Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Enigm@

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 312
1341
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:48:53 PM »
I'm all good with having a rep system being based on posting quality.
Yeah, that sounds good to me. Hopefully should cut down on the complete jerks having overinflated Reps and those who do post good stuff having very little.

Examples (other than me, of course) ?

Hey Naryar, you never made a point about people who applaud or smite users with just blank reasons. I think this should be included as one of the things not to do, if this set of laws is passed, because unless it's incredibly clear why said user is getting rep'd up or down, I think ALL users who have the ability to control the reputation system should give at least some sort of reasoning. Because if it is very vague why they're giving karma, it could be for something stupid and not worthy of repping up.

I certainly did. From the first post :

-Always give a reason for your rep actions, and a clear one. Failure to do so tends to end in confusion,
like this "Beavis" and "Butthead" rep actions back then. Besides, we can't judge if the rep action is right or wrong.
Oh well I skimmed thru the OP. You didn't state any examples so that's why I didn't see it.

1342
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:43:46 PM »
Hey Naryar, you never made a point about people who applaud or smite users with just blank reasons. I think this should be included as one of the things not to do, if this set of laws is passed, because unless it's incredibly clear why said user is getting rep'd up or down, I think ALL users who have the ability to control the reputation system should give at least some sort of reasoning. Because if it is very vague why they're giving karma, it could be for something stupid and not worthy of repping up.

1343
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:39:38 PM »
SoTG is still fat though.
No.
You have to stop letting this get to you.

Actually come to think of it, keep getting mad because it's pretty solid entertainment brah.

Actually he showed no signs of anger. He was simply disagreeing with Noodle. So by that, He doesn't think SoTG is fat, but it does not bother him if we call her fat
his jimmies seemed mildly rustled in my opinion. The cold and straightforward "No." I think is pretty indicative of that.

1344
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:38:21 PM »
Again, this goes with the point I made earlier about how reputation shouldn't be seen as RA2-related because it doesn't affect gameplay or how good or terrible a user is at building. It really is just a community thing, because because it's not robotic drones that give people rep or rep them down, it's said people in said community. Therefore, I don't believe it's an RA2 thing.

or again, we could just save all this goddamn trouble and remove the reputation system.

1345
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:34:51 PM »
SoTG is still fat though.
No.
You have to stop letting this get to you.

Actually come to think of it, keep getting mad because it's pretty solid entertainment brah.

1346
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:28:06 PM »
EDIT:  Oh oh, I know!  Let's make it a beauraucracy where everyone who currently has repping powers keeps them, but instead of directly changing rep, we instead PM a request to smite/applaud to ACAMS.  You should totally show him that idea, he'll love it.
Idea of the year lel 10/10

I think it should be heavily based on RA2, as this is what the forum is about. I DO NOT think however, that it should be so heavily based on RA2 that one would just go "<insert name here> hasn't been building bots to my liking, i'll rep him down". I also think that rep downs should not only occur when law breaking, but aswell as the mood of the person. If someone has paticular negative and mean towards the commuinty, but not breaking laws, that person should still be repped down.
The only problem with that is that it hasn't been a problem of people just repping down users because they haven't been building. If that was the case, I'd be in hot water right now with like -10 rep or something..

1347
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:21:33 PM »
I have no idea what is going on.

SoTG is still fat though.
lel'd.

LEL WOAH TOTALLY FAT BRO

1348
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:18:59 PM »
I think that it IS justified if someone reps someone down with reasoning such as "that's a retarded post and you should stop posting" because even if they are being blunt, they're trying to get a point across, and with some members, repping them down is the only way to get a point across. I judge people on their character, not some silly number on a forum for an obscure game that's almost ten years old.

That's a fair point. I do believe before making a system of laws, we should define "reputation". Is it something RA2-related or not ?
I believe it's more of a community related thing. I mean does how good or how bad your rep is affect how good of a builder you are ? No. Ergo, I don't think it should be RA2-related in that sense.

1349
Chatterbox / Re: Birthday Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:13:43 PM »
what team 9 is 17, i thought he was 13 or something
So did I.

1350
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 03:12:41 PM »
how about acams just removes reputation entirely so this isn't a damn problem.

Seriously, some members on here take reputation FAR more seriously than they should. I think that it IS justified if someone reps someone down with reasoning such as "that's a retarded post and you should stop posting" because even if they are being blunt, they're trying to get a point across, and with some members, repping them down is the only way to get a point across. I judge people on their character, not some silly number on a forum for an obscure game that's almost ten years old.

1351
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Enigma's Showcase
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:54:38 PM »
I've been throwing around ideas for ultra-heavies, so expect something within a couple hours.

1352
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:48:45 PM »
but it's hard when you see people repping up or down for the most trivial reasons.
AKA "potato is not a valid downrep reason"
"I don't like you therefore I'm repping you down"

1353
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:38:36 PM »
We should stop Enigma posting any posts with the word 'Noodle' in it. =P
Nah bro, Enigma can say what he likes, he's an OK dude and has schweet music taste.
awww :heart_smiley:

1354
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:36:21 PM »
We should stop Enigma posting any posts with the word 'Noodle' in it. =P
we sohuld

1355
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:25:56 PM »
I'm literally lelling out loud right now because of how noodle's been able to stir up the sh** pot with only a few posts.
God I wish I could rep him up, where the **** is Serge ? he'd do it.

1356
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 02:22:59 PM »
because he makes people lel

like me
And? Anything actually worthwhile, instead of just attacking people (not trolling- there's generally some humour involved with that) in the hopes of raising a cheap laugh from the lowest on the GTM Totem?
uh yeah, there was humor in it because I laughed.

1357
Chatterbox / Re: Ok, Here's the situation.
« on: July 03, 2012, 12:29:58 PM »
get him to say "I know pronounce Kill343gs and Enigma husband and wife"

1359
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: General Chatter Thread
« on: July 03, 2012, 09:57:35 AM »
I just repped him down because he's an unproductive jerk. =P But obsequious is a funny word.
Now let's see if he can take it as well as he can dish it out    :rolleyes:

To be honest, he probably gives less ****s about rep than he does about the truth of his own words.
He really doesn't give half a sh**. On youtube whenever someone calls out he doesn't curr.
Also goldenfox you take this sh** way too ****ing seriously. Scourge basically said Idoncurr when Noodle was trolling her, and you get buttfrustrated for no reason.

like, what the **** man

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 312