(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/88522chart.png)considering this test has a left-libertarian bias, you're pretty much a fascist m8
IDK what any of this chart means.
what happens when you don't understand a fourth of the questions?
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/42462chart.png)(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/53743result.png)
guess they didn't ask enough raycisss questions
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/5834Screenshot - 2_6_2017 , 8_20_27 PM.png)C O M M I E D E T E C T E D
I maded an artSo you were a dot on the top right?
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/59704art.png)
>AncapProtecting freedoms is way easier when the biggest enemy to freedom, the government, no longer exists. Contracts can be enforced by private mediation agencies chosen by the participants in the contract.
Hey, how do we protect freedoms, conduct diplomacy and enforce contracts without a government?
better test
http://spekr.org/
Also, ancap master race
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/67214beautiful-scene-in-christmas.jpg)
Seeing how you're doing is only an issue if you start lying to get certain results. I like it cuz the questions are better.
But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)really don't care if someone kills them self tbhActually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
I'm just making a point about euthanasia is not just a medical term ok? I just want to end this argument.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)really don't care if someone kills them self tbhActually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
lol don't get defensive it's just an argument on the internet my manI'm just making a point about euthanasia is not just a medical term ok? I just want to end this argument.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)really don't care if someone kills them self tbhActually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
It's just I wanted to put forward my view. But anyway, I'm going to move this to one side now. Happy?lol don't get defensive it's just an argument on the internet my manI'm just making a point about euthanasia is not just a medical term ok? I just want to end this argument.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)really don't care if someone kills them self tbhActually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
right on brotherIt's just I wanted to put forward my view. But anyway, I'm going to move this to one side now. Happy?lol don't get defensive it's just an argument on the internet my manI'm just making a point about euthanasia is not just a medical term ok? I just want to end this argument.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)really don't care if someone kills them self tbhActually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/48191heck.png)Literally the only other person who isn't a filthy commie.
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/fe/6d/7c/fe6d7c8dbc217f4e4010a7ec62d64e83.jpg)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
Saying that suicidal people are being selfish for removing themselves from the workforce is pretty heartless.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
It's not though. Euthanasia is LEGAL suicide whereas suicide is illegal (or that's how it should be). To me, euthanasia makes sense because the person isn't able to live anymore. Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
I'm sorry, I won't admit that they are the same. They are the same in concept but done for different reasons.
Saying that suicidal people are being selfish for removing themselves from the workforce is pretty heartless.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
It's not though. Euthanasia is LEGAL suicide whereas suicide is illegal (or that's how it should be). To me, euthanasia makes sense because the person isn't able to live anymore. Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
I'm sorry, I won't admit that they are the same. They are the same in concept but done for different reasons.
It certainly is. Nobody is choosing to be suicidal, by your logic should we also force the elderly and children to work, lest they take more from society than they give?Saying that suicidal people are being selfish for removing themselves from the workforce is pretty heartless.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
It's not though. Euthanasia is LEGAL suicide whereas suicide is illegal (or that's how it should be). To me, euthanasia makes sense because the person isn't able to live anymore. Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
I'm sorry, I won't admit that they are the same. They are the same in concept but done for different reasons.
It's not heartless at all. It's selfish not to help the economy that others are working for. Why should the majority suffer because of a few?
Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.out of all the retarded sh** i've seen on gtm, this is probably the most retarded
It certainly is. Nobody is choosing to be suicidal, by your logic should we also force the elderly and children to work, lest they take more from society than they give?Saying that suicidal people are being selfish for removing themselves from the workforce is pretty heartless.(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/26735Politcal compass.jpg)Actually no. Euthanasia can be committed under both medical and normal terms of suicide where ever you are in the world, for example if you wanted to die or needed help in committing suicide; your friend can just grab a gun and shoot you at anytime, or a medical reason like your friend pressing the off switch on a life-support machine at anytime to turn off life support, so you can slowly die. However either way, that would be classed as murder and that person who assisted you in euthanasia will be charged with the same charges as a murderer. The only time euthanasia is legal is when the government medically allows a person to die or turn off life-support in certain cases like if you're terminally ill or fully paralysed, then the government will allow it in certain cases.But the one is just medically assited suicide so they are both suicide :really_makes_you_think:
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.
Face it, euthanasia is still the same as suicide no matter what. Even when you think it's more to do with medical terms, euthanasia can still happen outside of government relation and hospitals themselves.
It's not though. Euthanasia is LEGAL suicide whereas suicide is illegal (or that's how it should be). To me, euthanasia makes sense because the person isn't able to live anymore. Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
I'm sorry, I won't admit that they are the same. They are the same in concept but done for different reasons.
It's not heartless at all. It's selfish not to help the economy that others are working for. Why should the majority suffer because of a few?
Anyway, you might be able to make the case for it being a good utilitarian idea, but I don't see how you can claim that it's not a heartless proposal.
I thought you UKIP nerds kept wanting to make more jobs, so if someone kills themselves then good news, job available, stop being a dick. But for real though, if someone has gotten to the point of suicide then it's a major thing, not just a little upset about things, and they need help, or are the concepts of emotions and compassion too difficult for you? If I was told how selfish and lazy I was for wanting to kill myself back when I genuinely did, that's helping nobody, and would've probably pushed me over the edge.
Ergo: Shut up.
Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
out of all the retarded sh** i've seen on gtm, this is probably the most retarded
To throw it out there, I hate the welfare state in Britain and am so against most welfare in the country. If a person who is 16 can work then they should. That goes up to the age of 65.Would that include people in further education (i.e. 6th form or Uni)? Even people persuing degrees that would not make them more marketable in regards to the workplace? Should people not have freedom to do what they want with their lives, even if that includes not working (for whatever reason)? Going further, should dedicated stay-at-home housewives (without children) be forced into work?
To throw it out there, I hate the welfare state in Britain and am so against most welfare in the country. If a person who is 16 can work then they should. That goes up to the age of 65.Would that include people in further education (i.e. 6th form or Uni)? Even people persuing degrees that would not make them more marketable in regards to the workplace? Should people not have freedom to do what they want with their lives, even if that includes not working (for whatever reason)? Going further, should dedicated stay-at-home housewives (without children) be forced into work?
Would you say that it's just morally wrong to intentionally stay out of work, for whatever reason, or would you legally force people to work in that situation, even if they aren't claiming benefits?To throw it out there, I hate the welfare state in Britain and am so against most welfare in the country. If a person who is 16 can work then they should. That goes up to the age of 65.Would that include people in further education (i.e. 6th form or Uni)? Even people persuing degrees that would not make them more marketable in regards to the workplace? Should people not have freedom to do what they want with their lives, even if that includes not working (for whatever reason)? Going further, should dedicated stay-at-home housewives (without children) be forced into work?
(Thank you for shortening xD)
Yes, even if you only working for a few hours a week. It's better than nothing. No, I don't believe so. If you are able to work then you should be because society revolves around everyone working together.
You have me there, though. It depends really on what they actually do at home and of course, that's too hard to monitor.
Would you say that it's just morally wrong to intentionally stay out of work, for whatever reason, or would you legally force people to work in that situation, even if they aren't claiming benefits?To throw it out there, I hate the welfare state in Britain and am so against most welfare in the country. If a person who is 16 can work then they should. That goes up to the age of 65.Would that include people in further education (i.e. 6th form or Uni)? Even people persuing degrees that would not make them more marketable in regards to the workplace? Should people not have freedom to do what they want with their lives, even if that includes not working (for whatever reason)? Going further, should dedicated stay-at-home housewives (without children) be forced into work?
(Thank you for shortening xD)
Yes, even if you only working for a few hours a week. It's better than nothing. No, I don't believe so. If you are able to work then you should be because society revolves around everyone working together.
You have me there, though. It depends really on what they actually do at home and of course, that's too hard to monitor.
Oh, and would you include the mega-rich who wish to retire at like 35, and live off their wealth for the rest of their life?
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/19877meme.png)
tfw you meme too hard
You know that thinking of human beings as just an economic value is borderline sociopathic, right? People aren't killing themselves because they're "down" or because of their "lack of motivation". They have a mental illness. The attitude towards mental health in the UK is ****ing abhorrent. People with depression are just considered to be lazy; they're blamed for an illness that they cannot control. It's not someone's fault that they feel they are in a situation where suicide is the only option. If you want to blame anyone, blame the government for the constant under-funding of the mental health department and the consistent cuts to it despite the fact that suicide rates have increased exponentially over the past 3 years. I honestly don't know how you can say you've been there and then regard someone who kills themselves as being selfish, without the slightest bit of empathy.Suicide however, is done by people who can still work. They should be working to help the economy, not ending their life because they are down. Everyone can become depressed sometimes in their life, you need to fight through it. Not give up and let others suffer because of your lack of self-motivation.
out of all the retarded sh** i've seen on gtm, this is probably the most retarded
Opinions are great, aren't they?
I honestly don't know how you can say you've been there and then regard someone who kills themselves as being selfish, without the slightest bit of empathy.^^^^^^^^^^^^^
fought along different lines:That's still a rather insensitive statement. That insinuates you just leave suicidal people on their own with no help and would prefer to associate with those that don't have suicidal tendencies (rubbish robot combat pun kinda not intended, soz). I'm sure you don't mean to come across this way, but try to pick your words carefully before you start debating (especially if you wanna be a politician :P).
"We shouldn't care about whether others want to commit suicide because it's easier just to let themselves do it and move on to another person."
@mouldy does he own his own life tho, is suicide a violation of NAP?No because bodily autonomy.
Is suicide without getting prior permission from all the cells in your body a violation of NAP?@mouldy does he own his own life tho, is suicide a violation of NAP?No because bodily autonomy.
it's not suicide if you're already dead on the inside :cool::mrgreen:
First time I've ever done one of these.communist? (https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/4350reallymakesyouthink.png)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/34216asdf2.PNG)
Well, lets say I'm a little idealistic in my beliefs.
Edit: I will say that I didn't fully understand everything and that it's pretty ridiculous that I maxed out the left side.
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.I don't understand why you wouldn't want suicide to be legal, like... what are you gonna do, throw the corpse in jail? Oh, that'll teach it a lesson :dumb)
A thing I do not get is how suicide is illegal whencyoucare dead at the end.
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.I don't understand why you wouldn't want suicide to be legal, like... what are you gonna do, throw the corpse in jail? Oh, that'll teach it a lesson :dumb)
idk it's 2am and I'm tired, I'll fill this in tomorrow
No. There shouldn't. Easy as that.
Should we impose mandatory castration for white cis males? I mean its just an opinion guysNo. There shouldn't. Easy as that.
yesShould we impose mandatory castration for white cis males? I mean its just an opinion guysNo. There shouldn't. Easy as that.
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/268063211738234881.png)
Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.I don't understand why you wouldn't want suicide to be legal, like... what are you gonna do, throw the corpse in jail? Oh, that'll teach it a lesson :dumb)
idk it's 2am and I'm tired, I'll fill this in tomorrow
It's about the act of trying to do it. Should there be a punishment for it if you try?
No victim, no crime.
hurting someone's feelings != crimeNo victim, no crime.
Eh, it isn't quite the victimless crime it appears to be on the surface. There can be a significant amount of emotional trauma inflicted on friends and family.
Get to the point where life is going so badly wrong that you'd rather end your own existence than suffer through another day: Not a victim.
Know someone who tried to kill themselves: The real victim.
mmmokay
David Mitchell said a great thing about timorous and reckless people on WILTY. He said warnings are put in place in order to create order for the reckless people. However, that leaves the timorous ones in a state of 'perpetual terror'. So, I think that, even though rehab is very good and should be used with prisoners, I do believe punishment should exist as a deterrent to even commit any crime. So, in the end, in theory, all the timorous people won't even consider committing a crime, whilst the reckless ones are significantly deterred.Some of the questions are better but it's a pain in the arse when they ask you how you feel about 2 things in the same question, an example being, "Do you think that euthanasia and suicide should be legal?". I agree with one but not the other.I don't understand why you wouldn't want suicide to be legal, like... what are you gonna do, throw the corpse in jail? Oh, that'll teach it a lesson :dumb)
idk it's 2am and I'm tired, I'll fill this in tomorrow
It's about the act of trying to do it. Should there be a punishment for it if you try?
Punishment as a result of crime is an antiquated system anyways. In a significant number (not all) cases, some form of rehabilitation would be much more productive.
hurting someone's feelings != crimehttp://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html (http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html)
Get to the point where life is going so badly wrong that you'd rather end your own existence than suffer through another day: Not a victim.
David Mitchell said a great thing about timorous and reckless people on WILTY. He said warnings are put in place in order to create order for the reckless people. However, that leaves the timorous ones in a state of 'perpetual terror'. So, I think that, even though rehab is very good and should be used with prisoners, I do believe punishment should exist as a deterrent to even commit any crime. So, in the end, in theory, all the timorous people won't even consider committing a crime, whilst the reckless ones are significantly deterred.
I should've said IMO. I'm fully aware that hurting someone's feefees can be a criminal offense. I think that that is really stupid, even in extreme cases.hurting someone's feelings != crimehttp://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html (http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html)
"...the actor must intend to cause severe emotional distress or know that severe emotional distress is likely to occur."Get to the point where life is going so badly wrong that you'd rather end your own existence than suffer through another day: Not a victim.
This isn't really what I meant.David Mitchell said a great thing about timorous and reckless people on WILTY. He said warnings are put in place in order to create order for the reckless people. However, that leaves the timorous ones in a state of 'perpetual terror'. So, I think that, even though rehab is very good and should be used with prisoners, I do believe punishment should exist as a deterrent to even commit any crime. So, in the end, in theory, all the timorous people won't even consider committing a crime, whilst the reckless ones are significantly deterred.
This is why i said some but not all. Was simply stating that punishment wasn't the only or best answer.
I should've said IMO. I'm fully aware that hurting someone's feefees can be a criminal offense. I think that that is really stupid, even in extreme cases.hurting someone's feelings != crimehttp://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html (http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress.html)
"...the actor must intend to cause severe emotional distress or know that severe emotional distress is likely to occur."Get to the point where life is going so badly wrong that you'd rather end your own existence than suffer through another day: Not a victim.
This isn't really what I meant.David Mitchell said a great thing about timorous and reckless people on WILTY. He said warnings are put in place in order to create order for the reckless people. However, that leaves the timorous ones in a state of 'perpetual terror'. So, I think that, even though rehab is very good and should be used with prisoners, I do believe punishment should exist as a deterrent to even commit any crime. So, in the end, in theory, all the timorous people won't even consider committing a crime, whilst the reckless ones are significantly deterred.
This is why i said some but not all. Was simply stating that punishment wasn't the only or best answer.
(https://i.yuki.la/pol/1478039351903.jpg)WELL IMAGJUN MY SHOK
LEFTISTS.
Didn't screenshot my compass test but it was Geice's, except a bit closer to the center.I'm becoming less authoritarian but more right wing, even tho I've landed in the centre (on the left/right spectrum, at least)
[ This attachment cannot be displayed inline in 'Print Page' view ]based neoliberal gang.
I don't know what it means, but I'm apparently this:it means you don't spend enough time on woke twitter
[ This attachment cannot be displayed inline in 'Print Page' view ]
8values is jreg approvedI don't know what it means, but I'm apparently this:it means you don't spend enough time on woke twitter
[ This attachment cannot be displayed inline in 'Print Page' view ]
also politicalcompass is ass, real enlightened youtube scientists use 8/9values or smthing