be more stable and better looking Okay, another early morning update. Following Shield's advice, I made more improvements onto my Beetle-Weight. I've resized the chassis, change the drive motors and put iron spikes onto my machine. The reason for the astroflights is to prevent havoking which I encountered during numinous test drives. I tried putting on iron spikes on the old verison, but it kept pushing the Robot overweight. So here's the new design: you might want to try and tack on a wedge as the bot might be defected easily, rendering the face spinner useless Another Bulk post. This is a little flame thrower bot that I cobbled together in around five minute or so for fun, this is purely experimental so feel free to have a say on this and do say for any improvements. bland but alright. i'd try and free up some weight for teeth on the top to stop bots riding over since the bot isnt invertible as is anyway 174
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Official GTM Safe Space Thread« on: April 04, 2017, 07:18:58 AM »Lolololol the bacon ****er actually left because of this holy smokes he got triggered 175
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Shield's dumpster« on: April 03, 2017, 08:16:29 AM »
DP:
![]() ![]() ![]() messing around in botlab while thinking of an SHW for doots tourney. not eligible cause cb2 and the flipper is rly off Its called Cerberus and has 3 bursts EDIT: ![]() ![]() ![]() MW for doot's tourney 176
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Neon's Showcase« on: April 02, 2017, 11:49:26 PM »
what bajur said
there should be a better front wedge configuration available. maybe the metal panels or some of the replica parts? 177
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Orc's DSL Showcase« on: April 02, 2017, 10:47:51 PM »Just so people know I've been listening, I've made modifications to the robots that needed them: I'll probably be rebuilding some of these but these are the versions I have entered into DemonOfTomorrow's tournament as of today! these aren't bad. a little bland, but not bad. the bottom left bot would look better without the random spike strip at the back imo. would give you a little bit of weight to maybe connect the wheel guards to the chassis. can we get a full picture of it? the bot on the bottom right would look better if the "head" of the Chassis tapered instead of being a flat wall the mw and lw are neat. but the wheels clipping the chassis are a bit odd imo. i would rotate the wheel motors so the wheels line up parallel with the chassis wall but thats just me. EDIT: saw the full pics 179
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Shield's dumpster« on: April 02, 2017, 08:16:22 PM »I dig both Aye aye, will see what i can do 180
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Shield's dumpster« on: April 02, 2017, 09:02:55 AM »![]() ![]() cw for dooooooots tourney idk how i feel about the multi colored extenders looks rly tacky tbh EDIT: updated cw. decided to scrap the hs ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |