Author Topic: Conraaa's DSL showcase-The stuff I do on the weekends. (Read 140526 times)

Naryar · « **Reply #620 on:** July 28, 2012, 03:26:24 PM »

Is it invertible ?

Conraaa · « **Reply #621 on:** July 28, 2012, 03:29:09 PM »

It can move while inverted, not gracefully, or in the direction you want it to move, but it can move.

Urjak · « **Reply #622 on:** July 28, 2012, 03:42:05 PM »

Do you really need your chassis to stick out with the e-techs? Perhaps some sort of small extender (like a hex plate) would be better.

Conraaa · « **Reply #623 on:** July 28, 2012, 04:11:11 PM »

A small extender would work, but by the time I've protected the extender any weight advantage would probably be gone.

Naryar · « **Reply #624 on:** July 28, 2012, 04:33:18 PM »

You don't really need to protect the extender since the Eteks do.

Conraaa · « **Reply #625 on:** July 28, 2012, 04:36:35 PM »

I'll rebuild it tommorow, when i'm not only running off of energy drinks.

Conraaa · « **Reply #626 on:** July 29, 2012, 03:22:08 PM »

I was rebuilding it, only to go "Sod this" and turn it into a flipper. I also fought of a theme for my SOTF team as an added bonus.

Conraaa · « **Reply #627 on:** July 29, 2012, 04:04:52 PM »

Dp: I knew you guys would like it! Here, have an update!

Downgraded to NPC normals and got up to Alu10 to use excess weight.
And just look at that agod! hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggg

090901 · « **Reply #628 on:** July 29, 2012, 08:09:18 PM »

Dat agod.

Naryar · « **Reply #629 on:** July 30, 2012, 05:05:27 AM »

At least it's original.

madman3 · « **Reply #630 on:** July 30, 2012, 02:20:41 PM »

Export that sucker into a new team spot and the AGOD may disappear.
Looks good though.

Conraaa · « **Reply #631 on:** August 06, 2012, 02:00:00 PM »

Hello, remain indoors and welcome!

Prototype for cruisin' for a bruisin'. Untested as there aren't that many cruiserweights kicking around. And I can't be bothered to trawl the bot exchange for underweight HW's.

Also that should read 595.8kg, my mistake.

martymidget · « **Reply #632 on:** August 06, 2012, 02:16:32 PM »

Lookin' good. Scares my only existing CW (prototype from when JB annoucned CCV might be CW o.o) a great deal. I need to build a decent one, and soon. :L

Are those skirts steel or al? If al, I think you could upgrade them to tite and still be in the limit.

NFX · « **Reply #633 on:** August 06, 2012, 02:23:09 PM »

Looks pretty good. Only CW I've got is one half of Swarm from WotG. I reckon, though, if you can take apart most of the HW's, you should be more or less alright.

Conraaa · « **Reply #634 on:** August 06, 2012, 02:31:24 PM »

Quote from: martymidget on August 06, 2012, 02:16:32 PM

Lookin' good. Scares my only existing CW (prototype from when JB annoucned CCV might be CW o.o) a great deal. I need to build a decent one, and soon. :L

Are those skirts steel or al? If al, I think you could upgrade them to tite and still be in the limit.

Alu 80cm angled. I'll see if I can upgrade them.

NFX · « **Reply #635 on:** August 06, 2012, 02:40:38 PM »

Quote from: Conraaa on August 06, 2012, 02:31:24 PM

Quote from: martymidget on August 06, 2012, 02:16:32 PM
Lookin' good. Scares my only existing CW (prototype from when JB annoucned CCV might be CW o.o) a great deal. I need to build a decent one, and soon. :L

Are those skirts steel or al? If al, I think you could upgrade them to tite and still be in the limit.
Alu 80cm angled. I'll see if I can upgrade them.

Depends on whether or not they make the wedges worse. There wouldn't be much point in having slightly stronger wedges if they can't get under anything.

Mr. AS · « **Reply #636 on:** August 06, 2012, 03:04:35 PM »

i was a bit worried when i saw 575 kg and was about to scream MOAR RAZORS!!!!!1!11 but i saw that it was actually 595

wonder how fast 4npcf + hypno is on what is bascially a 200 kg hw..... id assume it would be pretty agile

Conraaa · « **Reply #637 on:** August 06, 2012, 03:57:59 PM »

~~No one got the Mitcheck and Webb reference?~~
Yeah it's fairly nippy, in the test garage at least.

smashysmashy · « **Reply #638 on:** August 06, 2012, 04:03:45 PM »

Quote from: Conraaa on August 06, 2012, 03:57:59 PM

No one got the Mitcheck and Webb reference?

Sorry, more of an Armstrong and Miller watcher.

MassimoV · « **Reply #639 on:** August 06, 2012, 05:41:05 PM »

Quote from: Conraaa on August 06, 2012, 03:57:59 PM

No one got the Mitcheck and Webb reference?

If you named it Number Wang might have.