Quote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on March 31, 2012, 01:34:35 PMQuote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:20:35 PM65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?insulting acams probably wont helpWhat's he going to do about it? It's not like the racist, homophobic sack of crap does much moderating that's actually useful.
Quote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:20:35 PM65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?insulting acams probably wont help
65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?
Quote from: NFX on March 31, 2012, 01:48:32 PMThat's what really pisses me off about this sort of thing, people getting a far more lenient sentence than others for the same offense, for reasons which aren't relevent to the problem at all. Rules are RULES, not flexible guidelines, and apply to EVERYONE. No-one bar no-one should be above them.I go by how many time they have been warned, if they have a long list, they get a longer warning.I think that is fair .... don't you?
That's what really pisses me off about this sort of thing, people getting a far more lenient sentence than others for the same offense, for reasons which aren't relevent to the problem at all. Rules are RULES, not flexible guidelines, and apply to EVERYONE. No-one bar no-one should be above them.
Hmm...true enough, considering what I think the system is at the moment (X% warn where X is dependent on the word said), it probably shouldn't be more than something like...25%-35% tops, I would think.
GF93 has just apologised via the chat on the portal. Just to let everyone know.
Quote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:43:55 PMQuote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on March 31, 2012, 01:34:35 PMQuote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:20:35 PM65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?insulting acams probably wont helpWhat's he going to do about it? It's not like the racist, homophobic sack of crap does much moderating that's actually useful.are my sarcasm detectors failingacams does a ton for this site... without him there wouldnt BE a gtm
Quote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on March 31, 2012, 05:23:21 PMQuote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:43:55 PMQuote from: Mr. AwesumSauce on March 31, 2012, 01:34:35 PMQuote from: GoldenFox93 on March 31, 2012, 01:20:35 PM65% Warn for swearing? You've got to be kidding. Screw you ACAMS, you backwards Southern hick. What are your priorities again?insulting acams probably wont helpWhat's he going to do about it? It's not like the racist, homophobic sack of crap does much moderating that's actually useful.are my sarcasm detectors failingacams does a ton for this site... without him there wouldnt BE a gtmIgnore goldenfox when he's angry, he tends to say stupid things then.It's not like he's the only one.
obligatory battlebots 5 comment
I think we have all learned form this experiencenot to blame the AI.... they may have not feelings but there doing their bestmaybe not lash back at someone so hardand HurricaneAndrew played robot arena 2 in 2001 anyway all that aside, the 3 matches will be coming soon, one will go up tonight, S32 vs Yayoi I believe and the other 2 not far behind it
lash back
backlash
Yeah, I know! Some people say such stupid crap when they're angry!...
Thankfully you're improved a reasonable amount.What I tend to do when I get overly annoyed about something is go to a different website. The internet equivelant of talking a walk around the block. Once I return, I'm normally callm enough to write a coherent explanation of my views, rather than a oddly pieced-together rant.
For once the mods did something right
is this bot don't lost all razors in a fight before do a damage thought
I am meek and peaceful, and really do not want conflict to happen. I also DO NOT want to die in battle and go to Valhalla.