gametechmods

Off-Topic => Games => Existing Games => Topic started by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:30:08 PM

Title: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:30:08 PM
Hey, I've got a little Idea: Game Reviews! For this demo, I'm gonna be doing Sonic The Hedgehog. You can do your reviews in whatever style you want.
Sonic The Hedgehog (Genesis) (1991):

Sonic The Hedgehog for the Sega Genesis. Oh man, where do I begin!? This game is the game which started it all, stood up to Nintendo, and kicked them square in the balls whilst doing it. With great platforming, and some solid controls, it's no wonder why this game is so popular.

The game starts up on Green Hill Zone, and what a zone it is! With great graphics, some great music, and some simple level design, it's a great starter level for beginners. Running really fast and then jumping on a fish's head at the exact moment? Oh man, it never gets old. A creepy feeling of nostalgia washes over you as you play this, and it's no surprise, as this game is AWESOME. It also has some good sound effects, and really holds a sweet spot in my heart. The loops and that wied S tube in the middle of the stage are very cool, and the tube especially adds a much needed injection of speed into the game. However, and I don't know why, but the level seems slow and drawn-out to me. It's like a baby: you have to cherish it and bring it up before it truly stands up and lives to it's reputation, and that really slows down the whole thing. Ah well, maybe the next level will be better. The precision jumping on the second level is what ruins it for me. The amount of times i've lost lives on that part is annoying as heck, and ruins the 2nd act. The 3rd act seems to be the first act which is truly a solid, challenging act, and my favourite out of the bunch. Apart from that spike pit at the end, that part sucks. (7/10)

Special Stage: Now THIS is where it's at! With some really relaxing music, a trippy background, and some cool level designs, this one is probably one of my favourite zones in the game. The 50HZ limit actually does the music some justice here, as it sounds a lot more relaxed and mellow, whilst the American version seems a bit rushed. And who can forget the exiting feeling of FINALLY getting a chaos emerald after about 7 tries? Nobody who's played this, that's who. Also, the spinny effect when you DO get a chaos emerald... Oh man. It's so cool. The first level is pretty good, and the second level's OK too, but after that, the learning curve goes all over the shot, and really ruins it. (8/10)

Marble Zone: Well, I must say, the game has taken quite a dramatic turn. The music seems to have gotten slightly worse, and it seems a bit more... dark. It seems like it's slowly but surely getting more mature as it goes. The level has a distinct lack of rings, and seems to have gone for a slightly more darker approach. The caterpillar enemies? Annoying as HELL. I still have no idea how to kill them today. Do you roll into them? Do you jump on the non-spiky part? Do you wait until you get invincibly? I don't know, and without instructions, you can expect to lose a few lives before you figure out EXACTLY how to kill them. However, after about half a minute of happy platforming, you come to a part where you can't go anywhere but backwards. From here on in, the level is a FREAKIN' MAZE, with levels taking MINUTES to complete! I mean for ****'s sake, this is a game about SPEED! Not about mazes! Leave that sorta stuff to Mario or something! Because of the maze, this level gets an unfortunately low (6/10)

Spring Yard Zone: Oh **** yeah! This game has just struck back, full freakin' force! With an accurate balance between challange and skill, this zone is probably the best in the game. There are a few parts where it feels slow, but the fast-paced scenes quickly rub them out. And with crazy half-pipes and stuff everywhere, it's hard NOT to like this! Great graphic design, plus probably the most rocking track in all the game gives this level the impression it will be good, but how does it fare? Well, actually, it's pretty darned good! Good level design and an assortment of enemies coming your way, plus a few maze elements makes this the perfect balance between Marble Zone and Green Hill Zone, and is super-fun, even when slowed down at 50HZ, giving this level a (9/10)

Labyrinth Zone: I never completed this zone. Ever. In fact, i've only gotten up to this level once in my entire life, and i'm 13, but from what I can remember, it was a headache, looked bland, and had annoying music, as well as being an underwater level. But since I can't remember this level too well, i'm not gonna rank it.

FINAL VERDICT: So, in conclusion, the game is actually pretty good. For a 1991 game, it's pretty good, with some extreme speed, cool loops and tubes all over the levels and a great soundtrack, this game could be one of the best in the series. However, this game is not without it's flaws. I'm running the game right now at 50HZ, and it just feels... slow. It feels kinda like it's dragging itself along, bit by bit, and it only truly starts getting fun when you're at top speed, blasting through the levels like their nothing, but when it comes to precision, you have to CAREFULLY and GENTLY mark your exact spot and speed. 1 pixel off, and your ass is going down, and you have to climb all the way back up again. Also, the spike behaviour is EXCRUCIATINGLY BAD! You land in a spike pit: and there's no second chance, it's like the games saying: 'Allright, ya slackin' bastard. Ya got this far, now welcome to die!' However, the game ties together nicely, and even though it has more death-traps than an executioner's dungeon, it lands with a neat (7/10)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Enigm@ on November 24, 2010, 02:31:26 PM
I like the idea of reviews.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 02:31:57 PM
We should have one thread for all reviews.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: GoldenFox93 on November 24, 2010, 02:33:30 PM
You didn't beat Labyrinth Zone? I used to have trouble with that quite a lot...I always drowned.

But recently, I played through the game again, and finished it with all Six Chaos Emeralds, without using a continue  :D
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on November 24, 2010, 02:34:14 PM
Can we just make this a review thread for all games? I feel like doing an Okami review.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:35:29 PM
Can we just make this a review thread for all games? I feel like doing an Okami review.

Sure. Chang'd.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: G.K. on November 24, 2010, 02:37:38 PM
There is a thread alreasy.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:41:08 PM
There is a thread alreasy.

Link?
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 02:53:28 PM
Name says all.


Battlfield 1943
Console: XBLA, PSN, Windows


Bringing the series back to its WWII roots, Battlefield 1943 is a must-buy DLC game for any FPS fan.


It takes place in the pacific, including Iwo Jima and Wake Island. You either play as the US marines or the Imperial Japanese Army. The objective is to capture bases across the large maps. You can also win by depleting the enemy's reinforcements bar, that depletes after someone dies and respawns. The gameplay is very forgiving, giving you unlimited explosives (though they require a short waiting time), and regenerating health.


With that being said, the game is made more difficult to counter that. You can be killed easily, and the reload times are short. Also, there are only three classes. The scout class has a sniper rifle and TNT. The infantry class has a sub machine gun, a bazooka, and a wrench to repair vehicles


The game has a lot of variety. You can drive tanks and jeeps, as well as boats and planes. Also, a majority of the buildings can be destroyed (probably all of them, but I'm not sure). At the end of the match, the map really feels like a battlefield. Sadly, there are only three maps to play on, plus one "air superiority" map, with air combat only.


My score will be a an 8.9/10. The game is really diverse, but very difficult and a lack of maps to play on.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: powerrave on November 24, 2010, 02:53:31 PM
and i have an entire review section on my forum. surely you've already seen it, Potepx.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 02:54:34 PM
There is a thread alreasy.

Link?


https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5267.0.html (https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5267.0.html)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:56:55 PM
There is a thread alreasy.

Link?


https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5267.0.html (https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5267.0.html)

YOU JUST MADE THAT A MINUTE AGO!
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 02:57:05 PM
There's a thread for this allready...

https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5266.new.html#new (https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,5266.new.html#new)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 02:57:40 PM
No, I made this before you changed your thread's name.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Scorpion on November 24, 2010, 02:58:00 PM
Every sonic game automatically gets 10/10.
That includes sonic 360.

I think I have a review of new super mario bros and sonic rush I had to do for gaming last year, I could put that up if you guys don't mind.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Scorpion on November 24, 2010, 03:00:55 PM
Yous should have just waited for him to change his threads name, it would have been a lot easier.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on November 24, 2010, 03:01:23 PM
Okay, here's my Okami review:

Okami is an underplayed game for the PS2 and Wii. It is a Zelda style adventure game, infamous for its traditional Japanese art style. This gives it a helping hand and makes it easily the prettiest game for the Wii besides Metroid Prime 3. The plot is that you're the Japanese sun god and you've got to stop the resurrected beast Orochi (which you sealed away 100 years earlier) and do some other stuff later. It's well explained and it is very well implemented. You also can pause time and paint an image to use "brush god powers" which allows you to clear obstacles and the like.

Firstly about the gameplay. The game moves at a fairly slick pace with large areas and enemies dotted around, with some dungeon exploring too. The game almost never lags. The control is easy to use. The only difficulty you may find is that the camera is at a bad angle very occasionally. Fights are easy and you can get items that just make the game really simple. This is the most prominent problem, the game simply has no difficulty. You get all sorts of items that speeds up progress and some really overpowered items (Exorcism Slip Ls), making the bosses die really fast. On that note the bosses are really simple, other than Blight, which may pose a slight challenge. Also a great deal of the enemies can be taken out really easily.
The music in the game is great. It seriously is amazing, with orchestral Japanese style music.
Dungeon reviews:
The Ruins: This is simple, you just head from place to place using some transport power to get from place to place, it is very simple to get around. The boss is insultingly easy if you have Exorcism Slip Ms or better. 7/10 because of the nice original setting.
Wind Temple: Even more simple than the last dungeon, everything you do here is self explanatory. The only puzzle is a moving platform puzzle where you use a wind power to move the platform. 5/10 because of how mediocre it is.
Moon Shrine: This is a very long dungeon and one with some brainpower involved. The boss is fun and very original.
8/10
Emperors Palace: Okay and fun setting but short. Very good boss. 7/10
Oni Island: Pretty much a more platformy version of the Moon Cave with a good boss and a little race mechanic. 8/10
Temple thing: See above, but with two boss fights. 9/10
Overall I think this is a compelling if very easy game worth a good 8.5/10.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Noodle on November 24, 2010, 03:04:36 PM
Every sonic game automatically gets 10/10.

Surely you aren't talking about all the crap they made after Sonic 3, are you?
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Scorpion on November 24, 2010, 03:18:54 PM
Every sonic game automatically gets 10/10.

Surely you aren't talking about all the crap they made after Sonic 3, are you?
Yeah  :bigsmile:
Actually, they did release some undeniabley great sonic games after sonic 3, the new DS games are IMO great aswell, definately in the same league as the other ones.
And IIRC sonic CD was released after sonic 3...
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 03:23:13 PM
I liked Sonic Heroes.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Scorpion on November 24, 2010, 03:29:43 PM
I liked Sonic Heroes.
I played that briefly and thought it was o.k
I even have a soft spot for sonic 360 because me and two of my friends who live very close to me used to meet up at one of theirs house and play the multipayer on that a lot.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 04:01:02 PM
Portal 2

Portal 2 is a truly amazing game, pushing the PC to it's limits, and...

Oh f**k it, Gabe Newell delayed it until April 2011.

F**k you Valve. F**k. You.

FINAL VERDICT: 0/10 because it hasn't been released yet.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Scorpion on November 24, 2010, 04:03:11 PM
F**k you Valve. F**k. You.
I really wouldn't say that, even as a joke.
Those who insult valve feel the full wrath of G-man soon after....
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on November 24, 2010, 04:44:35 PM
No, we feel the wrath of gaben.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAsGQ-h-v0Q&feature=related# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAsGQ-h-v0Q&feature=related#)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: JoeBlo on November 24, 2010, 07:48:45 PM
I merged the two topics.. play nice now you two.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 24, 2010, 08:21:35 PM
I merged the two topics.. play nice now you two.


I got over it like five seconds after it.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: powerrave on November 25, 2010, 12:20:50 PM
i'll give you guys something to read. ain't gonna copy the entire review, so here, a link.

http://www.tales-of-war.com/game-reviews-f37/dirt2-t153.htm (http://www.tales-of-war.com/game-reviews-f37/dirt2-t153.htm)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 27, 2010, 07:34:34 PM
Battlefield Bad Company 2
360, PS3, PC

DICE brings their franchise back to the present day once again. It was good competitor against Modern Warfare 2 when it was released. Did it deserve to be better? Yes.

The singleplayer campaign isn't the best. Bad Company goes off to secure a fictional superweapon created by the Japanese, first discovered in 1944. Even on the easiest difficulty, I found the campaign to be difficult as heck. Enemy fire will easily kill you, and even through cover.

What really makes Bad Company 2 stand out is the multiplayer. There are several different game modes, like conquest, rush, squad rush, and squad deathmatch. The maps are large, detailed, and destructible environments. There are multiple classes can be customized with primary and secondary weapons, equipment, and perks. Note that each class ranks up individually.

The final verdict:

9.2/10

The singleplayer is the only reason why points were taken off. If you buy it, only go for the multiplayer.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on November 29, 2010, 10:54:32 AM
 Bad Company doesn't have Split Screen. That is a major fault, why do you have to have that? You can't play with friends who have a different console so why not have a popular game mode which has been used for about 20 years?
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on November 29, 2010, 03:59:18 PM

I didn't know that.


Medal of Honor


PC, 360, PS3


This is no fantasy. Medal of Honor is based off of what US soldiers were going through in the Middle East. There's been a bit of controversy surrounding the game's multiplayer, but does it still hold up to BC2 and MW2?


Single player isn't the best. I was only able to play a little, because missions drag long and boring.


The multiplayer is completely different, made by the creators of BC2, DICE. US forces versus the Taliban! Oh wait, they changed it to "Opposing Forces". There are only four game modes, Assault Raid, Sector Control, Team Assault and Combat Mission, which can be fought on 8 maps. Two more are included in DLC, but why couldn't they include them during launch?


Like 1943, there are only three classes. The sniper class (self explanatory), includes a sniper rifle (which doesn't start with a proper sniper scope), and explosives. The rifleman class has an assault rifle (with a noob tube), and smoke grenades. Finally, the Special ops class has an SMG, for stealth. Each can be upgraded individually, adding new weapons and upgrades.


The spawning system is somewhat better than in Call of Duty. You have the choice of spawning in your team's base, or on the front. The front is littered with campers, and wide open spaces where you will be sniped in the face. One thing that is a complete annoyance is trying to leave back to the main menu. You cannot leave after a game, but have to wait until the next match starts. Why? How could they screw up something so simple?


Final thoughts?


7.6/10


Terrible singleplayer, and a flawed multiplayer.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on March 11, 2011, 12:57:09 PM
People FORGOT THIS!?
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: GoldenFox93 on March 11, 2011, 01:21:34 PM
I liked Sonic Heroes.
I played that briefly and thought it was o.k
I even have a soft spot for sonic 360 because me and two of my friends who live very close to me used to meet up at one of theirs house and play the multipayer on that a lot.
"I'll punch this thing with my FISTS!"
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on March 11, 2011, 03:06:57 PM
I suppose I should do one.

Here we go, it's a review for Mass Effect 2.

This game is probably the fullest you will have played in a long time. Jam packed with sidequests, main missions, hidden items, DLC, characters and plot points, this is one game that wil steal weeks from you. It follows a shooter style with tonnes of RPG elements making it one diverse game. These elements combine into one furiously effective system. It doesn't give you no win situations; you have the cover system, which you either despise or like, and it gives you a second person view point and 3 party members. So, lets get specific.

Playstyle and variables:
You get a choice of character type at the beginning of the game; Vanguard, Infiltrator, Sentinel, Adept, Engineer and Soldier. The classes have different abilities (or none at all, but few weaknesses in the case of the soldier); Tech and Biotic, and these allow you to change the battle. For biotic, think the force; tech is self explanatory. This allows you to change battles in various ways, but it also decides what weapons you can use. Most can use sniper rifles, pistols and sub-machine guns, while the Vanguard can use shotguns and the Soldier can use al weapons other than the Sub-machine gun, which is replaced by the assault rifle. You get different versions of the weapons throughout the game, usually progressing in strength, until you get powerful weapons such as the M-27 Revenant or the Geth Pulse Rifle. You also research weapons throughout the game, such as a miniature Nuke Launcher.

Levels:
The levels are mostly abandoned planets, with a few hub worlds like Citadel, Illium and Omega. This may sound unrealistic, but you find occupants in most planets and the level design is made of twisting paths, covered areas and Geth ships. In addition you also get plenty of cover from enemy fire. Always fair, always well designed.
Scripting:
A good mix here, with some hilarious dialogue and some pretty serious stuff. Being rather sci-fi, there's a bit of technical jargon thrown in; swearing too.

Final score-
9.5/10
The best RPG/Shooter on PS3, one of the best on PC. Buy it now!
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 11, 2011, 03:12:52 PM
Hm.

Halo Reach,

Right.

Campaign: 7/10 Decent, like, but it was a bit repetetive and the whole 'EVERE1 DIEZZ' thing is a bit silly to be honest. if there were to be all but 1 or two it would make it a lot better and branch out the sequel possibilities anymore. like a 'origins' sort of thing.

Multiplayer: 8/10 I be liking, but some modes are just lame (Arena)

Forge: 4/10 It Wasn't as good as it was said to be, and they need to release more things maybe in a dlc ofr forge (Like a 'forge pack' thing.)

Overall: 6/10 T'was Good, But it wasnt woirth all the hype...

(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on March 11, 2011, 03:22:53 PM
Hm.

Halo Reach,

Right.

Campaign: 7/10 Decent, like, but it was a bit repetetive and the whole 'EVERE1 DIEZZ' thing is a bit silly to be honest. if there were to be all but 1 or two it would make it a lot better and branch out the sequel possibilities anymore. like a 'origins' sort of thing.

Multiplayer: 8/10 I be liking, but some modes are just lame (Arena)

Forge: 4/10 It Wasn't as good as it was said to be, and they need to release more things maybe in a dlc ofr forge (Like a 'forge pack' thing.)

Overall: 6/10 T'was Good, But it wasnt woirth all the hype...

(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)
I'm glad Mass Effect 2 can't count in that equation as it's a SPS:P
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 11, 2011, 03:29:33 PM
ME2 = I really dont want to play this game because it looks terriblle.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Natef on March 11, 2011, 03:33:10 PM
(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)

I disagree, but that's not important right now.

Toy Soldiers DLC

Kaiser Battles-

The easier out of the two, and is alright. Nothing real special besides new unit skins.

8/10

Invasion!

This one is awesome. WWI weapons versus futuristic vehicles and other toys? How can you not go wrong! Invasion! is more challenging than the other, with massive waves of enemies.

9/10
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on March 11, 2011, 03:49:28 PM
ME2 = I really dont want to play this game because it looks terriblle.
It isn't a generic shooter, and it isn't by any means normal, but it is hecka good. It won the most game of the year awards for a reason:P
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 11, 2011, 03:54:24 PM
(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)

I disagree,


I repeat, most.
and toiy soldiers was beatsly.

@Madman , Some beastly piles of sh** won awards this year aswell not always games either. take a look at avatar. NEARLY 3 HOURS OF OVERSIZED PONYTAILED SMURFS KIGHTING EACHOTHER. they won loads of crap. so did 'the kings speech' WAT IS THIS CRAP, SOME DUDE TALKING ABOUT sh** FOR 2 HOURS. see where i'm comings from? its a very sketchy opinion, but it proves my point.

And ME2 is a decent game, i would just be dissapointed by it,.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: GoldenFox93 on March 11, 2011, 03:57:48 PM
(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)

I disagree,


I repeat, most.
and toiy soldiers was beatsly.

@Madman , Some beastly piles of sh** won awards this year aswell not always games either. take a look at avatar. NEARLY 3 HOURS OF OVERSIZED PONYTAILED SMURFS KIGHTING EACHOTHER. they won loads of crap. so did 'the kings speech' WAT IS THIS CRAP, SOME DUDE TALKING ABOUT sh** FOR 2 HOURS. see where i'm comings from? its a very sketchy opinion, but it proves my point.

And ME2 is a decent game, i would just be dissapointed by it,.
I doubt you've even seen the King's Speech. Far too sophisticated for the likes of you, methinks.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: madman3 on March 11, 2011, 04:00:22 PM
(Still the best FPS of 2010. most of the 2010 games were sh**.)

I disagree,


I repeat, most.
and toiy soldiers was beatsly.

@Madman , Some beastly piles of sh** won awards this year aswell not always games either. take a look at avatar. NEARLY 3 HOURS OF OVERSIZED PONYTAILED SMURFS KIGHTING EACHOTHER. they won loads of crap. so did 'the kings speech' WAT IS THIS CRAP, SOME DUDE TALKING ABOUT sh** FOR 2 HOURS. see where i'm comings from? its a very sketchy opinion, but it proves my point.

And ME2 is a decent game, i would just be dissapointed by it,.
Both of those films are opposite sides of extremes. Avatar is more about the visual experience. It sucked plot wise but it looked great. King's Speech is good for a different reason. It is a matter of opinion.

ME2 is not for mainstream shooter fans, but if you've played Dragon Age Origins or KotOR it will blow your balls off.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Enigm@ on March 11, 2011, 04:37:15 PM
Doom II: Hell On Earth for the PC
Best game ever. 'Nuff said.
10/10
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 11, 2011, 05:01:42 PM
Nintendogs
0/10
sh**RFJ
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: GoldenFox93 on March 11, 2011, 05:08:24 PM
Nintendogs
0/10
sh**RFJ
You're not doing it right- having an opinion is fine, but you've got to provide reasons and justification why.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 11, 2011, 05:13:38 PM
Nintendogs
0/10
sh**RFJ
You're not doing it right- having an opinion is fine, but you've got to provide reasons and justification why.
Okay.

1.Boring as heck
2.Repetitive
3.Therer was like 4 different ames when you could get all the dogs on each one anyway.
cba with anymore, am going bed.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on March 11, 2011, 05:18:14 PM
Explain why it got approx. 82% from game critics then. Also, explain how you give it 0% when a TRIANGULAR WHITE TRIANGLE GOT 3%
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Resetti's Replicas on March 04, 2012, 12:39:06 AM
megabump, I actually did a review for a reviewer contest a while back.  The proprietor's computer broke, so it'll be a long time before he judges my video.  If I win this contest I stand to gain some unsaleable fanart from his wife. 

If you've ever wanted to hear my lovely voice for approx 10 minutes straight, this is your chance.  The review may come across as quirky, that's because he made us follow his rules to the letter, which were:


Also I don't give the game a number score at the end, I thought I should alert you to that since that seems to be a trend here.  Enjoy, wish me luck in the contest:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws) 
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: TeamXtreemer on March 04, 2012, 08:24:48 AM
megabump, I actually did a review for a reviewer contest a while back.  The proprietor's computer broke, so it'll be a long time before he judges my video.  If I win this contest I stand to gain some unsaleable fanart from his wife. 

If you've ever wanted to hear my lovely voice for approx 10 minutes straight, this is your chance.  The review may come across as quirky, that's because he made us follow his rules to the letter, which were:


Also I don't give the game a number score at the end, I thought I should alert you to that since that seems to be a trend here.  Enjoy, wish me luck in the contest:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws)
That's a great review, covers all the main points, makes me wanna play it now!
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: DigiWolfeh on March 05, 2012, 07:31:29 AM
How about Mother 3? That game is quite long, but underrated. I might do a review of that later, might.

Sorry for the useless post. xD
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Resetti's Replicas on May 03, 2012, 05:33:24 PM

megabump, I actually did a review for a reviewer contest a while back.  The proprietor's computer broke, so it'll be a long time before he judges my video.  If I win this contest I stand to gain some unsaleable fanart from his wife. 

If you've ever wanted to hear my lovely voice for approx 10 minutes straight, this is your chance.  The review may come across as quirky, that's because he made us follow his rules to the letter, which were:


Also I don't give the game a number score at the end, I thought I should alert you to that since that seems to be a trend here.  Enjoy, wish me luck in the contest:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvmH3Sa-JMs&feature=plcp&context=C37d4a90UDOEgsToPDskLswV2RcJZRFBwyyzJIb0cm#ws) 


Ok, so the results of the reviewer contest are in.  Out of 21 reviewers, I took 4th place.  Would have loved first place, but the three guys that beat me were all full-time game reviewers, and I concede that their videos were more engaging than mine.  Even so, I did the best out of all 18 people who didn't show their face, I'll happily accept first place in the "didn't show face on camera" division.  I also got voted #1 by one of the eight judges (ballots were anonymous so I don't know which), that made me happy. 


All in all, I'm happy with this little venture, and will definitely be twisting the proprietor's arm until he agrees to a seventh review contest.  Not sure if I'll do more reviews just for fun, let me know if you'd watch that kind of thing on my channel.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: DigiWolfeh on May 09, 2012, 04:03:21 AM
Well, nice try at least. I should probably do a review of something,considering IGN are biased.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Mecha on May 09, 2012, 10:37:06 AM
Well, nice try at least. I should probably do a review of something,considering IGN are biased.
Yeah, all they like is:
CALLL OF DUTTTYYYY MANNN!!!!111 YAEHHHH ITSSS THEE ELTES!!!!111 BAST GAMEMMME EVARARA!!!!!111
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Hard Bot on May 09, 2012, 08:40:26 PM
*=GRAN TURISMO 5=*
Gran Turismo 5 is the BIGGEST of the Gran Turismos, and possibly the BIGGEST videogame ever made.

GRAPHICS=10/10-- It will only get better! Gran Turismo 5's graphics have been proven to be duller than Forza Motorsport 4's, but they SUPERIOR to most-other sim racers. Please just L@@k @ this:
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/18070gran-turismo-5-20100920070525615-3314189.jpg)
*image courtesy of IGN.com*

SOUND=8/10-- The soundtrack consists of rock, alternate, and dance/electronic(YAY no pop music) for races. For menus is jazz, lounge and classical(You feel nostalagic listens to that.) The dance/eltronic music is actauly of electronica, basically techno'd jazz.

GAMEPLAY=10/10-- IT HAZ 1072 CARZ!1!1!1!1!11!!, but most of it is just Nissan Skylines. 5 tiers of carrer mode and 3 dealerships.

STORY=9/10= NO story and that's how racing games SHOULD be.

FINAL VERDICT= Superb game. If you have a PS3 and in to sim games, this is DEFINATE buy. Hard Bot's grade: A

oFFICAL CAR LIST:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=gt5+car+list&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CGYQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gran-turismo.com%2Flocal%2Fjp%2Fdata1%2Fproducts%2Fgt5%2Fcarlist_en.html&ei=zxyrT738CaOj2QWWxZSmAg&usg=AFQjCNFvntzJ3tG_mPtjrDsBvioxjHXgCA (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=gt5+car+list&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CGYQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gran-turismo.com%2Flocal%2Fjp%2Fdata1%2Fproducts%2Fgt5%2Fcarlist_en.html&ei=zxyrT738CaOj2QWWxZSmAg&usg=AFQjCNFvntzJ3tG_mPtjrDsBvioxjHXgCA)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on May 09, 2012, 09:19:54 PM
Well, it's been a long time since I've done one of these. And, since I'm feeling nostalgic, I'm playing something from the 90's. So, bust out your Palm Pilots and get out your indoor sunglasses, 'cause we're gonna play...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gZrnEARFeA# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gZrnEARFeA#)

Ah yes, Tomb Raider. The theme alone make me feel nostalgic. The sheer atmosphere created when playing this game is incomparable to any other franchise. The original 4, Plus Legend on the PS2, remain a solid benchmark in my childhood.

Graphics - 8/10 - this game's graphics were jaw-dropping when it came out in 1996. The areas are detailed and atmospheric, with the music (or sometimes lack of) simply adding to the game's style. There are a few places where the graphics can be a bit skew-whiff, but it's a very well built game.

Sound - 7/10 - The soundtrack for this game is something of admiration to me. From the Opening Song to the final battle, the soundtrack doesn't accompany your emotions, but rather accompanies the character's emotions, making a more solid bond with said character. There are places where the music feels out of place, and at that point is where the game falls short; but, when the music does fit, it leads for an either chilling or high-octane experience.

Gameplay - 4/10 - The gameplay in this game is where the game falls a bit short, for me at least. The controls are clunky and the hard to get accustomed to. But, I can't really hold any grudges; this game was made before Dualshock came out, so you can expect the clunkiness that usually comes with analog play. Like I said, the controls and finnicky, but after a few minutes of play, you adapt to them, and begin to learn the intricacies of the game not via tutorial, but via simple human discovery, much like how Lara Croft discovers the Scion. The gameplay and difficulty of this game can be punishing at times, and melodic at others; there is no set-out difficulty curve, and that can lead to some finnicky moments, plus with the controls... Ehh, I'm don't really like it.

Story - 10/10 - The story is amazing. It's no cardboard cut-out 'Hurr stop a villian' either. It has a deep, engaging storyline that has Lara Croft traveling around the world to stop an immortal Atlantean demon, named Natla, from taking over existence. Not just the world, but existence. The storyline has you going through countless goons of Natla, but with each one having their own distinct reasons, and each one being kind of connectable with. It's like the Hunger Games; when the hero kills somebody in the Hunger Games, you don't feel a sense of accomplishment, you feel a sense of sadness for the simple fact that he had to such a thing, and Tomb Raider had that 16 years prior. The storyline is perfect, and I can't think of any way to improve it.

FINAL SCORE:

Graphics: 8
Sound: 7
Gameplay: 4
Story: 10

OVERALL SCORE: 7/10 (A-)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: Alphasim on May 09, 2012, 11:58:28 PM
Does this count? (http://e-aagh.net) I've been reviewing games for about eight years now on my site.
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: FOTEPX on May 10, 2012, 12:32:53 AM
Does this count? (http://e-aagh.net) I've been reviewing games for about eight years now on my site.

Yeah, that counts. Actually, that's not a half bad review you've got there. That Portal 2 is so relateable.

(Someonepleasetrymymaps)
Title: Re: Video Game Reviews
Post by: DigiWolfeh on May 10, 2012, 04:30:53 AM
Does this count? (http://e-aagh.net) I've been reviewing games for about eight years now on my site.

Yeah, that counts. Actually, that's not a half bad review you've got there. That Portal 2 is so relateable.

(Someonepleasetrymymaps)

No one's gonna try your maps bro xD