Text Only | Text with Attachments

gametechmods

Off-Topic => Off-Topic Discussion => Topic started by: Jack Daniels on May 15, 2010, 01:43:13 PM

Title: Clash of the Titans
Post by: Jack Daniels on May 15, 2010, 01:43:13 PM
Just went out and saw this last night.

It was so terrible. Forced, over-blown, acting. Little to no depth. Waaaaaay too much crammed into 2 hours of film storytelling. It's pretty sad that I thought "Percy Jackson / Lightning thief" was actually a better, more likeable movie. (saw that a couple weeks ago).  If you want big monsters that go "Rwar!" and lots of CGI, then Clash is your kinda movie.

I am hoping that Robin Hood will be awesome when I go see that probably next week.

Anyone else see Clash?
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: S.T.C. on May 15, 2010, 02:30:17 PM
I saw it in 3D, it had NO effects whatsoever, it could've been better but it looks like they put too many things and edited it poorly.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: lloopp D lloopp on May 15, 2010, 02:33:06 PM
I'm seeing Robin Hood tomorrow.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: G.K. on May 15, 2010, 02:34:34 PM
I'm in Robin Hood in the summer.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: System32 on May 15, 2010, 03:32:59 PM
I don't register acting, so I don't usually think of many movies as bad, unless it has B-movie acting.
 
"DID ANYONE ORDER A LARGE HAM?"
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: toAst on May 16, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
the trailer looked like lord of the rings meets 300 with giant flaming cgi garbage everywhere. why spend ten dollars when i could strip naked, burn the money and throw it at my friends for the same price and twice the entertainment value. and my balls aren't cgi, either.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: Jack Daniels on May 16, 2010, 08:53:04 PM
Quote from: toAst on May 16, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
the trailer looked like lord of the rings meets 300 with giant flaming cgi garbage everywhere. why spend ten dollars when i could strip naked, burn the money and throw it at my friends for the same price and twice the entertainment value. and my balls aren't cgi, either.

Oh, the mental image assault is a bit overwhelming with this. I am tempted to whip something up with photoshop... but, alas, it is time to get some rest.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: DuckRA2 on May 16, 2010, 10:52:20 PM
the 3d gave my an earache or somehinthg
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: Sage on May 17, 2010, 10:45:06 PM
3D sucked. Had some epic moments.

Percy Jackson was better.
Title: Re: Clash of the Titans
Post by: Thyrus on May 17, 2010, 10:52:43 PM
Quote from: Sage on May 17, 2010, 10:45:06 PM
3D sucked.

I saw it. the only thing I liked was that Djin and Io
Text Only | Text with Attachments