gametechmods

Off-Topic => Chatterbox => Topic started by: Stagfish on January 14, 2010, 01:41:18 PM

Title: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Stagfish on January 14, 2010, 01:41:18 PM
below sparkeys username it says limited instead of middle weight or heavy weight or what ever he was
 
lotsa grammar lessons folks!
Title: Re: Limeted?
Post by: Reier on January 14, 2010, 01:46:21 PM
That's nice.
Title: Re: Limeted?
Post by: Stagfish on January 14, 2010, 02:05:07 PM
huh?
Title: Re: Limeted?
Post by: Reier on January 14, 2010, 02:09:01 PM
BTW it's Limited, not Limeted.
Title: Re: Limeted?
Post by: G.K. on January 14, 2010, 02:17:08 PM
Hehe, limeted. Sounds like a drink gone wrong.
Title: Re: Limeted?
Post by: lloopp D lloopp on January 14, 2010, 02:17:39 PM
Does that mean he can only go to a certain rank?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 03:07:10 PM
no, I got in trouble and I have a temporary post limit
 
ACAMS, if you're reading this, I will behave now, and I have been reading other tips and stuff alot more now :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Jonzu95 on January 14, 2010, 03:11:25 PM
In your dreams... You are like LRA2, noob who doesnt read rules or tips...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 03:14:30 PM
what do you mean "in you're dreams?" I read them now, and you have to relize I just got the game so it's not lke I can incorpoate every tip into every bot
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: somestrangeguy on January 14, 2010, 03:15:56 PM
You know Sparkey, only reading isnt enough, you need to do as the instructions tell you. Just remember, you dont mess with ACAMS. You do not want to see him get angry.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 03:33:01 PM
I know, I do as the say best I can
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 14, 2010, 04:47:51 PM
Am I the only one tempted into making him go past his limit?

Well I hope you'll learn from this.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 14, 2010, 04:56:36 PM
what do you mean "in you're dreams?" I read them now, and you have to relize I just got the game so it's not lke I can incorpoate every tip into every bot
It says, "your dreams," not, "you're dreams." You're is a contraction for you are; your is the possessive form of you. (By that, I mean it shows that something belongs to you.) You can have that grammar lesson for free.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 14, 2010, 05:07:43 PM
WOW jeff, that's awesome. I only learned that in 1st grade.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 05:08:49 PM
Dude, every one makes mistakes
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 14, 2010, 05:10:03 PM
I got no problem with it, though I do like good grammar.
frezeal has a problem with everything, don't pay attention.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 05:10:45 PM
well, I do have good grammer, just sometimes I type to fast
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 14, 2010, 05:11:29 PM
Ehh...it's Grammar... ><
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 05:14:04 PM
D*mn
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: ACAMS on January 14, 2010, 06:06:22 PM
Ehh...it's Grammar... ><

And too... ><
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 06:08:09 PM
Ehh...it's Grammar... ><

And too... ><
no THAT was just imbarising lol
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Scrap Daddy on January 14, 2010, 06:11:47 PM
Ehh...it's Grammar... ><
And too... ><
no THAT was just imbarising lol
now embarrassing
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 06:15:24 PM
kill me.....
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 14, 2010, 06:47:45 PM
WOW jeff, that's awesome. I only learned that in 1st grade.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that only posts relevant to you are acceptable on GameTechMods. What else did you learn in first grade? I don't want to make the mistake of providing others with information that you already know.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 14, 2010, 06:52:12 PM
WOW jeff, that's awesome. I only learned that in 1st grade.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that only posts relevant to you are acceptable on GameTechMods. What else did you learn in first grade? I don't want to make the mistake of providing others with information that you already know.
what's you're prob? do you have any sence of humor?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 14, 2010, 06:56:26 PM
what's you're prob? do you have any sence of humor?
Oddly enough, I only find comical things to be funny. By the way, I think you should revisit my grammar lesson.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: 090901 on January 14, 2010, 07:45:22 PM
WOW jeff, that's awesome. I only learned that in 1st grade.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that only posts relevant to you are acceptable on GameTechMods. What else did you learn in first grade? I don't want to make the mistake of providing others with information that you already know.
what's you're prob? do you have any sence of humor?
"What's you are problem" That makes no sense
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: R0B0SH4RK on January 14, 2010, 11:59:49 PM
I got no problem with it, though I do like good grammar.
frezeal has a problem with everything, don't pay attention.

FDSSDDFGDFGDSGZDFAAAL >:O
 
Frezal's funny. You guys should appreciate his perma-trolling more. He's only been the master of the off-topic for longer than most of us have been around for.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 12:12:59 AM
I got no problem with it, though I do like good grammar.
frezeal has a problem with everything, don't pay attention.

FDSSDDFGDFGDSGZDFAAAL >:O
 
Frezal's funny. You guys should appreciate his perma-trolling more. He's only been the master of the off-topic for longer than most of us have been around for.
Hooray! Somebody gets it! I'm really only fulfilling this role because nobody else seems to be doing it. My posting style on, say, The Electric Playground (http://bb.elecplay.com), is much different.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Condor33 on January 15, 2010, 09:37:24 AM
Flamewar in 5... 4... 3... 2...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 15, 2010, 09:52:38 AM
Hooray! Somebody gets it! I'm really only fulfilling this role because nobody else seems to be doing it. My posting style on, say, The Electric Playground (http://bb.elecplay.com/), is much different.
I always thought you were a lazy philosopher. :P
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 15, 2010, 12:10:13 PM
Flamewar in 5... 4... 3... 2...
...1...0.75...0.5... - I'm outta here. I don't wanna be in an argument with Mr. Big Shot. I'm tired of arguments over stupid things, though apparently Jeff isn't.
 
Last post in this thread.
*Leaves*
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 01:09:17 PM
...1...0.75...0.5... - I'm outta here. I don't wanna be in an argument with Mr. Big Shot. I'm tired of arguments over stupid things, though apparently Jeff isn't.
 
Last post in this thread.
*Leaves*

Tip #457: If you want to avoid arguments, don't start sh**!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 15, 2010, 01:35:59 PM
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STRTED IT!
come on Reier, lets stop wasting our time...
*leaves thread*
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 02:14:28 PM
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STRTED IT!
come on Reier, lets stop wasting our time...
*leaves thread*
Reier attacked me (twice) when I gave you a lesson on grammar. If providing a snarky response somehow means I started any sort of scuffle in this thread, then I'm afraid I'm guilty as charged.


Here's another grammar lesson: You used the wrong lets. The one you're looking for is let's. (Let's is a contraction for let us.) I will now provide you with two example sentences showing proper usage of each word. Ex. 1: Ash lets his Pikachu roam freely without a Pokeball or a leash. Ex. 2: Let's go report Ash to the cops for disobeying leash laws.

That lesson was also free.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Zog on January 15, 2010, 05:01:17 PM
I'm here with the popcorn. Let's watch the fireworks of the flame war  :bigsmile:
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 15, 2010, 05:03:37 PM
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STRTED IT!
come on Reier, lets stop wasting our time...
*leaves thread*
Reier attacked me (twice) when I gave you a lesson on grammar. If providing a snarky response somehow means I started any sort of scuffle in this thread, then I'm afraid I'm guilty as charged.


Here's another grammar lesson: You used the wrong lets. The one you're looking for is let's. (Let's is a contraction for let us.) I will now provide you with two example sentences showing proper usage of each word. Ex. 1: Ash lets his Pikachu roam freely without a Pokeball or a leash. Ex. 2: Let's go report Ash to the cops for disobeying leash laws.

That lesson was also free.
STOP BEING A KNOW IT ALL!!!!!!
REIR WAS JOKING!!!!!
FOR GODS SAKE!!!!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sage on January 15, 2010, 05:14:22 PM
Guys, in no way is this a flame war. A grammar correction is a flame war? No, I don't think so. But popcorn is good, because comedy is always fun to watch.

By the way, what's so wrong with being a know it all? Does it make you feel stupid? Do you believe he is being condescending? You say it like it's an insult.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Urjak on January 15, 2010, 05:23:33 PM
All I can say is that Frezal knows how to make a thread interesting!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: ACAMS on January 15, 2010, 06:01:48 PM
Don't ever argue with me unless you want to be wrong!
I will never agree with you, because there is no sense in both of us being wrong!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 15, 2010, 06:38:40 PM
Don't ever argue with me unless you want to be wrong!
I will never agree with you, because there is no sense in both of us being wrong!

And you are a Texan.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 06:41:31 PM
STOP BEING A KNOW IT ALL!!!!!!
REIR WAS JOKING!!!!!
FOR GODS SAKE!!!!
Now it's time for a quick lesson on apostrophe usage. Apostrophes are used to show possession (ownership) or to take the place of one or more letters/numbers. I will now provide you with two sample sentences showing each of the proper uses of apostrophes. Sample A: Reier was joking, for God's sake! Sample B: Way back in the '80s, Ronald Reagan couldn't get enough babies to consume.


There's no cover charge for that one, but I will gladly direct you to a charity that could use your $10. http://www.redcross.org/en/donatemoney (http://www.redcross.org/en/donatemoney)
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Madiaba on January 15, 2010, 07:43:37 PM
Sparkey, you really need to use your own mental faculties, i.e. think for yourself; instead of letting everyone else think for you and then just tell you what to do...
Many here have offered to help you out, but you don't listen and think things through, and you therefore post nonsense.
(1) Try to listen to all the input and (2) then keep experimenting to figure things out.  You can do it, if you persevere...

 
 
 
 

Check your Tegretol levels, ACAMS.... Excuse me for sticking my hand out into the playing field...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 15, 2010, 07:49:29 PM
Are you trying to tell me I can't think for myself?
******s*******
well, I'm leaving this retarded pointless thread (seeing that I found the files)
 
 
*leaves thread*
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 07:52:12 PM
******s*******
What word is that supposed to be?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: ACAMS on January 15, 2010, 07:55:30 PM
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STRTED IT!
come on Reier, lets stop wasting our time...
*leaves thread*

*Re-enters thread*
 
Are you trying to tell me I can't think for myself?
******s*******
well, I'm leaving this retarded pointless thread (seeing that I found the files)
 
 
*leaves thread*

Probably reading this!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Madiaba on January 15, 2010, 07:56:34 PM
Sparkey, I'm just another instrument playing the same ignored song.... And you just proved the point by not listening,...again. 
It's not a rock, but help,..just like the relavant Grammar input.  Do you receive input about yourself at home?  Seems like you're not used to listening to input about yourself.
Clearly stated: No one is throwing rocks here, but just trying to share with you.  Listen better, for the 850 time.
 
 
 
 
Quote
"ACAMS: Probably reading this!"  He is:
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/27080Clipboard01000.jpg)
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Urjak on January 15, 2010, 07:57:27 PM
******s*******
What word is that supposed to be?

Maybe (https://gametechmods.com/forums/file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/IANCON%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png)(https://gametechmods.com/forums/file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/IANCON%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png)malacostracous?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 15, 2010, 08:05:37 PM
Maybe (https://gametechmods.com/forums/file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/IANCON%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png)(https://gametechmods.com/forums/file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/IANCON%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png)malacostracous?
Malacostracous!? Somebody should wash that kid's mouth out with a good mixture of soap and bleach. (Soap to wash out the profanity, and bleach to remove of the tougher stains.)
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 15, 2010, 08:08:45 PM
lol no I've never heard that word anyway lol
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Madiaba on January 15, 2010, 08:18:42 PM
lol no I've never heard that word anyway lol
I'm not surprised.
 
Sacrebleu!...,
Oy vey!...,
Youser!...,
NVM. 
All yours, ACAMS.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: G.K. on January 16, 2010, 01:04:34 AM
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/27080Clipboard01000.jpg)

ACAMS is never going to give up his true ninja ways
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 03:11:33 AM
lol no I've never heard that word anyway lol
Interesting use of lol. You used it like how punctuation is used in Spanish with the sentence beginning with an upside down version of the ending punctuation (save for periods). I would provide a example, but having taken Japanese in high school, I don't know enough about Spanish to do the language justice.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Zog on January 16, 2010, 03:59:39 AM
@frezal


i Do you mean like this !
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Stagfish on January 16, 2010, 04:11:52 AM
i really wish i never made this topic now...
theres grammar lessons and swearing and flame wars
i really am wishing that this thread wasnt made in the first place.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Serge on January 16, 2010, 04:22:52 AM
But I like flamewars! (Even though this isn't one, it's just a permatroll successfully trolling a moron. But I enjoy that, too.)

Also, I want to remind you Sparkey, you have no excuse for making grammar mistakes. You are American, and English is your native tongue. Try to respect it, like I do as a foreigner.

Frezal, you really learned Japanase at HS? You lucky ****.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Naryar on January 16, 2010, 07:42:19 AM
Best WTF thread i've seen in a while.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 01:53:47 PM
@frezal
i Do you mean like this !
Indeed I do. I thought of an example using Spanish. "¿Como se llama?" It roughly translates to, "What is your name?" I learned that about 100 years ago.


i really wish i never made this topic now...
theres grammar lessons and swearing and flame wars
i really am wishing that this thread wasnt made in the first place.
Since multiple grammar lessons exist, you would use are instead of is. As for the swearing and flame wars, I think you've got the wrong thread. Flames wars don't seem to be in this thread. The only "swearing" was when I said sh** and when Sparkles decided to drag crustaceans into this.


Also, I want to remind you Sparkey, you have no excuse for making grammar mistakes. You are American, and English is your native tongue. Try to respect it, like I do as a foreigner.
I always find it humorous when the Speak English or GTFO people fail at English themselves.

Frezal, you really learned Japanase at HS? You lucky **ck.
Yeah, but unfortunately, I don't remember enough to be conversant. I still remember the structure, though, so relearning the language would just be a matter of rebuilding my vocabulary.


If you have the time, I suggest learning it. I may have just had a really good teacher, but it was a very easy language to learn. There are no plurals, and every sentence has the same basic structure. Oh, and to make questions out of sentences, no rephrasing is needed. You just add a か (ka) to the end. Sample I: なまえ は ジェッフ です。(namae wa Jeffu desu.--My name is Jeff.) なまえ は ジェッフ です か? (namae wa Jeffu desu ka?--Is my name Jeff?)
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Serge on January 16, 2010, 03:54:05 PM
Yeah, but unfortunately, I don't remember enough to be conversant. I still remember the structure, though, so relearning the language would just be a matter of rebuilding my vocabulary.


If you have the time, I suggest learning it. I may have just had a really good teacher, but it was a very easy language to learn. There are no plurals, and every sentence has the same basic structure. Oh, and to make questions out of sentences, no rephrasing is needed. You just add a か (ka) to the end. Sample I: なまえ は ジェッフ です。(namae wa Jeffu desu.--My name is Jeff.) なまえ は ジェッフ です か? (namae wa Jeffu desu ka?--Is my name Jeff?)


I was hoping to attend some Japanese lessons, I really want to, but it's insanely expensive. I know a bit about the language's grammar and some words, but it's not much. I envy your knowledge of it, I'd trade my French for some Japanese any day.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 16, 2010, 04:44:28 PM
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STRTED IT!
come on Reier, lets stop wasting our time...
*leaves thread*
Reier attacked me (twice) when I gave you a lesson on grammar. If providing a snarky response somehow means I started any sort of scuffle in this thread, then I'm afraid I'm guilty as charged.

OK, I'm back. Who cares.
 
Jeff, Really, I can't belive you are that blind. You've attacked me and others over and over and now you whine about me making a little joke? Are you that immature? Seriously, about 80% of your posts are insults or arguments. That's sad. If you're that insecure that you have to go around whacking people to raise your self-esteem, then cut it out. Sparky may be a n00b with grammar that's incorrect, but so what? It's not a big deal. I've never really liked you that much but when you threw that tantrum about not being able to swear on the Alpha X topic for absolutley no reason whatsoever, that made me kinda ticked off.  I'd take the biggest n00b on the planet over you.You, S32, infinite, and Serge go out of your way to make other people feel bad, and that's not cool. At all. It doesn't make you seem tough, it makes you seem like a jerk.
I'm positively certain that you are going to attack me with a comeback about me being "immature" or "an idiot", but I really don't care. It will only further my point, and honestly it means nothing coming from someone as big of a hypocrit as yourself. If I am the only person in the whole world who doesn't swear, I won't start. I know I'm right. If everyone on this forum starts attacking me for posting this, I won't care. It needed to be said.
Shape up, shut up, or ship out. I and many others are sick of your bullying.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 04:48:26 PM
ya, jeff and you act like you're the mature one
aslo,i'm gonna statr taking witht bad grammerr t tic u of
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 16, 2010, 04:49:16 PM
Sparkey, stay out of this please. For your own safety.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 04:50:38 PM
Sparkey, stay out of this please. For your own safety.
ya well, I don't want to
I'm tired of him being a:
grammer nazi
languge natzi
RA2 Nazi
life Nazi
Fun nazi
Nazi nazi
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Serge on January 16, 2010, 05:49:48 PM
I and many others are sick of your bullying.
I know this is just going to sound like I'm licking his boots, but, frezal, I wuv you <3.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Reier on January 16, 2010, 06:18:41 PM
Yes it does. Jerks in love are adorable though...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 16, 2010, 06:21:18 PM
Yes it does. Jerks in love are adorable though...

Are you upset?
 
Let's share the love.
 
TUDDLES! <3
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 06:21:29 PM
owned
 
are you people STILL ARGUING???
*kill self*
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: R0B0SH4RK on January 16, 2010, 06:35:18 PM
Reier, I like you, but your sarcasm detectors appear to be shut off.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 06:35:35 PM

OK, I'm back. Who cares.
Questions end with a question mark in the English language. Sample 一: Who cares?
 
Jeff, Really, I can't belive you are that blind. You've attacked me and others over and over and now you whine about me making a little joke?
No whining was done on my part. Sparkles whined about me picking on you, when in reality, you're the one who brought the beef into this thread. When people attack me, they should expect a snarky response. Those who I've attacked have every right to strike back at me.


By the way, really isn't a proper noun, so there's no need to capitalize it in the meat of the sentence sandwich.


Are you that immature?
I don't think immature describes me nor my actions on this board. Nice attempt at an insult, though.


Seriously, about 80% of your posts are insults or arguments.
Now, is that an average of 80% of each post being negative, or 80% of my total posts are negative posts? It's a very big difference, and I'd be interested to know.


That's sad. If you're that insecure that you have to go around whacking people to raise your self-esteem, then cut it out.
Insecure about what? Your high school grasp of psychology seems lacking.


Sparky may be a n00b with grammar that's incorrect, but so what? It's not a big deal.
I really hate that argument. What if Sparkles stated things that were historically inaccurate (Ex. Hitler was the dictator of Italy)? What if Sparkles made math errors? Language errors are just as important as any other errors, and if no attention is brought to them, how will the one committing the errors know that mistakes are being made? You may be fine with mediocrity, but I'm not. We have enough Jay Lenos in the world as it is.


I've never really liked you that much but when you threw that tantrum about not being able to swear on the Alpha X topic for absolutley no reason whatsoever, that made me kinda ticked off.
I explained my reasoning. You could not. Is that what makes you so angry?


I'd take the biggest n00b on the planet over you.
If you were Jeff Goldblum, I might actually care. As it stands, you're just some kid who doesn't question the arbitrary standards set forth by society, and happily promotes mediocrity. Have fun with Sparkles. I'm sure the two of you have much to talk about.


You, S32, infinite, and Serge go out of your way to make other people feel bad, and that's not cool. At all. It doesn't make you seem tough, it makes you seem like a jerk.
Why drag them into this?


I'm positively certain that you are going to attack me with a comeback about me being "immature" or "an idiot", but I really don't care.
Oh, come on. You know I'm far more creative than that.


It will only further my point, and honestly it means nothing coming from someone as big of a hypocrit as yourself.
Hypocrite? How so? You are equally entitled to do all of the things I do on here, and I've never stated otherwise. This post of yours, on the other hand, is much more hypocritical than anything I've ever done. You're calling out my bad behaviour by using similar bad behaviour, thus becoming the very thing you despise.


If I am the only person in the whole world who doesn't swear, I won't start. I know I'm right.
Nobody is saying that you should use words you don't want to use. I don't use the word guesstimate because I see it as being too lame to even use in an ironic way. My objection was to you forcing your unspecified disliking of certain words on others. When pressed for a reason why these words were worse than others of the same meaning, you couldn't come up with anything. Do you still not have a reason for why you find these words offensive, or are you still just doing whatever mommy and daddy say?


If everyone on this forum starts attacking me for posting this, I won't care. It needed to be said.
Shape up, shut up, or ship out. I and many others are sick of your bullying.
If you are too fragile to handle my posts, don't start sh**! I will respond, and I will continue to own you.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sage on January 16, 2010, 06:45:40 PM
Reier, Jeff's "temper tantrum" was actually a 5 page long logical an controlled debate in which we both presented our sides and he eventually proved the better point. I think it's YOU who is throwing the tantrum, not Jeff. I may not agree with many of Jeff's attacks on people, but he's just having fun on a forum. If you feel threatened or can't handle him, stay out of the chatterbox.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 16, 2010, 06:45:58 PM
Hitler wasn't the Dictator of Italy?

The Fairies under my bed were wrong! Wrong I say! O_o

Also, reier: I hate people who act tough online as well.

They should stop, before I deck 'em.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: R0B0SH4RK on January 16, 2010, 06:55:44 PM
Okay guys, let's stop before this gets messy. The funniness of this thread is going down the drain very quickly.

Also IC WUT U DID THAR, S32 :O
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 07:04:51 PM
Hitler wasn't the Dictator of Italy?

The Fairies under my bed were wrong! Wrong I say! O_o

Also, reier: I hate people who act tough online as well.

They should stop, before I deck 'em.
Don't listen to those fairies! They're part of the gestapo!
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Scrap Daddy on January 16, 2010, 07:22:30 PM
Successful troll is successful.

I still wish you were LRA2, though. That would have been the best and longest trolling ever.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 16, 2010, 07:25:22 PM
Frezal makes the Chatterbox his bitch.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 08:13:10 PM
Successful troll is successful.

I still wish you were LRA2, though. That would have been the best and longest trolling ever.
That would have been amazing. Sadly, I don't know if I could be convincing enough as a n00b. I would use a proxy to hide my actual IP, but I don't think I could do the style correctly.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 08:15:30 PM
how about we get ACAMS to delete this thread?
 
 
 
 
LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE STAG!!!! *looks at stag*
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: System32 on January 16, 2010, 08:16:04 PM
Kinda late for that.

Click's issuing temp bans to people who pull it now.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 08:17:28 PM
pull what?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: frezal on January 16, 2010, 08:54:18 PM
Kinda late for that.

Click's issuing temp bans to people who pull it now.
That's why you infiltrate slowly and keep around several accounts, all with different proxies.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: goose on January 16, 2010, 09:07:23 PM
People like frezal and other "trolls" are often hated. In my humble opinion they are absolutely essential for a smooth running and active  forum. While admins and mods can give out infractions and bans, its the frezals of the world that keep the post quality to a higher standard.  Subconsciously you know that you will get pounced on if you get lazy with your posts. Don't get me wrong, there is a line, but historically Frezal has not crossed that line(I have not been around as of late). He has not crossed that line in this thread.
 
Remember this is NOT twitter, facebook, or an instant messenger. You have time to think about what you say and how you post.

I found this thread very amusing.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 16, 2010, 09:11:42 PM
YEAAAAHHH GOOSE IS BACK!
how is the bot exchange coming?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: 090901 on January 16, 2010, 09:14:59 PM
YEAAAAHHH GOOSE IS BACK!
How is the bot exchange coming?
Learn proper grammar
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Pwnator on January 16, 2010, 10:46:32 PM
Best thread evar.

You all win intarnetz. :D
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: pyscolone on January 17, 2010, 12:10:05 AM
I know I haven't been on in awhile but.... but did LRA2 make a new account?
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: ACAMS on January 17, 2010, 12:13:16 AM
It is not Spark Plug.....I checked him the first couple days he was here!
 
LRA2 got unbanned in the forum changeover, so I left him unbanned.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Pwnator on January 17, 2010, 12:14:45 AM
I know I haven't been on in awhile but.... but did LRA2 make a new account?


Yep. He's now known as Avalanche.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: R0B0SH4RK on January 17, 2010, 12:57:24 AM
Avalanche > LRA2

Therefore, LRA2 =/= Avalanche

It's simple math, Pwn.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Stagfish on January 17, 2010, 04:34:54 AM
this thread should be moved to amusement
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Pwnator on January 17, 2010, 04:55:06 AM
Avalanche > LRA2

Therefore, LRA2 =/= Avalanche

It's simple math, Pwn.


New Hydro > Old Hydro


Yet Hydro == Hydro.


:P


And yesh, this should be in amusement. XD
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 04:56:54 AM
Hydro == Hydro.

Difficult maths is difficult
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Pwnator on January 17, 2010, 05:06:13 AM
Being forced to study college calculus at 16 is difficult. >.<
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Naryar on January 17, 2010, 05:07:16 AM
New Hydro > Old Hydro


Yet Hydro == Hydro.

Yes, but New =/= Old , so one of the two following is true

New > Old (1)
New < Old (2)

If the first case is true, as Hydro == Hydro and New > Old, so New + Hydro > Old + Hydro, simplified as New Hydro > Old Hydro

It's just basic math ! and not difficult in any case  :p

Hydro == Hydro.

Difficult maths is difficult

It should be "difficult math are difficult".
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Zog on January 17, 2010, 05:12:59 AM
Can we change the subject now?  :confused:
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Pwnator on January 17, 2010, 05:13:57 AM

Yes, but New =/= Old , so one of the two following is true

New > Old (1)
New < Old (2)

If the first case is true, as Hydro == Hydro and New > Old, so New + Hydro > Old + Hydro, simplified as New Hydro > Old Hydro

It's just basic math ! and not difficult in any case  :p



Yay! I made Nary and R0B0 agree on something! XD


New = Old + time

Since Hydro cannot undergo chemical change through time alone, New Hydro = Old Hydro

Yet New Hydro > Old Hydro

Crap. I just divided by zero. D:




@ Zog - Well, the problem's already resolved. Soo.... yeah. XD
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Naryar on January 17, 2010, 05:22:40 AM

New = Old + time
Since Hydro cannot undergo chemical change through time alone, New Hydro = Old Hydro

Yet New Hydro > Old HydroCrap. I just divided by zero. D:

If you did, you would have ripped off this plane's own fabric and sent us to oblivion... but hopefully you made a basic error...

At his age, he not only can undergo chemical change through time, but is probably doing it as well.

@Zog: No we're having too much fun  :p

 
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Zog on January 17, 2010, 05:25:59 AM
Wah  :embarr


Anyway, you need to send me the drum.py and the bindings for infernal contraption...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 05:38:27 AM
Hydro == Hydro.

Difficult maths is difficult

It should be "difficult math are difficult".

In Britain, my statement is corrent
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: cephalopod on January 17, 2010, 05:46:16 AM
I'm really not sure if this thread is win or... not XD.
Kinda amusing, whatever it is :P
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Madiaba on January 17, 2010, 08:29:10 AM
I like it, especially the unique 'mathz'... :confused: .    I is loining somting.
 
In Mass. 2+2=4, and the sun goes down in the West,... unless you're into politics...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 10:07:11 AM
can we get a mod to delete this thread before I kill myself
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: ACAMS on January 17, 2010, 11:45:16 AM
can we get a mod to delete this thread

Stop saying that!  WE decide when a thread needs deleting.
 
before I kill myself

Stop saying that.....it sounds stupid, and start your sentence off with a capital letter and end with the proper punctuation.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sage on January 17, 2010, 12:12:53 PM
ACAMS, an ellipsis is actually three periods, not 5. They also have a space before and after it is used in a sentence to show a pause in thought.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Naryar on January 17, 2010, 12:15:29 PM
You also need a space between "that" and the exclamation point, and after that exclamation point you just need 1 space, not 2.

Really, these days are a grammar nazi's paradise...
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sage on January 17, 2010, 12:47:45 PM
No Naryar, in modern English there is no space before an exclamation mark. That is only in the French language.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 12:49:48 PM
you guys are still on this???????????????
from replie 12 to replie 104 you've been arguing
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 12:52:56 PM
No Naryar, in modern English there is no space before an exclamation mark. That is only in the French language.
Yeah, but it's more about the typography. French rule of thumb: All two-part punctuation marks get spaces from both sides. English rule of thumb: **** it, put a space after the sign.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: 090901 on January 17, 2010, 12:54:08 PM
You guys are still on this???????????????
From reply 12 to reply 104 you've been arguing.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Jack Daniels on January 17, 2010, 12:57:56 PM
You guys are still on this???????????????
From reply 12 to reply 104 you've been arguing.

If you make a compilation and print all these corrections out like a report, I am pretty sure your English teacher would give you extra credit.

Just an idea.
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: Scrap Daddy on January 17, 2010, 01:29:19 PM
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/993461.PNG)
nd u just lost the game LOLLOOLOL
Title: Re: Limited?
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 01:34:54 PM
Damn you Scrap!  :FFFUUU :FFFUUU :FFFUUU :FFFUUU :FFFUUU :FFFUUU :FFFUUU
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:07:10 PM
I actually loled
 
If that was ment as an insult it did not work
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: 090901 on January 17, 2010, 02:09:12 PM
I actually loled.
 
If that was meant as an insult it did not work.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:12:01 PM
WOULD YOU STOP????? I know You're trying to get a reacton out of me, due to You're pothetic power struggle, but no one thinks it's funny.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Zog on January 17, 2010, 02:20:15 PM
Would you stop? I know you're trying to get a reaction out of me, due to your pathetic power struggle, but no one thinks it's funny.


Couldn't resist...
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: frezal on January 17, 2010, 02:22:33 PM
WOULD YOU STOP????? I know You're trying to get a reacton out of me, due to You're pothetic power struggle, but no one thinks it's funny.
I'd wager that the majority of us do find it funny.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:30:34 PM
It was funny the first couple of times.
And I bet Reier does'nt.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: 090901 on January 17, 2010, 02:33:23 PM
It was funny the first couple of times.
And I bet Reier doesn't .
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 02:40:40 PM
And I bet Reier does'nt.
Look, the n00b found himself a new friend! How sweet of you two <3.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 02:42:02 PM
I couldn't stop laughing after I read that.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:46:01 PM
I couldn't stop laughing after I read that.
Me to actually.
 
and you're probably mad because Re hates you
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 02:47:39 PM
and you're probably mad because Re hates you
To be honest? I couldn't care less.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:49:07 PM
You know what I love? were having two completly diferent Flame Wars in two diferent threads at the same time.
 .
Lets start a thread for this so we don't ruin these.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 02:51:26 PM
Reier doesn't hate me! I don't think.....
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:52:34 PM
uhhhmmmmmmm Kay
 
Were has Re been today anyway?
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: 090901 on January 17, 2010, 02:54:01 PM
uhhhmmmmmmm Kay
 
Were has Re been today anyway?
Living a life off the computer.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 02:57:20 PM
I should do that, to bad it's like 20 degress outside and I can't go anywere
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: System32 on January 17, 2010, 02:59:20 PM
I couldn't stop laughing after I read that.

G.K, there's something brown on your nose.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 02:59:52 PM
Yes Sys, they're called freckles.

@Sparkey: 20 degrees? I wish.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 03:01:03 PM
-4 fahrenheit here.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Jonzu95 on January 17, 2010, 03:04:44 PM
-10 celsius in finland...
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 03:07:34 PM
Sheesh, that's cold guys.

4 celsius here in south east England. Or is it the Marianas Trench?
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 03:08:37 PM
-10 celsius in finland...

Holy crap it's colder in Poland than in Scandinavia.


(-4 f. = -20 c.)
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 03:10:22 PM
Strange. You must be getting it blown over from Poland instead of the Finns getting it.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: somestrangeguy on January 17, 2010, 03:14:23 PM
Well we did have -20 to -27 for 3 days in a row few weeks back. Was not nice walking to the bus.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Jonzu95 on January 17, 2010, 03:17:15 PM
And i went to school on bike and from my home to school is 2 km.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: somestrangeguy on January 17, 2010, 03:29:42 PM
Wait, what computer are you using now? I tough you had to leave and go to your moms place where you dont have internet connection?
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: G.K. on January 17, 2010, 03:30:17 PM
His phone. and ROFL at your PT
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Serge on January 17, 2010, 03:44:40 PM
Well we did have -20 to -27 for 3 days in a row few weeks back. Was not nice walking to the bus.
I FEEL YOUR PAIN, BROTHER.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sage on January 17, 2010, 04:17:46 PM
I went skiing last weekend in -20 F...
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sparkey98 on January 17, 2010, 04:18:53 PM
I hate you sage :mrgreen:
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: R0B0SH4RK on January 17, 2010, 10:28:19 PM
I love this thread so much :O

It's +9 celcius here. Don't ask me what that is in farenheit. I don't believe in your absurd scale based off of people and some really, really cold crap :P

Being forced to study college calculus at 16 is difficult. >.<

Boo-goddam-hoo. My AP Calc teacher was from Serbia. Try learning maths you don't understand in a language you don't understand >.>
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: TriTon on January 18, 2010, 01:30:20 AM
Man, it's 75+ F where I live. The coldest i've ever felt was 38+ F. You guys are all lucky.
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: Sage on January 18, 2010, 10:53:29 AM
If you knew cold, you would know it isn't pleasant all the time... >:O
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: 090901 on January 18, 2010, 02:34:05 PM
Sparkles is now Limited-er
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: somestrangeguy on January 18, 2010, 03:12:04 PM
Sage: QFT
Its not so nice when yours eyes start to gather a thin layer of ice one them! Gotta keep breathing into your eyes just to see in front of you >_>
Title: Re: about limited and grammar lessons
Post by: frezal on January 18, 2010, 03:41:32 PM
Sage: QFT
Its not so nice when yours eyes start to gather a thin layer of ice one them! Gotta keep breathing into your eyes just to see in front of you >_>
When I lived in Pullman, WA, it would often drop into the negatives (in Fahrenheit, nonetheless), and the condensation in my mustache and beard would always freeze. Needless to say, walking up a hill to go to class was awful.