Author Topic: Building Styles - A Discussion  (Read 3892 times)

Offline Naryar

  • Posts: 23278
  • Rep: 20
  • hybrids oui oui
    • http://www.youtube.com/us
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Skype: TheMightyNaryar
Re: Building Styles - A Discussion
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2014, 10:14:10 AM »
i am feeling that irl will forever be a matter of opinion cause unlike DSL-S there are 3 different sides for the simple question "what is irl"

or we could agree on an official IRL definition. but that would be like the crawler debate all over again.

Offline Thyrus

  • *
  • Posts: 6218
  • Rep: 19
  • Back to purple '17
    • http://www.youtube.com/Th
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Building Styles - A Discussion
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2014, 10:24:49 AM »
i am feeling that irl will forever be a matter of opinion cause unlike DSL-S there are 3 different sides for the simple question "what is irl"

or we could agree on an official IRL definition. but that would be like the crawler debate all over again.

that`s true. "IRL" is quite hard to define since there are no rules for it. I don`t think you can get people to agree with a ruleset for it. wedges and crawlers are a good example for controverse decssion

Offline cephalopod

Re: Building Styles - A Discussion
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2014, 11:03:25 AM »
Well perhaps at least the definitions of the other 2 need to be more clear - for example El Chickenado thought DSL-S was Unrealistic. Things were easier when DSL-S was 'DSL Realistic Rule' :')
bristol bot builders / two headed death flamingo / snappy robots
//
kindest and friendliest '13, '15, '16, '17 / favourite staff member '14, '15