Author Topic: Naryar's DSL showcase - Oldschool DSL-S with 2.2 (Read 447424 times)

Naryar · « **Reply #920 on:** June 28, 2010, 09:36:05 AM »

Probable Combat Clusters entry - Combustible, 3mm titanium

That totally is not going to remind Craaig of something...

martymidget · « **Reply #921 on:** June 28, 2010, 09:43:34 AM »

Looks nice. What's it called? Burning Octane? Fiery Ethanol?;p

Naryar · « **Reply #922 on:** June 28, 2010, 09:48:01 AM »

Combustible. As said in the post :P

After failing making a weaponed flipper as companion, I now plan on making a pure flamethrower wedge bot.

martymidget · « **Reply #923 on:** June 28, 2010, 09:55:05 AM »

Woops, didn't notice that one :P

Have fun with that XD

123savethewhales · « **Reply #924 on:** June 28, 2010, 10:10:01 AM »

Lol @ the outrageously overpowered dragon breath motor. That thing shouldn't have more than 21 torque on it.

Naryar · « **Reply #925 on:** June 28, 2010, 10:14:42 AM »

Quote from: 123savethewhales on June 28, 2010, 10:10:01 AM

Lol @ the outrageously overpowered dragon breath motor.

Exactly why i am using it... and it's even more overpowered in v2.2 (what Combat Clusters is)

123savethewhales · « **Reply #926 on:** June 28, 2010, 10:19:11 AM »

I am just saying you need to drop that thing down to 21 torque on 2.4. E-Tek got 22 and weights 15kg more

Maybe I should enter that tournament with second sunrise again, except with this motor of course.

Naryar · « **Reply #927 on:** June 28, 2010, 10:23:30 AM »

It's supposed to be a drive motor as well

I should balance high torque/kg with relatively low maxspeed really...

123savethewhales · « **Reply #928 on:** June 28, 2010, 10:36:05 AM »

You will need to seriously cut the Max speed then, even 60 might be too much (have to test).

I would suggest making it a pure weapon motor, not just for the sake of balance, but because nobody will use that over NPC fast for drive.

Like the BSG/Mag Snapper comparison, or the perm 132/dual perm, max speed doesn't affect damage unless it is really low.

Naryar · « **Reply #929 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:01:51 AM »

I will see.

Anyways...

That's what I am able to build in less than 20 minutes with nearly being drunk :P It has 10mm plastic.

I tried to save maximum extender work.Now to see if it is better than the previously showcased one...

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #930 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:07:54 AM »

:0, this is invertible?

Naryar · « **Reply #931 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:09:12 AM »

Very likely is, but untested yet.

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #932 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:11:32 AM »

Then it's not like pinball.

G.K. · « **Reply #933 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:13:38 AM »

I'm not quibbling so much about it being invertible. When I look at that, I don't think 'That looks like Pinball'. If you were to turn the E-Teks around I would be fine with it.

JoeBlo · « **Reply #934 on:** June 28, 2010, 11:27:27 AM »

it should use a black disc... like the real pinball and the robot pinball was based off

Naryar · « **Reply #935 on:** June 28, 2010, 01:10:06 PM »

It fails anyway, and black disc = not good. So i'm going to use the previous one.

G.K. · « **Reply #936 on:** June 28, 2010, 01:11:14 PM »

That's fine by me.

Naryar · « **Reply #937 on:** June 28, 2010, 01:16:22 PM »

Heat Wave - 3 ants, 5mm Ti, 2 large pumas, 3 flamethrowers, NPC fasts.

Probable other CC entry, but it must first stop crashing the game when AI-ed

Also, will probably make the chassis slightly smaller and use 10mm plastic.

DG · « **Reply #938 on:** June 28, 2010, 02:40:08 PM »

How do you get your chassis so thin in the first place?

Vertigo · « **Reply #939 on:** June 28, 2010, 02:41:57 PM »

Quote from: DG on June 28, 2010, 02:40:08 PM

How do you get your chassis so thin in the first place?

By raising the bar as high as possible, then clickin on the lowest possible pixel on it