he was never assassinated and has been working as a gas station attendant in Lawton, Oklahoma.ORLY? I only live like a mile away from Lawton, so I guess I should check.
look harder, the proof is there.
he was never assassinated and has been working as a gas station attendant in Lawton, Oklahoma.
look harder, the proof is there.
he was never assassinated and has been working as a gas station attendant in Lawton, Oklahoma.Lies. He's been living in an old folks home in East Texas.
look harder, the proof is there.
his head won't go back if he's shot from the back.
A bullet's momentum is not enough to send his head forward.
Mythbusters also disproved it, albeit on a larger scale. That extreme throwback action from the opponents you see from the movies when they're hit by buckshot or .357 rounds - they're fake. Even a deer slug can't make them budge.
if you can't get thrown off by the recoil, the person shot won't get thrown back.Long story short :P
think about it, his head won't go back if he's shot from the back.Wrong. As the bullet exits the head, it sprays the brains and junk out creating a rocket-like effect. Thus, the head goes backwards. For a more entertaining explanation:
i'll miss not knowing him though.
I think there were two shooters, but Oswald fired all the shots heard on the day. I also belive it was a conspiracy.Why?
I subscribe to the Red Dwarf theory, thatshot JFK
After a lot of resarch, which I'd rather not detail atm. Maybe later.I'd be willing to wager that most of your research consisted of half truths, omitted facts, speculation, and outright fabrications (especially if your research was primarily from web sources).
I think it was two snipers, because of the way his head splattered. It blew out from the right side, and if it was Oswald it would have been ether front, back or left side.(http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head1x.jpg)
looks to me to be the rightmost top of his headDid you know that human heads are capable of movement? Give it a try!
I say Snipers + Convertibles = Why we can't have nice things.excuse me but **** off if you don't have anything constructive to say. Kennedy's murder wasn't funny.
That is all.
I say Snipers + Convertibles = Why we can't have nice things.excuse me but **** off if you don't have anything constructive to say. Kennedy's murder wasn't funny.
That is all.
i'm just goin by the zapruder film and the bell film.They both show his head looking forward and the bullet entering the right/topPerspective and trajectory angle.
And advanced kinetics if you really want to know what you're talking about.
His seat wasn't elevated, it was lowered. It was a jump seat. The video I posted explains that in perfect detail. Once again I am basing my opinions on the bell film and the Zap-ruder film.
Maybe Oswald shot from the Building, ran the hell out of there, and shot from the knoll with another gun?
His seat wasn't elevated, it was lowered. It was a jump seat. The video I posted explains that in perfect detail. Once again I am basing my opinions on the bell film and the Zap-ruder film.Wrong.
Maybe Oswald shot from the Building, ran the hell out of there, and shot from the knoll with another gun?****ING IDIOT! No bullets that landed in President Kennedy could have been fired from the grassy knoll without defying everything that we know about ballistics. The ****ing trajectory of the ****ing bullet could have only been fired from the ****ing book depository. Had he been shot from the grassy knoll, the angle of impact would be different and the brains would have spewed out elsewhere. You said you understood this before when I explained the brain-matter propulsion. Did you forget, or did you watch more goddamn retarded videos on YouTube claiming to be presenting nothing but the facts?
Because telling an overreactive kid that he is a ****ing idiot sure will help in winning arguments...It's a ****ing forum, not a formal debate. In conclusion, **** off.