Apologies for the random lag and stuttering.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8zt30_Cwa0&feature=youtu.be# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8zt30_Cwa0&feature=youtu.be#)
Thrackerzod wins 2-1
redace just can't win with wedges
Now, to confirm, "no wedges" != "no chassis wedges", right?
Anyway, GG dude. Cool bot.
I'm so sorry, RedAce, for starting this whole thing.....
Now, to confirm, "no wedges" != "no chassis wedges", right?
Yes. I did mean no wedges, as in " chassis wedges are also banned". And i'm not saying because I lost.
Good game though. Thanks for this Twice.
Yes. I did mean no wedges, as in " chassis wedges are also banned". And i'm not saying because I lost.
If you really did, then I misinterpreted the rules. I could enter something else, if Geice doesn't mind re-hosting (but I guess that's cheating since now I know your bot). Seeing as we weren't playing by the same rules, I don't think the match should count for anything.
if Geice doesn't mind re-hosting (but I guess that's cheating since now I know your bot). Seeing as we weren't playing by the same rules, I don't think the match should count for anything.
In that case, I think I can be allowed to change my bot as well since the first match meant nothing if we are going to do this rematch.
In that case, I think I can be allowed to change my bot as well since the first match meant nothing if we are going to do this rematch.
Well of course; it's not fair to be at a disadvantage because I read the rules wrong
I think 'no wedges' was extremely too vague. It either means nothing at all or means the banning of all wedges due to ambiguity. I have had a little chat with Dragonfire a while ago about Challenge rules and how I think they might be need a bit more polish so rulings are never an issue.
What I would like is no room for ambiguity. For example, for this challenge, the rule of no wedges should have been phrased on the lines of;
Prohibited components: *Forget what the normal wedge is called :P*, EMERGENCY Wedge
Chassis limitations: No wedge shapes
I also think it should also be debated as to whether the host has any blame for allowing Thracker's bot to be accepted, as it's reasonable to believe he may have had doubts accepting the bot if he read 'no wedges'.
I'm sorry if I come off as high and mighty by saying this and seeming like I'm talking for the Challenge Board mods, because I'm definitely not. It's just my view on the matter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwzqFmSkgAc&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwzqFmSkgAc&feature=youtu.be#)
Redace wins 2-1, not sage gets 1 KOplease enter the cauldron
I thought I was doomed when you cloned butt for this match, but Constructor really got around to the drive and took it off.
Good game Thrackerzod. Sorry about the first match shenanigans.
Hey, well, I tried.
The sad thing is that this was the 3rd version of Salty Sailer.
Good jorb dude.
Thanks for hosting, Geice!