What's wrong with Best New Tournament Host?
I'd keep the "Most likely to stay on-topic" Award. I can see the reasoning why you'd remove it, but I feel it positively rewards those who contribute to the topic at hand. Other than that, everything looks pretty good.
Also, I mentioned this in the Discord chat, but I feel I can get a clearer answer here: Would it be alright if I made badges/tags for each award? For people to put in their signature or something like that? I feel it can give some sort of flair and whatnot to these. If you do want me to, then I'll give an example of what I'm talking about in a PM or however you prefer. If not then it's fine.
favorite dsl, ironforge, and reetooled builder could all be compiled into favorite dsl-s builder imo, since none of metas have seen that much individual activity in 2016.
Agreed, just make the categories Favorite IRL builder, Favorite Standard Builder, and favorite Unrealistic builder. That's a better reflection of how the community is divided now.favorite dsl, ironforge, and reetooled builder could all be compiled into favorite dsl-s builder imo, since none of metas have seen that much individual activity in 2016.
Now this is an idea I really like. Maybe replace stock with unrealistic too.
Yeah, please keep it :PWhat's wrong with Best New Tournament Host?
I drafted this up a few months back when we'd had basically 0 new hosts. Maybe it's worth keeping it around now.
do i play dsl for the first time in 6 months in order to keep the title or do i play a fun game insteadPlay Ironforge. It's better for DSL-S anyways
A small suggestion - make 'Most Unique Bots' singular and have people vote for the most unique bot made this year.
And in addition to having 'Best Standard/Unrealistic/IRL Builder', have a bot version too?
It feels a little odd that we recognise the builder but not the bot. it comes off as "Well done, you're the best ___ builder, but eh, who cares what the actual bots were that made people make their decision."I see nothing wrong with that, tbh. Seems needless to recognise every single bot that made you vote for them because it could be an entire showcase worth of stuff.
Add best replica builder!
Well who knows... Maybe i win (surely not).. i mean look at my bots!Add best replica builder!
So you like losing to Sonny?
Replicas should be irl by nature as far as I'm concerned so can come under that.
Maybe best irl and non-irl tournament would be cool though, what do people think to that?
Replicas should be irl by nature as far as I'm concerned so can come under that.
Maybe best irl and non-irl tournament would be cool though, what do people think to that?
What's the major difference? IRL events have more show-y entries, but each one thrives off of good competitors and tight matches.
irl tournaments belong in the trashReplicas should be irl by nature as far as I'm concerned so can come under that.
Maybe best irl and non-irl tournament would be cool though, what do people think to that?
What's the major difference? IRL events have more show-y entries, but each one thrives off of good competitors and tight matches.
I think we should get rid of a lot of the awards that pretty much involve attacking someone like "most annoying" and such, seems out of spirit of the awardsAll of the ones highlighted in red are the ones that Craaig is suggesting to get rid of. Pretty much all of the attacking ones are included in that.
other than that looks :thumbup
haha noWhy not?
I think we should get rid of a lot of the awards that pretty much involve attacking someone like "most annoying" and such, seems out of spirit of the awardsAll of the ones highlighted in red are the ones that Craaig is suggesting to get rid of. Pretty much all of the attacking ones are included in that.
other than that looks :thumbup
Will there be any special eligibility requirements for the Hall of Fame?Yes:
Not me.
1. it'd give people who ran standard tournaments a chance to win an award even if not many people entered them
2. irl is all about the cool designs and production.
Will there be any special eligibility requirements for the Hall of Fame?
haha noWhy not?
(Read it as i almost posted one
That's something I'd like to hear feedback on. Don't really want to say 'they don't have to be completed' when I may be biased in that sense.Maybe a tourney may be nominated if they have gotten through at least the first round.
That's something I'd like to hear feedback on. Don't really want to say 'they don't have to be completed' when I may be biased in that sense.Tbh, I think they do have to be finished. For example, although GTMRW has great production quality, I don't think it's so far into the tournament that it could be deemed the best tourney of 2016.
I think they should be completed before the awards start, and any tournaments that end after the time awards open would be eligible for next years awards.
Remember kids, N00B Warz V was great!i know ;)
Remember kids, N00B Warz V was great!Yeah it was great