Author Topic: FOTEPX's DSL Showcase (Read 273468 times)

Somebody · « **Reply #640 on:** October 07, 2010, 06:46:51 PM »

wtf is that.

FOTEPX · « **Reply #641 on:** October 07, 2010, 06:50:43 PM »

Quote from: Somebody on October 07, 2010, 06:46:51 PM

wtf is that.

It's a plane.

NFX · « **Reply #642 on:** October 07, 2010, 07:13:51 PM »

It looks like something Dr. Eggman would fight Sonic with.

Somebody · « **Reply #643 on:** October 07, 2010, 07:50:30 PM »

Does it have wheels?

Clickbeetle · « **Reply #644 on:** October 07, 2010, 11:53:38 PM »

Quote from: FOTEPX on October 07, 2010, 06:16:47 PM

Here ya go. Still 1 Battery, Still 1 ant, but still awesome.

[Flying Battery 4]

Don't the weapons touch the ground and deal no damage? I can't picture those little extenders supporting the whole weight of that weapon.

Also, needs more batteries. You can't even spin and drive at the same time with 1 ant. The obvious way to get weight for batteries is to use Copal drive... but then you risk making a Die-Cast clone.

Naryar · « **Reply #645 on:** October 08, 2010, 02:19:52 AM »

DSL bars alone are fail weapons anyway.

And 1 ant ALSO is fail.

FOTEPX · « **Reply #646 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:06:08 AM »

Quote from: Clickbeetle on October 07, 2010, 11:53:38 PM

Quote from: FOTEPX on October 07, 2010, 06:16:47 PM
Here ya go. Still 1 Battery, Still 1 ant, but still awesome.

[Flying Battery 4]

Don't the weapons touch the ground and deal no damage? I can't picture those little extenders supporting the whole weight of that weapon.

Also, needs more batteries. You can't even spin and drive at the same time with 1 ant. The obvious way to get weight for batteries is to use Copal drive... but then you risk making a Die-Cast clone.

I WILL NOT DARE VENTURE INTO THE WORLD OF THE UNREALISTIC

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #647 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:08:48 AM »

I would prefer, to put small wheels to FB4, remove the 2 Razor tips and change them into small Teeths. And try somehow to put 1 More Ant there...

Pwnator · « **Reply #648 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:13:41 AM »

Quote from: FOTEPX on October 08, 2010, 05:06:08 AM

I WILL NOT DARE VENTURE INTO THE WORLD OF THE UNREALISTIC

Yeah, right. I've seen some unrealistic designs from you, so stop contradicting yourself. :P

FOTEPX · « **Reply #649 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:26:43 AM »

Quote from: Clickbeetle on October 07, 2010, 11:53:38 PM

Don't the weapons touch the ground and deal no damage? I can't picture those little extenders supporting the whole weight of that weapon.

...yes. How did you know that? ANYWAYYYYY...

Flying Battery 5 is here! Fixed all the problems (non-invertability, low damage, havok, 1 ant, low armour) whilst still being the awesomeness we all like.

Tite 1
2 ants

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #650 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:31:24 AM »

First you said that it has 1 ant, and then you say that it has 2...

Naryar · « **Reply #651 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:35:15 AM »

Quote from: Jonzu95 on October 08, 2010, 05:31:24 AM

First you said that it has 1 ant, and then you say that it has 2...

He said he fixed the problem of 1 ant, and now it has 2.

It looks a lot like some ant i've seen previously (unsure who was the builder though)

FOTEPX · « **Reply #652 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:35:43 AM »

Quote from: Jonzu95 on October 08, 2010, 05:31:24 AM

First you said that it has 1 ant, and then you say that it has 2...

I said that having 1 ant was a PROBLEM that is USED TO have. It doesn't have it any more.

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #653 on:** October 08, 2010, 05:55:32 AM »

oh. Now I get it... Sorry.

FOTEPX · « **Reply #654 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:12:47 AM »

Oh look, I upgraded Osprey. Now it even has a working helecopter blade!

Pwnator · « **Reply #655 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:20:40 AM »

You know, it's better if you DON'T make it combat-effective at all. Those weapons kill the design.

FOTEPX · « **Reply #656 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:40:38 AM »

I think it looks cool like that.

Pwnator · « **Reply #657 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:46:09 AM »

Then you shouldn't have named it 'Osprey', as it is totally misleading. :P

Naryar · « **Reply #658 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:50:54 AM »

It's also just a mess of weapons...

Natef · « **Reply #659 on:** October 08, 2010, 07:20:59 AM »

I liked the original Osprey. You know, I've actuallly been inside one!