BLOOD ON SCREEN
so real
Actually I was quoting Duty Calls but yeah, you can't really have much creative room when it comes to war shooters. But then, I never understood the appeal of war shooters anyway when you can go over-the-top like Bulletstorm.
Don't think I know what Duty Calls is :/
Fixed your title there.
Limbo, Minecraft, God of War1, 2, 3, Borderlands 1, 2, Warhammer: Dawn of War, Team Fortess 2, Pixeljunk Shooter, Risen 2, Mass Effect 1, 2, 3, Sim City, Marvel vs Capcom, Braid...
This thread is stupid, biased and fails on a logical basis.
I'd like to hear your reasoning, sys.
Fixed your title there.what? you can't tell me that having a bunch of different gaming series all pretty much the same that are flooding the gaming market isn't a bad thing.
Limbo, Minecraft, God of War1, 2, 3, Borderlands 1, 2, Warhammer: Dawn of War, Team Fortess 2, Pixeljunk Shooter, Risen 2, Mass Effect 1, 2, 3, Sim City, Marvel vs Capcom, Braid...
This thread is stupid, biased and fails on a logical basis.
not flooding the market? ok then let's list the modern war shooters for ya...
Counter-strike
Call of Duty
Battlefield
Medal of Honor
Rainbow Six
Ghost Recon
and more...
they pretty much all have a load of squeals too! 6 franchises, all pretty much still releasing games in a single sub-genre. You can quit with the name calling too.
Modern = Check
To do with war = Check
Shooters = check
Modern = Check
To do with war = Check
Shooters = check
Holy heck that is a seriously stupid way to give logic.
You are the dumbest person on GTM. You deserve a medal, and some pop-up books.
LOL THE MARKET IS BEING FLOODED WITH ROBOT GAEMS
Look, Robot Arena, The Robot Wars games, Roboforge, Bot Arena!
Let's see:
Has robots = CHECK
Build robots = CHECK
fight robots = CHECK
SEE TOTALLY FLOODED MARKET DERP LOL
why not try and blend MMORPG elements with shooters? have players group up to take down specific groups etc. and give the bosses more stuff to do instead of just shooting, I mean come on people are more creative then that these days.I believe it's already been done
why not try and blend MMORPG elements with shooters? have players group up to take down specific groups etc. and give the bosses more stuff to do instead of just shooting, I mean come on people are more creative then that these days.I believe it's already been done
My point is they are selling basically the same game to people who continue to fork out money for the same stuff. There is not much changing in the genre so why do people continue to buy the games?
Pokemon has changed over the years, and most the games have added new stuff whether it's breeding, new types of pokemon, a load of new pokemon, a new region with new gyms to battle it's all fresh. You can't imagine an FPS game changing much because they have been stuck for so long now thanks to the modern war/military shooters.
You used Gamespot as a source.
Would you like to top that off with the Daily Mail and Fox news?
I'm clearly not the only person with this opinion is all that's meant to say. There are lots of people out there who want new gameplay not just new skins/maps. Even in world of warcraft people complain when a pvp map is the same game type with only the map changed, it gets very boring.
Actually, Gameplay =/= aesthetics. Your argument is over looks. You cannot seriously bring pokemon (A videogame who's most recent aasthetic change was going 3D) in an argument over looks.
I didn't bring pokemon into the argument >.> that's not even a genre.
Pet training/battle RPGs games have new settings/maps, have new enemies, have new characters, have new skills and even new gameplay.
Military FPS games have new maps, new campaign and sometimes new guns and new multi-player modes. it's more difficult to add new enemies that stand out based on the human race alone, it's had to give players new skills when all the do is shoot stuff.
But even in the RPG market there is some crap :L
It seems the handheld and PC gaming is the way to go lately, consul games are not pulling me like the used to.
The last game I remember buying was Final Fantasy XIII, I sold it because the story didn't hook me and was no challenge at all and I am seeing more games like this...
Planetside I think it is called the MMOFPS
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/7049825275.jpg)
Are we headed for another video game crash?
Are people to silly to realise what crud they are buying?
Why do people buy all these War shooters when they are all pretty much the same game?
Is online gaming to blame due to people thinking they need to keep up to date?
People should stop spending money on the same game and stick to what they have already and get behind innovative games and systems otherwise future generations will have very few choices.
I'm clearly not the only person with this opinion is all that's meant to say. There are lots of people out there who want new gameplay not just new skins/maps. Even in world of warcraft people complain when a pvp map is the same game type with only the map changed, it gets very boring.
Pet training/battle RPGs games have new settings/maps, have new enemies, have new characters, have new skills and even new gameplay.
Military FPS games have new maps, new campaign and sometimes new guns and new multi-player modes. it's more difficult to add new enemies that stand out based on the human race alone, it's had to give players new skills when all the do is shoot stuff.
Brutal honesty.QuoteI'm clearly not the only person with this opinion is all that's meant to say. There are lots of people out there who want new gameplay not just new skins/maps. Even in world of warcraft people complain when a pvp map is the same game type with only the map changed, it gets very boring.
LOL some people have opinions about blacks.
Like you, they are idiots.
QuotePet training/battle RPGs games have new settings/maps, have new enemies, have new characters, have new skills and even new gameplay.
Military FPS games have new maps, new campaign and sometimes new guns and new multi-player modes. it's more difficult to add new enemies that stand out based on the human race alone, it's had to give players new skills when all the do is shoot stuff.
Exactly.
Military FPS is flooding the market as much as Justin bieber is becoming the king dictator of modern music. It isn't happening, it's in your head, something's wrong with you, you are paranoid, THE FREQUENCY OF SOMETHING BEING MENTIONED BY MAINSTREAM DOES NOT IN ANY WAY MEAN THAT THE MARKET IS BEING OVERRUN BY SAID SOMETHING, AND IF YOU DO THINK THAT YOUR OPINION IS STUPID, INVALID AND YOU SHOULDN'T EVER, EVER TELL ANOTHER HUMAN BEING YOUR OPINIONS EVER AGAIN.
and you call my opinion bias...Counter Strike isn't original in setting but works far better than any other FPS and is quite a lot older than the pack of modern FPS currently about.
Modern = Check
To do with war = Check
Shooters = check
quit trying to derail this thread, I'm ignoring you now as I see where you stand on it and will wait to have an intelligent conversation with someone else.
This is just one genre. Genres will always look similar to each other and have similar plotlines. They're called cliches and they suck, but the public like them for some reasonFTFY
Take, for example, the RPG market
Most of the JRPGs out there, especially the famous ones, follow this kind of route:
Normal kid, usually aged 10-13, is tasked with saving the world through some means or another, and does so
This easily fits:
- Golden Sun series
- Pokemon series
- Final Fantasy series
- Digimon series
and debatably fits:
- Luminous Arc series
- Radiant Historia
- Tactics Ogre series
- Dragon Quest series
and many others
The thing that separates these is graphics - some have 2D, some have 3D. Besides that, the core plotline is the same, battles are turn-based, yadda yadda
The point is, nothing's original any more. It's how you wrap up the core with other things, like graphics, sound, other features, gamepaly. That's what makes it unique
And FPS lost that a long time ago, in my opinion
Dunno about Elder Scrolls but the Witcher 2 is a sexy, sexy game. In more ways than one :PThis is just one genre. Genres will always look similar to each other and have similar plotlines. They're called cliches and they suck, but the public like them for some reasonFTFY
Take, for example, the RPG market
Most of the JRPGs out there, especially the famous ones, follow this kind of route:
Normal kid, usually aged 10-13, is tasked with saving the world through some means or another, and does so
This easily fits:
- Golden Sun series
- Pokemon series
- Final Fantasy series
- Digimon series
and debatably fits:
- Luminous Arc series
- Radiant Historia
- Tactics Ogre series
- Dragon Quest series
and many others
The thing that separates these is graphics - some have 2D, some have 3D. Besides that, the core plotline is the same, battles are turn-based, yadda yadda
The point is, nothing's original any more. It's how you wrap up the core with other things, like graphics, sound, other features, gamepaly. That's what makes it unique
And FPS lost that a long time ago, in my opinion
All the good RPGs are western these days, like the Witcher and Elder Scrolls games.
Also, this thread is totally ripped from a Cracked article.
>10-year-old kid sets out to become a Pokemon master by collecting all the gym badges and eventually defeating the Champion. Also, at some point he has to stop an evil team that wants to use Pokemon for nefarious purposes.
My point is they are selling basically the same game to people who continue to fork out money for the same stuff. There is not much changing in the genre so why do people continue to buy the games?
Pokemon has changed over the years
Fallout is a great RPG with a nontraditional setting.Fallout is a little to sanboxy for my liking, but it's still very good.>10-year-old kid sets out to become a Pokemon master by collecting all the gym badges and eventually defeating the Champion. Also, at some point he has to stop an evil team that wants to use Pokemon for nefarious purposes.
My point is they are selling basically the same game to people who continue to fork out money for the same stuff. There is not much changing in the genre so why do people continue to buy the games?
Pokemon has changed over the years
:rolleyes:
Fallout is a great RPG with a nontraditional setting.Fallout is a little to sanboxy for my liking, but it's still very good.>10-year-old kid sets out to become a Pokemon master by collecting all the gym badges and eventually defeating the Champion. Also, at some point he has to stop an evil team that wants to use Pokemon for nefarious purposes.
My point is they are selling basically the same game to people who continue to fork out money for the same stuff. There is not much changing in the genre so why do people continue to buy the games?
Pokemon has changed over the years
:rolleyes:
And yes, I really doubt the "advancement" of Pokemon, it's really not developed beyond any sort of superficial way.
http://www.planetside2.com/ (http://www.planetside2.com/)why not try and blend MMORPG elements with shooters? have players group up to take down specific groups etc. and give the bosses more stuff to do instead of just shooting, I mean come on people are more creative then that these days.I believe it's already been done
A military FPSMMORPG complete different classes, city raids and stuff? please link O.o I was thinking about how the classes would work etc.
-Medic (Med kits/Needles/Injectors, healer/dps)
-Sniper (Sniper rifles, long range burst dps)
-Gunslinger (pistols/revolvers, close range burst dps)
-Heavy gunner (Chainguns/Rocket lauchers, AoE dps/tank)
-Soldier (Machine guns/SMG's, close range sustained dps)
-Demolisher (mines/c-4/grenades, AoE dps/tank)
-Commando (Shotguns/rifles/knives, close range dps)
Fallout is a great RPG with a nontraditional setting.Fallout is a little to sanboxy for my liking, but it's still very good.>10-year-old kid sets out to become a Pokemon master by collecting all the gym badges and eventually defeating the Champion. Also, at some point he has to stop an evil team that wants to use Pokemon for nefarious purposes.
My point is they are selling basically the same game to people who continue to fork out money for the same stuff. There is not much changing in the genre so why do people continue to buy the games?
Pokemon has changed over the years
:rolleyes:
And yes, I really doubt the "advancement" of Pokemon, it's really not developed beyond any sort of superficial way.
I see his point, I still think it would be nice for at least 2 of the developers to stop with the military FPS series and do something different or just make room for other games that don't get recognition because of them. With games like beyond: two souls, last of us and watch dogs coming out I think sales will drop for call of duty etc. then maybe a few of those companies will bring out brand new IPs instead.
Gran Turismo 5 is the game I play when FARM SIMULTAOR is too intense for me.FARMVILLE REQUEST
Gran Turismo 5 is the game I play when FARM SIMULTAOR is too intense for me.FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
FARMVILLE REQUEST
Gran Turismo 5 is the game I play when FARM SIMULTAOR is too intense for me.
Have you ever even played a simulator? You know, a game where absolute concentration is not only needed to keep the thing on the track, but also to overtake cleanly and make consistent times? It is rather difficult, in reality.Gran Turismo 5 is the game I play when FARM SIMULTAOR is too intense for me.
Racing games take so little brainpower to play anyways...
Well what can we do to to change the industry?Indie games.
Well what can we do to to change the industry?Indie games.
My eyes are currently on Overgrowth :P
Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
WoW succeeds because of its longevity.I dunno, I'm never one for MMOs and I think Warcraft 3 is better.
Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
WoW is good and GoW 1 was a great game. You are about as dumb as Ianh.
I agree that quick time events are dumb but the rest of GoW is okay.Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
WoW is good and GoW 1 was a great game. You are about as dumb as Ianh.
God of war is too hard (Who in the world has fingers faster than Sonic the Hedgehog can run?) It would be a great game if they took out the rapid button presses as they render it unbeatable.
World of Warcraft - Too many n00bs (A common ailment of most online gaming (RA2's ailment is epic lag syndrome which is why i never play RA2 online)
World of Warcraft - Too many n00bs
Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
WoW is good and GoW 1 was a great game. You are about as dumb as Ianh.
Ease up mate, I'm not the only one with that opinion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVgXGw_XhRQ&feature=related# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVgXGw_XhRQ&feature=related#)Ease up mate, I'm not the only one with that opinion.
Idiots can come in numbers.
Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
To be honest, people can and will do what they want with their money, and if they just so happen to enjoy games for their multiplayer, then let them have their fun. It isn't really like it is killing the games industry, or anything like that. In fact, I am pretty sure that many of the people who buy CoD are the kinds of people who are either not avid gamers (they are usually into FPSs, or racing games), so they wouldn't buy anything else anyway, and the rest of the people who buy it will be buying other games as well. Besides, I am pretty sure that there are lots of people who play through the single player first, and then play the multiplayer (well, the multiplayer is really the only part that gives CoD any replayability). CoD isn't a bad thing, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that you should try to ruin the fun for people who do (I enjoyed playing the zombie game mode and Spec-Ops with my dad).
Ease up mate, I'm not the only one with that opinion.Everytime a awesome games such as Okami, Enslaved, or Psychonauts come out people go and buy the next stupid $%@# Call of duty, World of Warcraft, God of War or some other mass produced garbage like that. While the truly innovative games never get the sequels they deserve.
WoW is good and GoW 1 was a great game. You are about as dumb as Ianh.
S32, you're kind of being a dick. He's entitled to his own opinion, and you don't need to come here to whine and bitch about it.Anyone who calls God of War sh** is deserving of ridicule.
The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
To be honest, people can and will do what they want with their money, and if they just so happen to enjoy games for their multiplayer, then let them have their fun. It isn't really like it is killing the games industry, or anything like that. In fact, I am pretty sure that many of the people who buy CoD are the kinds of people who are either not avid gamers (they are usually into FPSs, or racing games), so they wouldn't buy anything else anyway, and the rest of the people who buy it will be buying other games as well. Besides, I am pretty sure that there are lots of people who play through the single player first, and then play the multiplayer (well, the multiplayer is really the only part that gives CoD any replayability). CoD isn't a bad thing, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that you should try to ruin the fun for people who do (I enjoyed playing the zombie game mode and Spec-Ops with my dad).
I don't like the negativity that Racing games are getting here.. Carmageddon 1 and GTA 2 got me into gaming.
You said it, not me. But I do agree.S32, you're kind of being a dick. He's entitled to his own opinion, and you don't need to come here to whine and bitch about it.Anyone who calls God of War sh** is deserving of ridicule.
The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
To be honest, people can and will do what they want with their money, and if they just so happen to enjoy games for their multiplayer, then let them have their fun. It isn't really like it is killing the games industry, or anything like that. In fact, I am pretty sure that many of the people who buy CoD are the kinds of people who are either not avid gamers (they are usually into FPSs, or racing games), so they wouldn't buy anything else anyway, and the rest of the people who buy it will be buying other games as well. Besides, I am pretty sure that there are lots of people who play through the single player first, and then play the multiplayer (well, the multiplayer is really the only part that gives CoD any replayability). CoD isn't a bad thing, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that you should try to ruin the fun for people who do (I enjoyed playing the zombie game mode and Spec-Ops with my dad).
I don't like the negativity that Racing games are getting here.. Carmageddon 1 and GTA 2 got me into gaming.
I'm not giving racing games any hate at all, I'm just saying that the people who are not really avid gamers will generally go for FPSs or racing games, no negativity whatsoever (I personally loved the Star Wars racing game for the N64, as well as Crash Team Racing, and even the Muppets racing game for the PS1). I wasn't saying that all people who play racing games and FPSs aren't avid gamers, just that a lot of people that don't play games too often will generally go for FPSs or racing games...maybe some sports games too. Sorry if I said it in a way that could be misinterpreted, I wrote the previous post when I hadn't been up very long, and I apologise if this post makes no sense , but I am still not fully awake.
S32, you're kind of being a dumb. He's entitled to his own opinion, and you don't need to come here to whine about it.Anyone who calls God of War sh** is deserving of ridicule.
The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
To be honest, people can and will do what they want with their money, and if they just so happen to enjoy games for their multiplayer, then let them have their fun. It isn't really like it is killing the games industry, or anything like that. In fact, I am pretty sure that many of the people who buy CoD are the kinds of people who are either not avid gamers (they are usually into FPSs, or racing games), so they wouldn't buy anything else anyway, and the rest of the people who buy it will be buying other games as well. Besides, I am pretty sure that there are lots of people who play through the single player first, and then play the multiplayer (well, the multiplayer is really the only part that gives CoD any replayability). CoD isn't a bad thing, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that you should try to ruin the fun for people who do (I enjoyed playing the zombie game mode and Spec-Ops with my dad).
S32, you're kind of being dumb. He's entitled to his own opinion, and you don't need to come here to whine about it.Anyone who calls God of War sh** is deserving of ridicule. I still agree with this, lulz
I don't recall calling it that :/ You didn't, Courthousedoc did.
@S32 my opinion is that they are milking the modern military shooter genre way to much and should make room for other games, they quit hogging the media and social spotlight. If you don't like my opinion that's fine because everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but calling me an idiot etc. and acting childish is just proving that I have struck a nerve.The real dumb people are the people forking out money for the same game over and over again when they never play anything but the multi-player
To be honest, people can and will do what they want with their money, and if they just so happen to enjoy games for their multiplayer, then let them have their fun. It isn't really like it is killing the games industry, or anything like that. In fact, I am pretty sure that many of the people who buy CoD are the kinds of people who are either not avid gamers (they are usually into FPSs, or racing games), so they wouldn't buy anything else anyway, and the rest of the people who buy it will be buying other games as well. Besides, I am pretty sure that there are lots of people who play through the single player first, and then play the multiplayer (well, the multiplayer is really the only part that gives CoD any replayability). CoD isn't a bad thing, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that you should try to ruin the fun for people who do (I enjoyed playing the zombie game mode and Spec-Ops with my dad).
Not trying to ruin it for anyone, I'm not even saying they're bad games. I just think 6+ series most with sequels all about modern war is pretty excessive and there's a huge lack of creative input on the part of the devs, is like they just copied and pasted. Imagine if The Sims had 4-5 rival games all the same concept and graphical style and they all had at least 5 sequels. Now imagine those games always getting the big game spotlight, you'd get sick of it pretty quick right?
Video game companies need to stop looking at video games as get rich quick schemes and instead focus on what they really should be... Art
Let's make this clear I want to love the God of War franchise but my fingers well they aren't really that fast so I can't do rapid button presses. Ah well guess i could always watch a God of War walkthrough on Youtube but it wont be the same as playing through it.tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiits
Anyway here's an artsy game that I'm currently stuck on
Trailer Park King (Xbox 360 Indie Game)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJTSoqOavNc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJTSoqOavNc#ws)
@S32 my opinion is that they are milking the modern military shooter genre way to much and should make room for other games,
they quit hogging the media and social spotlight.
If you don't like my opinion that's fine because everyone's entitled to their own opinion,
but calling me an idiot etc. and acting childish is just proving that I have struck a nerve
Tribes: AscendGOTTA SANIC FAST
I have to agree with S32. FPS are aall differnent and they're not just handing out the same sh**. And one of the games you featured in OP was Killzone 3. Just beacuse the games look the same does not mean they are. KZ3 has a very unique storyline.
I'm afraid I'm having to disagree to a strong extent with this point. Much while there are unique FPS such as Bulletstorm, it's pretty obvious how the CoD series has simply been performing retreads of previous games with virtually no differences, as with Medal Of Honour, Red Orchestra and some others. While games like Killzone are different in setting the mechanics are almost identical to other FPS in how they play. I do think games like Counter Strike are very different so I'd say it's half and half when it comes to differences.I have to agree with S32. FPS are aall differnent and they're not just handing out the same sh**. And one of the games you featured in OP was Killzone 3. Just beacuse the games look the same does not mean they are. KZ3 has a very unique storyline.
THANK YOU
I don't think so with Red Orchestra. Sure they added a CoD-like game mode, but the main focus on the game is on ultra-realism.Not sure how that makes the game any better :P I play games to have an experience that ISN'T like real life.
Geez guys can we stop the flaming please?Honestly I think the system shock series should be in the smithsonian. I didn't even like bioshack that much..
Anyway FPS's can be art.
I'm sure you heard of Bioshock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWkyMwh8xY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWkyMwh8xY#ws)
I also know of a site where there are some artsy looking games (If you have the paticence to sort through all the trash) including Narbacular Drop (The precursor to Portal & Portal2)
It's a nice change of pace from the less realistic FPS games, and relies on more tactics.Does RO have respawns? It's pretty much the system that cripples almost all FPS.
System Shock is tasty. Has the best gaming villain ever too. System Shock 2 is a lil better IMO.Geez guys can we stop the flaming please?Honestly I think the system shock series should be in the smithsonian. I didn't even like bioshack that much..
Anyway FPS's can be art.
I'm sure you heard of Bioshock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWkyMwh8xY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWkyMwh8xY#ws)
I also know of a site where there are some artsy looking games (If you have the paticence to sort through all the trash) including Narbacular Drop (The precursor to Portal & Portal2)
It's a nice change of pace from the less realistic FPS games, and relies on more tactics.Does RO have respawns? It's pretty much the system that cripples almost all FPS.
Can't say that helps it, especially for a tactical FPS. A lack of respawns works really well in CS/CS:S/CS:GO.It's a nice change of pace from the less realistic FPS games, and relies on more tactics.Does RO have respawns? It's pretty much the system that cripples almost all FPS.
Yes.
@S32 my opinion is that they are milking the modern military shooter genre way to much and should make room for other games,
Your opinion is wrong. I already told you why at the start. You listed Counter strike as an example. What next? Prototype?
Quotethey quit hogging the media and social spotlight.
They aren't hogging anything for gods sake. You literally can't see the media hype for the new PC version of Dark Souls: Prepare To Die, Borderlands 2, Planetside 2, Tribes: Ascend because your massive, cancerous cognitive dissonance is clouding your damn eyes and ears.
QuoteIf you don't like my opinion that's fine because everyone's entitled to their own opinion,
Your opinion is WRONG. It started out as an attempt to be "facts" and you fell back on "lol opinion" as soon as I told you why you are wrong. Saying your opinion does not excuse you of being called an idiot. Having an opinion is not a personal flame shield. Like I said, People also have opinions on blacks. They are idiots too, and I'll happily correct them as well.Quotebut calling me an idiot etc. and acting childish is just proving that I have struck a nerve
It's one thing to claim 2+2 = 5, but falling back to "It's my opinion" and then implying you are correct because YOU KEEP INSISTING ON IT WHICH IS ANNOYING ME?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcjIestFVOc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcjIestFVOc#ws)
@S32 my opinion is that they are milking the modern military shooter genre way to much and should make room for other games,
Your opinion is wrong. I already told you why at the start. You listed Counter strike as an example. What next? Prototype?
Quotethey quit hogging the media and social spotlight.
They aren't hogging anything for gods sake. You literally can't see the media hype for the new PC version of Dark Souls: Prepare To Die, Borderlands 2, Planetside 2, Tribes: Ascend because your massive, cancerous cognitive dissonance is clouding your damn eyes and ears.
QuoteIf you don't like my opinion that's fine because everyone's entitled to their own opinion,
Your opinion is WRONG. It started out as an attempt to be "facts" and you fell back on "lol opinion" as soon as I told you why you are wrong. Saying your opinion does not excuse you of being called an idiot. Having an opinion is not a personal flame shield. Like I said, People also have opinions on blacks. They are idiots too, and I'll happily correct them as well.Quotebut calling me an idiot etc. and acting childish is just proving that I have struck a nerve
It's one thing to claim 2+2 = 5, but falling back to "It's my opinion" and then implying you are correct because YOU KEEP INSISTING ON IT WHICH IS ANNOYING ME?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcjIestFVOc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcjIestFVOc#ws)
dude just shut up seriously, opinions can't be wrong. If you want some facts I'll give you some.
All modern military shooters...
Have the same gameplay.
Have the same setting.
Have the same basic story (omg it's WAR!)
Have the same elitist jerks playing online and bragging to friends about how the pwn noobs.
Have the same weapons.
Have the same enemies, just blokes in army gear.
Again there's like 5 or so series! not games, SERIES! with sequels and expansions... a crudload of expansions! It's friggin' overkill and if you don't think so I feel sorry for you (well not now that you've been acting like a complete douche). If everyone and their mother is going to copy military shooters just for the dollars then gaming is dying. The majority of sheep gamers will continue to buy these bland remakes because in gaming circles it's the "cool" thing to do.
You are blind if you can't see the money milking!!! and they are hogging the spotlight because they are the most talked about games, you always hear about the new battlefield, the new call of duty etc. from friends, online, at E3.. and at stores these games are always on display!
Can't say that helps it, especially for a tactical FPS. A lack of respawns works really well in CS/CS:S/CS:GO.It's a nice change of pace from the less realistic FPS games, and relies on more tactics.Does RO have respawns? It's pretty much the system that cripples almost all FPS.
Yes.
MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
Lol what? it's a military FPS, not a classic arcade shooter.
You're a lost soul if you think MW3 is a classic arcade shooter. This alone renders ANYTHING you say mute!
MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
Lol what? it's a military FPS, not a classic arcade shooter.
You're a lost soul if you think MW3 is a classic arcade shooter. This alone renders ANYTHING you say mute!
No, That's an arcade SHMUP. You can't even get the basics right.
He meant that Modern Warfare 3 is simple and easy to pick and play like an arcade shooter such as Space Invaders..MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
Lol what? it's a military FPS, not a classic arcade shooter.
You're a lost soul if you think MW3 is a classic arcade shooter. This alone renders ANYTHING you say mute!
No, That's an arcade SHMUP. You can't even get the basics right.
MW3 still isn't an arcade game is it? admit you're wrong and get off your high horse mate.
Space invaders is an arcade shooter, it was played in arcades and you shoot... genius... use ya head before you type, or even better don't type at all since all that shows up is utter garbage.
He meant that Modern Warfare 3 is simple and easy to pick and play like an arcade shooter such as Space Invaders..MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
Lol what? it's a military FPS, not a classic arcade shooter.
You're a lost soul if you think MW3 is a classic arcade shooter. This alone renders ANYTHING you say mute!
No, That's an arcade SHMUP. You can't even get the basics right.
MW3 still isn't an arcade game is it? admit you're wrong and get off your high horse mate.
Space invaders is an arcade shooter, it was played in arcades and you shoot... genius... use ya head before you type, or even better don't type at all since all that shows up is utter garbage.
Not really, on a basic level they're both "you're a guy who has gun and must shoot AIs" but when you delve deeper they ARE different on the surface- what with Modern Warfare 3's obviously superior graphics compared to Space Invaders, different pixel globs to shoot AIs with, among other things. But if you take all that stuff away they are pretty much the same game.He meant that Modern Warfare 3 is simple and easy to pick and play like an arcade shooter such as Space Invaders..MW3 is your classic Arcade shooter, but recently has gone in a Sci-fi terminator-ish apocolypse plot, and Battlefield is your generi modern war.
Lol what? it's a military FPS, not a classic arcade shooter.
You're a lost soul if you think MW3 is a classic arcade shooter. This alone renders ANYTHING you say mute!
No, That's an arcade SHMUP. You can't even get the basics right.
MW3 still isn't an arcade game is it? admit you're wrong and get off your high horse mate.
Space invaders is an arcade shooter, it was played in arcades and you shoot... genius... use ya head before you type, or even better don't type at all since all that shows up is utter garbage.
doesn't make him any less wrong, the style is completely different.
doesn't make him any less wrong, the style is completely different.
Pretty much. I don't see why modern war FPS's get so much flack, if only casuals play them then what's the point of complaining about them ? it's just like the plebs that like Justin Bieber and Kesha and Katy Perry, if only plebs like that crap it's not keeping artists with actual talent from making money..doesn't make him any less wrong, the style is completely different.
Actually it doesn't. I guess you've never heard the phrase "Themepark MMO" before?
A lot more people more qualified than an idiot who uses a photoshop from cracked.com as a source have called it that, and I'd say they are right because they aren't absolute morons complaining about boogiemen on a forums like a manchild trying to clutch onto their NESalgia goggles.
I suppose you think you're one of those people S32 lol. you're both wrong if you think MW3 is an arcade shooter, there's nothing arcade-like about it, why don't you go ahead and call it and rpg because you play the role of a soldier lol... what a joke.I never said it was an arcade shooter I said it shared many distinct similarities to an arcade shooter as an example..
Watch it I happen to like Ke$ha & Katy Perry (But JB deserves a shotgun to the balls)Pretty much. I don't see why modern war FPS's get so much flack, if only casuals play them then what's the point of complaining about them ? it's just like the plebs that like Justin Bieber and Kesha and Katy Perry, if only plebs like that crap it's not keeping artists with actual talent from making money..doesn't make him any less wrong, the style is completely different.
Actually it doesn't. I guess you've never heard the phrase "Themepark MMO" before?
A lot more people more qualified than an idiot who uses a photoshop from cracked.com as a source have called it that, and I'd say they are right because they aren't absolute morons complaining about boogiemen on a forums like a manchild trying to clutch onto their NESalgia goggles.
Watch it I happen to like Ke$ha & Katy Perry
i doWatch it I happen to like Ke$ha & Katy Perry
And I happen to like Pirahna 3D. That doesn't make it any less sh** than it already is.
Come on man, they're computer-generated talentless divas who have to LIP-SYNC THEIR OWN CONCERTS. How is that even considered music? Remember when guitar was a strong solo or a smooth bass, and not just an accompaniment track to keep you thinking that what you're listening to actually has instruments playing? Or when, if you were asked to play a section of a song, you could pick up your guitar, or drumsticks, or crank your amp up to eleven and actually PLAY THE SECTION WITH LEGITIMATE INSTRUMENTS? No, you probably don't. I may not be old enough to have lived during that time, but damn right I can sure appreciate it.
...I gotta go take some Advil.
I suppose you think you're one of those people S32 lol. you're both wrong if you think MW3 is an arcade shooter, there's nothing arcade-like about it, why don't you go ahead and call it and rpg because you play the role of a soldier lol... what a joke.
Bieber is 100 times better than the pile of sh** that is KE$HA, jussayin'.Watch it I happen to like Ke$ha & Katy Perry (But JB deserves a shotgun to the balls)Pretty much. I don't see why modern war FPS's get so much flack, if only casuals play them then what's the point of complaining about them ? it's just like the plebs that like Justin Bieber and Kesha and Katy Perry, if only plebs like that crap it's not keeping artists with actual talent from making money..doesn't make him any less wrong, the style is completely different.
Actually it doesn't. I guess you've never heard the phrase "Themepark MMO" before?
A lot more people more qualified than an idiot who uses a photoshop from cracked.com as a source have called it that, and I'd say they are right because they aren't absolute morons complaining about boogiemen on a forums like a manchild trying to clutch onto their NESalgia goggles.