Author Topic: Whamett's Showcase!  (Read 1737 times)

Offline WhamettNuht

  • *
  • Posts: 1302
  • Rep: 12
  • Robot Building Drag Queen
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: WhamettNuht #1457
Whamett's Showcase!
« on: December 27, 2008, 02:40:12 PM »
Hi All
I decided it was time i had a showcase!
Here are some of my current robots:








If you have any comments, then feel free.
Sorry, no inside pics, but if you want to know what makes one of them work, then just ask!
See Ya
Whamett
Damn I should probably put something fancy in this bit huh?

Offline R1885

  • *
  • Posts: 2127
  • Rep: 3
  • Forum shopping list generator.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2008, 04:10:15 PM »
Whats with you and chuzzles? There all decent. The first one is my fav.

Offline WhamettNuht

  • *
  • Posts: 1302
  • Rep: 12
  • Robot Building Drag Queen
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: WhamettNuht #1457
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2008, 04:18:04 PM »
Thanks! :-D
I chose Chuzzles as a theme because:
1. Its one of my fav games (RA2 first!)
2. The motto of the game Chuzzle is "They're cute, they're cuddly, they're explosive!" which is exactly what my bots are!
3. The idea of some sweet thing on a robot, well!
Thanks, chuzzle has always been a sucess on RA2 Online! (Chuzzle and Reier's MDIVV or that have a long going grudge with each other!)
Damn I should probably put something fancy in this bit huh?

Offline Somebody

  • *
  • Posts: 7201
  • Rep: 13
  • CP: +2
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2008, 04:26:45 PM »
I think that Clockwork Chuzzle 1 is better than 2 (yes, I am the Mako in that pic)

Also, Chuzzy is scary destructive.
I built that big robot on that TV show that time


Offline somestrangeguy

  • *
  • Posts: 2068
  • Rep: 2
  • If you can read this, your monitor is turned on.
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2008, 04:39:43 PM »
Somehow I get the feeling that Chuzzle(the first one) isnt realistic, can I see insides of it?
Do the spikes go trough the wheels?

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2008, 04:40:23 PM »
Why aren't you giving us inside pics ??  

Chuzzle: Crappy wheels. Huge chassis. Not enough HP's into the weapons. Too slow for a SnS. What else?

SoaC: Well, it's not too bad, but i have the feeling it hasn't enough HPs into it's weapons.

Psycho Chuzzle III: It looks decently built, but that's just a pusher. I'll make that completely invertible if I was you.

Chuzzle Teen: That reminds me of Ripterra.

Chuzzy II: My favorite, but mainly because it's a popup. It is decently built although it needs much improvements to be really good.

Clockwork Chuzzle: Well, it does look decently built although i bet that srimech could be better. N°1 looked better IMO.

Chizzle: Why are you using two different wedge types on a flipper ? Anyways two BSG's do look pretty weak for a MW flipper.

Offline WhamettNuht

  • *
  • Posts: 1302
  • Rep: 12
  • Robot Building Drag Queen
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: WhamettNuht #1457
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2008, 02:53:26 AM »
Chuzzle's spikes are set at 90degrees, so they dont touch the wheels.
And for Nar:

Chuzzle: Well, if you thought he was bad you should have seen the bot he was made after, Sun Stroke, i used a small chassis in SS, and WAY to many hinges in one chassis, and yes, TWM3R x2 for drive! It wasnt that good, it had a slow spin up time, and the like.
BUT Chuzzle is powered by 2 NPC fasts, so when he spins up, he kicks ass!

SoaC: It isnt that good, im trying to improve it. It is acctually a remake of a FW called Chuzzle in my RA2 series i did on You Tube called Wild Robots.

Psycho Chuzzle III: It is invertible. Unlike Mangy Mutt!

Chuzzle Teen: Does it?

Chuzzy 2: I know it needs improvments, like changing the burst motors for a start! (And making it invertible!)

Clockwork Chuzzle: It could be better, but at least it self rights! (Unlike no.1)
With No.1 one flip on it and yep, immobility warning!

Chizzle: The reason for 2 different wedge types is because its my ELBITE entry!
And its quite powerfull for a MW flipper, senn there tossing a car into the air!
Damn I should probably put something fancy in this bit huh?

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23267
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2008, 04:26:40 AM »
Oh well...

Chuzzle: Most modern day HW SnS have perhaps 1,5 times more HPs in their weapons and most have more than 3x that drive train. Plus that chassis is huge. Think Pinball. (I honestly think 4 Etek drive is too much, that said, and 2 70kg's isn't enough)

SoaC: It has only something like 60kg into it's weapon. I told you: not enough hitpoints into it's weapons...

PCII: Only half invertible. You're losing half of the drive train when inverted.

Chuzzle Teen: No seriously... This has EVEN LESS HP's into his weapons than Ripterra. The high wedge only solves part of the problem.

Chuzzy: Well, if you wish to send me the bot, I'll be glad to rebuild that for you. Popups kick ass, and i do make propaganda for gut-rippers.

Also, it's not realistic.

Chizzle: Powerful? Flipjack, lightweight, is more powerful than that ! Plus, static wedges are useless if you use snapper wedges. See Smashbox 2.

Offline WhamettNuht

  • *
  • Posts: 1302
  • Rep: 12
  • Robot Building Drag Queen
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: WhamettNuht #1457
Whamett's Showcase!
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2008, 05:42:57 AM »
Ok, ok, so my robot building skills suck.
Or do they?...
I have a day all to myself today, so im going to improve my robots!
WATCH THIS SPACE!!!!!!!!!
Damn I should probably put something fancy in this bit huh?