The Bacon Bowl (DSL)

[Baconus_Yum]

And it's always the one that people don't do as often that are not accepted.

[Reier]

hammer resting support is a bit weird but i like the idea

[Badger]

Please bin that goddamn chassis. It's too wide and flat, it just looks bad.

[Baconus_Yum]

Please bin that goddamn chassis. It's too wide and flat, it just looks bad.

Badger.

I will not lay down this chassis until the Hammer is complete.

And then, and ONLY THEN, I will lay down the chassis.

It is also taller than Biohazard. saying armor plates are 2-5 cm, it is 24-30 cm tall.

[Badger]

Please bin that goddamn chassis. It's too wide and flat, it just looks bad.

Badger.

I will not lay down this chassis until the Hammer is complete.

And then, and ONLY THEN, I will lay down the chassis.

It is also taller than Biohazard. saying armor plates are 2-5 cm, it is 24-30 cm tall.

Well then it's too wide. it's just too flat, for any bot really but ESPECIALLY a hammer. Get ****ing rid of it dude, its ghastly.

[Baconus_Yum]

Please bin that goddamn chassis. It's too wide and flat, it just looks bad.

Badger.

I will not lay down this chassis until the Hammer is complete.

And then, and ONLY THEN, I will lay down the chassis.

It is also taller than Biohazard. saying armor plates are 2-5 cm, it is 24-30 cm tall.

Well then it's too wide. it's just too flat, for any bot really but ESPECIALLY a hammer. Get ****ing rid of it dude, its ghastly.

Once it deserves to be thrown out (Which by the looks of it, seems soon.)

[090901]

idk the chassis doesnt look that bad i mean i guess you could make it 30cm tall using extenders and badger wont throw another autistic sh**fit then

[Naryar]

Badger, calm down.

Flat and wide chassis is ESPECIALLY good for a hammer because it increases stability. Which is extremely important.

The chassis is fine. Granted, the random wheels on the sides aren't very good aesthetics-wise, but that's not the point.

[Badger]

Badger, calm down.

Flat and wide chassis is ESPECIALLY good for a hammer because it increases stability. Which is extremely important.

The chassis is fine. Granted, the random wheels on the sides aren't very good aesthetics-wise, but that's not the point.

It's an IRL bot. Aesthetics are LITERALLY the point.

[Baconus_Yum]

Badger, calm down.

Flat and wide chassis is ESPECIALLY good for a hammer because it increases stability. Which is extremely important.

The chassis is fine. Granted, the random wheels on the sides aren't very good aesthetics-wise, but that's not the point.

It's an IRL bot. Aesthetics are LITERALLY the point.

Badger.

I think it would please you to hear that after the hammer version is totaly complete, I am not going to add a different version.

[Meganerdbomb]

ANCAP bot?

[Baconus_Yum]

ANCAP bot?

If you mean this:

Then no.

[F1Krazy]

I think he meant anarcho-capitalism (I'll post a picture to illustrate when I get home but your bot vaguely resembles the anarcho-capitalist flag)

[Avalanche]

(Image removed from quote.)
And it's always the one that people don't do as often that are not accepted.

hoo boy where to start

it's 1:42 am so quick rundown: the axe support is slim but tall which looks flimsy and bad, plus it basically is only connected to the chassis in a single 10cm area. the back SNS doesn't make any sense: you have a robot that is entirely based on precise strikes to the front, and you make it spin on the spot where it will never hit anything with the axe? wtf why would you do that? also it looks bland and the battleaxe looks strange on the bot. the casters on the side look pointless and terrible for aesthetics. and you have an incredibly flat chassis which is the opposite of what a hammer should be. thecolours look blerg as well.

edit: also your hammer is perpendicular to the long side, meaning your piston has no room. why? redesign the chassis first and build it not as an extenderframe bot but as a regular one so you can work out a rough shape instead of an extender frame one

[Baconus_Yum]

(Image removed from quote.)
And it's always the one that people don't do as often that are not accepted.

hoo boy where to start

it's 1:42 am so quick rundown: the axe support is slim but tall which looks flimsy and bad, plus it basically is only connected to the chassis in a single 10cm area. the back SNS doesn't make any sense: you have a robot that is entirely based on precise strikes to the front, and you make it spin on the spot where it will never hit anything with the axe? wtf why would you do that? also it looks bland and the battleaxe looks strange on the bot. the casters on the side look pointless and terrible for aesthetics. and you have an incredibly flat chassis which is the opposite of what a hammer should be. thecolours look blerg as well.

edit: also your hammer is perpendicular to the long side, meaning your piston has no room. why? redesign the chassis first and build it not as an extenderframe bot but as a regular one so you can work out a rough shape instead of an extender frame one

Avalanche...

I am not being mean, but I have to point out a few things:

First: The Axe in the back. Yes, I know it is not the best looking thing, however without it, I have a LOT of extra weight. If I had something to do with the extra weight, I would sure change the Axe out. But I don't. And by something, I do not mean making the chassis taller.

Looking Bland:  it looks beautiful compared to other bots in my showcase. *cough*Pages 1-6*cough*

Casters: They are to help stabilize the bot a bit more, if you want, I will change them to those colored Casters.

Flat Chassis:

Flat and wide chassis is ESPECIALLY good for a hammer because it increases stability. Which is extremely important.

The Colors: So you hate Batman?

Hammer Location: Yeah, I could redesign that. However, I think that would be for an entirely new bot in general.

Extender Bot: To be honest, you cannot say stuff about this. You have not made a single extender bot. Well, not as in your showcase. If anybody can criticize me on extender bots, the most worthy is Badger.

[Mr. AS]

ANCAP bot?

Casters: They are to help stabilize the bot a bit more, if you want, I will change them to those colored Casters.

I'd personally change the front casters to iron spikes, and maybe shorten the extender holding the battleaxe.

[Baconus_Yum]

Righteous Judgement
248.5 KG.

[TheRoboteer]

Remove the front and rear casters and either give the axe a support or BFE it to swing 180 degrees and you'd have a very solid looking bot there.

[Badger]

Hey, thats not bad. The hammer rest looks kinda bad tho, I would delete it. And I'm still not a fan of the casters, but they give the bot some character I guess.

Overall, a very good effort.

[Baconus_Yum]

Hey, thats not bad. The hammer rest looks kinda bad tho, I would delete it. And I'm still not a fan of the casters, but they give the bot some character I guess.

Overall, a very good effort.

The Support is actually a ballast...
But I guess I could make it an actual support.
Also, I used colored casters, so the thumb is not too sore.