Why you gotta do this to us ACAMS
- excluding the 140cm square extender
Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
/!\ END 140CM SQUARE EXTENDER DISCRIMINATION TODAY /!\
That it surely does not.Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
/!\ END 140CM SQUARE EXTENDER DISCRIMINATION TODAY /!\
Yes, but the SnapperII sucks.
That it surely does not.Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
/!\ END 140CM SQUARE EXTENDER DISCRIMINATION TODAY /!\
Yes, but the SnapperII sucks.
Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
Because it is unbalanced and ghey. =P Although c3:++ used it pretty well, I thought.We accepted the SnapperII with loving arms...
Actually no. For the first couple years that I was on the official Atari forums, the Snapper II was considered a cheat part. Even Emergency wedges and other AI parts were considered cheating back in the day.
I don't know how exactly, but over time the Snapper II became gradually more accepted until it became standard on just about everything.
I expect the acceptance of the 140cm square extender will also be a gradual process.
But the SnapperII was never used for its original intention. It was supposed to be a burst motor, but people instead used it to create super-compact Snapper-loaded designs. The 140cm extender might be broken because of its weight, but you pay the price in terms of fragility. It's such a big target, and one decent hit will easily take it off.Actually the SnapperII wasn't being used for stacking purposes until way after it was accepted. I have a feeling that if it had been, it wouldn't have been accepted. One "decent" hit is also much harder to do on a well-built bot than you are giving it credit for. Humans and AI have a hard time aiming for something that thin and it would never be used for widening except when making trappers (which would be screwed either way if you managed to get on its side). As far as random chance goes, most builders could find a use for the weight loss to reduce the chance of receiving significant damage. It also would usually take more than one hit to the extender for it to break off (since it is impossible to break something off with only one weapon hitting it (it requires at least two weapons or two hits from a single weapon)). Also to take it one step further, here is some data that I took for HWs in multiple packs:
Pack: AverageDamge | MaxDamage | Damage>=100
BBEANS AI: 59.3 | 669.4 | 17.6%
ReStocked V0.1b: 45.8 | 478.5 | 9.9%
Pys AI: 52.5 | 597.3 | 13.2%
Starcore V4a: 53.6 | 680.0 | 14.7%
Comprehensive: 54.1 | 680.0 | 14.7%
AI vs AI with no bot participating more than twice.
Excludes the trinity bot (Starcore V4a would have gotten 53.9 | 1554.4 | 14.8% and the Comprehensive would have gotten 54.2 | 1554.4 | 14.7%).
Doesn't include anything less than 10.
The test was conducted by telling the game to save all damages to a text file. By having the game do it, I got 100% accurate results and stacked weapons would be grouped together whenever they hit at once.
So just to be clear, only about 3 of every 20 attacks ever exceed 100. This means that most 100HP with 15 fracture components take 3 hits to break off. Decent no, lucky yes.If people want to continue discussing this, please do it here (https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php/topic,4223.135.html) because we are drifting off topic.Right, I was just thinking it would be okay here or in the BOTM Discussion thread since the 140cm extender is allowed everywhere else.
I was busy.......
This pic took, the last one to clean, but the one I took of all the remains of the other fish I had just cleaned under that one didn't take for some reason and I have already cleaned up the mess.
(https://gametechmods.com/Pics/catfish001.JPG)
Did you go noodling for it?
Fish before forum.
Good catch, though. Though I know literally nothing about fishing. Truck could use a clean, though.
Fish before forum.
Good catch, though. Though I know literally nothing about fishing. Truck could use a clean, though.
i caught a approx 5 inch trout today
He is scottish
yeshi caught a approx 5 inch trout today
Brown trout? :laughing