[…] you can challenge the belt holder at anytime, similar to that of the original title system, in that belt's meta with any other features being up to the challenge itself. Rules. There will be 4 metas that you can enter. DSL-S, Stock, IF and DSL-IRL. Weightclasses will cycle each month. LW, MW, HW, SHW. Not in that order though.You can enter as many of the different metas as you want.[…]
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
IRL fighting competitions are banned (for title fights)
i say do a best of both worlds systemrun the challenge belt as the main belt (think the major title of WWE, the WWE Championship), and then have individual meta titles (including an IRL title to keep irl people happy, but make it so the IRL title and IRL fights have absolutely no standing in relation to the challenge belt) for all the metas which act as minor titles (like the United States/Intercontinental Championships from WWE). Keeps everybody happy but pares down the titles from about 18 down to 4 (DSL, Stock, IF, IRL). i support the idea of the challenge belt but deleting the old titles doesn't feel right imoeither that or hand the old titles to somebody else to run seperate from the challenge belt. i wouldn't mind running them, but i know i've not been here for much time at all and so i'm not qualified enough.
I've noticed it doesn't include IRL in the poll choice. Will you at least put that as a seperate title so those who like IRL and want to have something to fight over can do that?
perfectly fine system
Quote from: Badger on October 03, 2017, 02:52:09 AMperfectly fine systemRead: "ruleset I was winning under"
Quote from: Mr. AS on October 07, 2017, 03:23:36 PMQuote from: Badger on October 03, 2017, 02:52:09 AMperfectly fine systemRead: "ruleset I was winning under"> implying I was winning because of the ruleset
Quote from: Badger on October 07, 2017, 04:15:05 PMQuote from: Mr. AS on October 07, 2017, 03:23:36 PMQuote from: Badger on October 03, 2017, 02:52:09 AMperfectly fine systemRead: "ruleset I was winning under"> implying I was winning because of the rulesetOkay, lets see what your last few challenge matches have been:-vs Orc for DSL HW title: IRL against someone who rarely builds to win (you actually ended up losing this one, despite entering your usual psuedo-gutripper fare)-vs LRA2 for DSL HW title: IRL against someone who builds to win and seeks "victory at any cost" (in his own words) but fails miserably at it-vs Boto for DSL LW title: IRL against someone who thought submitting a skyscraper was a good idea Looks like you were scooping up titles by trying to curbstomp IRL builders.
Quote from: Mr. AS on October 08, 2017, 03:36:14 AMQuote from: Badger on October 07, 2017, 04:15:05 PMQuote from: Mr. AS on October 07, 2017, 03:23:36 PMQuote from: Badger on October 03, 2017, 02:52:09 AMperfectly fine systemRead: "ruleset I was winning under"> implying I was winning because of the rulesetOkay, lets see what your last few challenge matches have been:-vs Orc for DSL HW title: IRL against someone who rarely builds to win (you actually ended up losing this one, despite entering your usual psuedo-gutripper fare)-vs LRA2 for DSL HW title: IRL against someone who builds to win and seeks "victory at any cost" (in his own words) but fails miserably at it-vs Boto for DSL LW title: IRL against someone who thought submitting a skyscraper was a good idea Looks like you were scooping up titles by trying to curbstomp IRL builders.Because they would only build IRL, and every other mod/meta is pretty dead, so DSL-IRL was my only option for title matches. I even said I'd prefer to do DSL-S matches but nobody would agree.
To qualify to be a contender, you must have had a non-disqualified challenge board battle in the past 3 calendar months from the current month e.g, if it is October, then July 1st would be the cut-off date. Potential contenders will be listed in the Spreadsheet.