The 100 Most Memorable RA2 Robots Of All Time

[Mr. AS]

Why is Toriodore on there?

why are ANY irl robots on there for that matter?

[Badnik96]

Yeah IDK why I put Toriodore there

It's not on the final list

[Kossokei]

Why is Toriodore on there?

why are ANY irl robots on there for that matter?

the International Reich of Legitimacy shall prevail over the heretics.

[G.K.]

Would personally lose the Wild Robots & IRL bots, as well as AntonYYYm, Caesium and Final Z. Possibly IWGS, Insectoid and Ion, though I'd be happy to see them stay. Destroyer's reasoning is wrong but I think it should still be there.

I don't know The Infinite, Second Sunrise, Lame HS, Radical Disturbance.

Perhaps put in Little Cube, 2-Sinister and COID?

[Badnik96]

Caesium and the WR/AON bots are gone. So is Radial Disturbance IIRC.

[Venko]

...I can kill every single bot that is on the list...

*cough*The Infinite*cough*

@ G.K. : "The Infinte" series is a legend in the stock UHW building/stacking since 2008, here is the BOTM April 2013 winner as a representative of what "The Infinte" is, plus (the 2nd and 3rd pics) the first one :

[123savethewhales]

Well you are right about that, I don't intend to build something that size in stock.

Although hex mode does exist nowadays, so building something larger should be possible.

[Venko]

Did anyone still have the pic of the ORIGINAL stock bot, that could actually glitch it's razors inside the opponent's chassis, doing trillions of damage (originaly built by Artitan/Pete Lefeu, it was called Sting, and the sequel was called Devil Incarnation).
I want to crack and adapt this glitch to my stock bots 

[090901]

Did anyone still have the pic of the ORIGINAL stock bot, that could actually glitch it's razors inside the opponent's chassis, doing trillions of damage (originaly built by Artitan/Pete Lefeu, it was called Sting, and the sequel was called Devil Incarnation).
I want to crack and adapt this glitch to my stock bots 

Like I said earlier, I'm pretty sure someone said it was fake a long time ago and it was just razors edited to have a sh** ton of damage

[Venko]

First, we are not 100% sure, that this is true, just cos some guy said it, maybe he is trying to hide that black magic...
And second, I'm going to try it anyway 
Who knows, I discovered the "VENKO'S UBER WEDGES" accidently too.

[123savethewhales]

Glitching stuff inside something else actually happens occasionally in DSL due to the amount of flail spams.  While it would cause some havok, it won't actually result in super damage.  They will just spin around, dealing minor damage in the teens in a slow fixed interval.

You are of course free to experiment with the physics of course, since you never know what you might find.

[Venko]

You are of course free to experiment with the physics of course, since you never know what you might find.

^ QFT. IMO, in RA2 it repays to be a crazy experimentator.

[Naryar]

Did anyone still have the pic of the ORIGINAL stock bot, that could actually glitch it's razors inside the opponent's chassis, doing trillions of damage (originaly built by Artitan/Pete Lefeu, it was called Sting, and the sequel was called Devil Incarnation).
I want to crack and adapt this glitch to my stock bots 

i'm pretty sure it'll get banned and breaks the controlled movement rule.

[Venko]

i'm pretty sure it'll get banned and breaks the controlled movement rule.

How it breaks it? How the CN breaks it too? It's not like I'm trying to enter with a crawler or something... Instead of banning the uber ghey cheaty 140 squares and the uberstack, the people are banning my innovations (Cheap Norris - already banned, Venko's magic uber wedges - ban proposed by Maz, possible future uber damage - ban proposed by Nar, or whatever), made to replace the eons old boring clasic bot types. If my bots are "that" much scary, people just can ban me from entering anywhere - problem solved. The banning of every bot I built lately (even if it fits in the rules on paper) is kinda insultive, not right and it hurts for the builder. All, keep that politics, and let's see what will happen.

[AlexGRFan97]

I personally think Venko's inventions should be embraced rather than being sanctioned right away. If you want to beat him, come up with something new or enter a similar robot and fight fire with fire. Seriously, Stock is not going to move anywhere and will stagnate/die if the latest innovations continue to be simply banned up front. There is no Realistic Rule in Stock so there shouldn't be a need to ban certain building styles unless the person responsible is actually cheating (Cheatbot2). Manipulating the game's physics to your advantage is skill, not cheating.

[Mr. AS]

i'm pretty sure it'll get banned and breaks the controlled movement rule.

How it breaks it? How the CN breaks it too? It's not like I'm trying to enter with a crawler or something... Instead of banning the uber ghey cheaty 140 squares and the uberstack, the people are banning my innovations (Cheap Norris - already banned, Venko's magic uber wedges - ban proposed by Maz, possible future uber damage - ban proposed by Nar, or whatever), made to replace the eons old boring clasic bot types. If my bots are "that" much scary, people just can ban me from entering anywhere - problem solved. The banning of every bot I built lately (even if it fits in the rules on paper) is kinda insultive, not right and it hurts for the builder. All, keep that politics, and let's see what will happen.

i dont think it helped that you named it "cheap norris"

[Venko]

i dont think it helped that you named it "cheap norris"

Probably, but why a name of a bot even matters here? I named the bot like this, cos it was using the "cheap" 140s, which I hate. It's basically like this : ClickB makes "Hide and Seek" multibot for "Clash of the titans" - "clever use of game mechanics" and clever ClikcB; Venko makes a legal VS/HS hybrid with 2WD, with a powered drive motors, nothing touches the ground initially or without breaking the extenders - "UBER CHEATY BOT ALARM" started by some users, that don't like me. Is this fair? If it's someone else - OK, if it's Venko - problems, problems, problems... Also, remember, cheap =/= illegal. And one question to everyone : what if I built CN with some extender protection, where is the borderline between the "legal" VS/legged bot and CN? How much weight to spend for an extender protection? Why Insect is legal, cos of 4 swords? What if I remove some chassis protection and add 4 sowrds to CN? Will it be "legal" then? CN is imposible to build without the 140s (Trov saw the useless no-140s version), this was my punishment to 090901 for allowing the 140s, that was in my mind when I said, that "I entered as a part of my anti-140s tactic". When I see, that the 140s are allowed somewhere, I enter with a bot, that it's imposible without them, so if I win, I can say : If you wouldn't allowed them, this would never happen :) Although, I didn't won with CN, it's not that much of advantage or immortal.

Now, I will quit spamming this thread.

[Naryar]

Fight or Flight must be in this. It IS the most known clamp and the most copied clamp as well.

also has a badass name.

[markman798]

This isnt a suggestion, but did anyone think ripblade for countless havok explosions?

[playzooki]

Hide and Seek was memorable purely for it clever and funny tactics