gametechmods

Robot Arena => Discussion => Topic started by: GoldenFox93 on October 23, 2009, 10:17:41 AM

Title: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: GoldenFox93 on October 23, 2009, 10:17:41 AM
Seeing as I'm bored, I thought I'd ask this:
Which Replicas in DSL do you think need improvements?

Personally, I know Razer, Nightmare, Minion, HypnoDisc and Typhoon 2 are going to be reworked, so I'm going to mention two from 2.1, here.

Chaos 2
Personally, this one looks near-perfect, but has the wrong burst motor installed (Lifter?), and is too slow. I can fix the burst motor, but not the drive motors without messing up the Exoskeleton. It might be nice if it had a more powerful, "Flippier" burst motor, and if it was faster and slightly wider.

Firestorm IV
This one could really use a remake. Its back is rounded, whereas in real life, its back is raised, with large wheels visible . It also has a terrible wedge, with no capability for getting under robots. The burst motor, which I suspect may have been meant for Chaos 2, causes it to glitch almost every time it's fired. I mean, to be honest, the Firestorm in the Alphasim RW AI pack was better than the one in DSL. If they used a refined version of that, I reckon that Firestorm would perform much better.
Title: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Clickbeetle on October 23, 2009, 10:18:25 PM
Those are on the to-do list, along with 90% of the other replicas too...
Title: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: TriTon on October 23, 2009, 11:05:59 PM
How about The Judge, his snapper goes into havok when it fires.
Title: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Badnik96 on October 24, 2009, 08:03:13 AM
when WBC flips and the flipper resets on a bot, WBC havoks.
Title: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: GoldenFox93 on October 24, 2009, 09:32:51 AM
Quote from: Clickbeetle;74605
Those are on the to-do list, along with 90% of the other replicas too...


OK, thanks Click.

Also, if it's possible, would a Cassius II replica somewhere be possible?  =  P
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Stagfish on December 30, 2009, 09:31:52 AM
guys stop requesting mor replicas click has enough to do already

BUMP
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: G.K. on December 30, 2009, 09:34:05 AM
They have stopped. This was two months ago.
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Reier on December 30, 2009, 11:45:32 AM
I'm 90% sure he doesn't know where the date is.
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Stagfish on December 30, 2009, 02:55:21 PM
yup just above the text
i like bringing threads back to life
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Badnik96 on December 30, 2009, 05:10:38 PM
you mean, bumping them. Personally, if Click made a reskinned version of his new round treads, he could use them to make a better El Diablo.
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: Pwnator on December 30, 2009, 10:03:05 PM
i like bringing threads back to life

Problem is, a lot of us don't. :P
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: TriTon on December 31, 2009, 12:53:44 AM
yup just above the text
i like bringing threads back to life

Continously bumping threads will give you a bad rep.
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: JoeBlo on December 31, 2009, 01:15:48 AM
on topic bumps are ok
 
useless ones such as this are just plain annoying for everyone
 
bumping refers to the thread being bumped to the top of the list, its annoying as we get a mix of old threads with new stuff, having it all in correct time order is much better
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: TriTon on December 31, 2009, 01:18:50 AM
It annoys me cause Stag does it the most.
Title: Re: DSL Reps! Which ones do you think need a reworking?
Post by: JoeBlo on December 31, 2009, 01:30:27 AM
posting in this topic serves no further purpose. lets all just leave it be now  :mrgreen: