Author Topic: The Meaning of Life (Read 7647 times)

Hydro · « **Reply #60 on:** May 03, 2009, 09:32:13 PM »

oh, shush.

frezal · « **Reply #61 on:** May 03, 2009, 09:43:47 PM »

Quote from: Hydro;36816

oh, shush.

Living an irrational and ignorant life is no good, and it hurts the species.

EDIT: By the way, even the Catholic church recognizes that evolution is a scientific fact.

Hydro · « **Reply #62 on:** May 03, 2009, 09:45:22 PM »

yes... arguing with Inf IS irrational...

Urjak · « **Reply #63 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:05:02 PM »

You know Jeffery, you debate really well. :)

I believe evolution is pretty much a fact. We really can't successfuly deny that evolution takes place, as we have see livings things mutate and change to better suit their environment. An obvious example is bacteria, which evolve to become resistant to antibiotics. And we can see that over billions of years from fossil reocrds, life a has changed over time.

Hydro · « **Reply #64 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:06:41 PM »

that's called adapting. the special forces do it all the time.

and i dont like catholics.

Urjak · « **Reply #65 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:12:15 PM »

I don't see how adapting is that much different from micro-evolution.

Hydro · « **Reply #66 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:13:19 PM »

i like the name better :-D

Urjak · « **Reply #67 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:15:07 PM »

I see.

Hydro · « **Reply #68 on:** May 03, 2009, 10:16:04 PM »

yes...

frezal · « **Reply #69 on:** May 03, 2009, 11:04:16 PM »

Quote from: Urjak;36826

You know Jeffery, you debate really well. :)

And I only did a year of college debate (and got $600 in scholarships to do it).

Sage · « **Reply #70 on:** May 03, 2009, 11:10:25 PM »

I did a year of high school debate! We should debate sometime Jeffery!

Hydro · « **Reply #71 on:** May 03, 2009, 11:19:46 PM »

yeah. that would be interesting... :-D

frezal · « **Reply #72 on:** May 03, 2009, 11:48:01 PM »

Quote from: Sage;36849

I did a year of high school debate! We should debate sometime Jeffery!

I once made somebody defend NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association).

R0B0SH4RK · « **Reply #73 on:** May 03, 2009, 11:58:09 PM »

Wow... for a while there, was there actually an intellectual discussion going on at GTM's?

Naryar · « **Reply #74 on:** May 04, 2009, 12:10:06 AM »

Viruses do not technically have the signs of a lifeform by themselves (eating, reproducing, etc), but indirectly (they use living things, eg cells to multiply). So i really don't know about this.

Pwnator · « **Reply #75 on:** May 04, 2009, 12:36:24 AM »

Well it depends on how specific your definition of life goes.

In my opinion, something has life if it exists with cells and can metabolize. So in that case, viruses are in the category of what I believe is 'non-cellular life.'

moonbear · « **Reply #76 on:** May 04, 2009, 03:52:52 AM »

I on the other hand happen to know a good deal about biology, and if anyone would like to debate "pro evolution" I'd be glad to help out. All of my arguments have scientific basis. night.

System32 · « **Reply #77 on:** May 04, 2009, 03:53:06 AM »

Quote from: Naryar;36868

Viruses do not technically have the signs of a lifeform by themselves (eating, reproducing, etc), but indirectly (they use living things, eg cells to multiply). So i really don't know about this.

Don't parasitic wasps do the same?

cephalopod · « **Reply #78 on:** May 04, 2009, 04:16:37 AM »

Wow. Now this was interesting to read on a dull May-Day morning.

Hydro · « **Reply #79 on:** May 04, 2009, 06:54:20 AM »

quit spamming :-D