gametechmods

Robot Arena Matches => Challenge Board => Topic started by: TheRoboteer on February 22, 2017, 02:42:09 PM

Title: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (Avalanche Wins)
Post by: TheRoboteer on February 22, 2017, 02:42:09 PM

Rules:
DSL 2.2 HW IRL (400-800)
CF Allowed
BFE Allowed
Robot Wars Arena
Cheatbot2 Banned
First to 3 wins

Host:
DemonOfTomorrow

Title: Re: Avalanche VS TheRoboteer
Post by: TheRoboteer on February 23, 2017, 04:46:14 PM

I've already sent my bot to Demon. Just waiting on Avalanche.

Title: Re: Avalanche VS TheRoboteer
Post by: Avalanche on March 02, 2017, 06:43:34 AM

apologies for the delay robot is coming very soon

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: Sage on March 08, 2017, 12:52:32 PM

unlocked thread.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: doot on March 08, 2017, 01:18:05 PM

Thanks, Sage! The match is up now after so much procrastination!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMbnHdT-F-0

The winner is Avalanche, with 3 wins to Roboteer's 0!

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 05:51:35 AM

Right. I've won. Now to win about 3 more just to equal my challenge board points from all the bloody DQ's i've had.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:21:46 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

TIL E Wedges are the current IRL meta.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:53:13 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:21:46 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

TIL E Wedges are the current IRL meta.

hey I need those wedges my robot is worthless without them  if I go against anyone who has them or other component hinge wedges.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 12:02:04 PM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:53:13 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:21:46 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

TIL E Wedges are the current IRL meta.

hey I need those wedges my robot is worthless without them  if I go against anyone who has them or other component hinge wedges.

But Avalanche I thought skirt hinge wedges were Un-IRL  :dumb)

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 12:04:42 PM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 12:02:04 PM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:53:13 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:21:46 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

TIL E Wedges are the current IRL meta.

hey I need those wedges my robot is worthless without them  if I go against anyone who has them or other component hinge wedges.

But Avalanche I thought skirt hinge wedges were Un-IRL  :dumb)

my issue is with skirts as in the long ridiculously thin wedges. Component wedges aren't certain to go under, and can be damaged easier imo. I can agree on them not being exactly IRL though so I'll try and phase them out of my builds.

Title: Re: Avalanche vs TheRoboteer (DQ: Avalanche)
Post by: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 12:06:45 PM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 12:04:42 PM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 12:02:04 PM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:53:13 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:21:46 AM

Quote from: Avalanche on March 09, 2017, 11:18:18 AM

Quote from: TheRoboteer on March 09, 2017, 11:11:10 AM

Sort of broke my own philosophy with Bocuma II in that I didn't spend hours getting the wedge perfect. Thought it was 'good enough' but evidently not. Been working on it a bit more trying to get it lower, though I don't think I can really beat an E-Wedge like that no matter what I do without going COMPLETELY Un-IRL (It's questionable whether or not the small wedges on skirt hinges that I have now are IRL anyway).

Also 3 bursts seem to be better than two, so much so that Avalanche broke his own definition of IRL to use them  :laughing.

Id be a moron to not match the current IRL meta. At least I didn't go the Delta route and use 3 betas or long pneumatic bursts  :dumb)

TIL E Wedges are the current IRL meta.

hey I need those wedges my robot is worthless without them  if I go against anyone who has them or other component hinge wedges.

But Avalanche I thought skirt hinge wedges were Un-IRL  :dumb)

my issue is with skirts as in the long ridiculously thin wedges. Component wedges aren't certain to go under, and can be damaged easier imo. I can agree on them not being exactly IRL though so I'll try and phase them out of my builds.

Lol I'm trying to wind you up. I've used them on my bot too, though I'm trying to phase them out though.

Text Only | Text with Attachments