Author Topic: Naryar's DSL showcase - Oldschool DSL-S with 2.2 (Read 447429 times)

Naryar · « **Reply #660 on:** February 19, 2010, 04:21:19 PM »

Quote from: Doomkiller on February 19, 2010, 04:15:39 PM

0-0

YOU KILLED INFECTIOUS VIRUS! YOU BASTARD!

XD

I also have a screenshot of him trashing Speedy Recovery and i was going to post that pic with the others but then i thought seeing 2 of your bots getting beaten would be too much for you to handle

Doomkiller · « **Reply #661 on:** February 19, 2010, 04:41:17 PM »

you evil, evil person.

lloopp D lloopp · « **Reply #662 on:** February 20, 2010, 08:34:43 AM »

Well Nary, I think mine looks cooler.:P

Naryar · « **Reply #663 on:** February 20, 2010, 08:36:47 AM »

Quote from: lloopp D lloopp on February 20, 2010, 08:34:43 AM

Well Nary, I think mine looks cooler.:P

Mine is faster and more powerful !

Pwnator · « **Reply #664 on:** February 20, 2010, 08:37:35 AM »

Size matters. :P

Somebody · « **Reply #665 on:** February 22, 2010, 07:31:27 AM »

Thats what she said :P

Pwnator · « **Reply #666 on:** March 14, 2010, 03:32:53 AM »

*breaks 666 count lolz*

Naryar · « **Reply #667 on:** March 14, 2010, 03:40:08 AM »

*Whacks Pwn*

Anyways, the comp still sucks but i do have a few original designs being half-built. Will post them.

Naryar · « **Reply #668 on:** March 23, 2010, 08:39:20 AM »

Not exceptionally original (I don't build a lot these days because Dwarf Fortress is too awesome), but something that might be NAR AI v2.3's Coal Miner

6 ants, 5mm steel. Used 2WD for efficiency (2WD Etek + overkills = faster than 4WD NPC Fast with tornados, consumes less energy for roughly the same weight) and came back to the single FS design (also attempting to make that design good with wedges)

Now to see if it fights well or not...

Pwnator · « **Reply #669 on:** March 23, 2010, 08:41:02 AM »

Quote from: Naryar on March 23, 2010, 08:39:20 AM

Used 1WD for efficiency

O_O

Kewl itty-bitty chassis. XD

Naryar · « **Reply #670 on:** March 23, 2010, 08:46:21 AM »

I mean 2WD

LiNcK · « **Reply #671 on:** March 23, 2010, 08:51:20 AM »

Not being able to see the chassis disturbs me

Tiny chassis is tiny!

Naryar · « **Reply #672 on:** March 23, 2010, 09:12:24 AM »

That's ust 6 ants, 5 multi's and a control board... and empty space.

Anyways it does seem to be in equal terms with the old ICM, and it is average as i suspected :P

Now to replace it or not...

The Ounce · « **Reply #673 on:** March 23, 2010, 08:11:45 PM »

I honestly would prefer if you switch back to the weapon setup used on the original ICM. The top disk(s) could not only deal damage as well as trap opponents, and it looks cooler.

Condor33 · « **Reply #674 on:** March 23, 2010, 09:30:56 PM »

Use the WBC wheels. They're 3 kg lighter and more grippy.

Naryar · « **Reply #675 on:** March 24, 2010, 02:19:26 AM »

No, they are not more grippy.

Naryar · « **Reply #676 on:** March 24, 2010, 06:07:57 AM »

Managed to got rid of builders block yesterday so here's the second bot i built

Metallic Devourer, 4 ants (no really), 1mm plastic. The point was to make a drum with the weapon protecting the chassis.

Planned entry for STC's tourney but just by looking at it I bet it fails so i most likely won't enter it.

I just don't have the weight to make it good

I'll get a HW version done.

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #677 on:** March 24, 2010, 07:53:40 AM »

That's umm... Interesesting design... O.O

Squirrel_Monkey · « **Reply #678 on:** March 24, 2010, 11:34:32 AM »

I've made drum with the chassis inside also. *Heads over to showcase it*

123savethewhales · « **Reply #679 on:** March 26, 2010, 03:03:17 AM »

Does this bot really need a wedge?