I'd say change to shinies and swap the Nifty for a Black.
SteelYard Dogs are pathetic, by the way. Heck, all of the Stock AI is. Get the Starcore pack for a greater challenge.
I have no weight for a black
Thanks, Vert. Not sure what to do with remaining weightExtend the chassis a bit and upgrade the drive maybe? And/or use a small wedge on a snapper2/DDT.
Wedges...Thanks, Vert. Not sure what to do with remaining weightExtend the chassis a bit and upgrade the drive maybe? And/or use a small wedge on a snapper2/DDT.
It's a forklift prong-thing, for balance. See pick about the problem for better view.You could extend it out a bit and put a wedge on the end.
Static wedges are terrible, I'd consider adding a Snowplow on there instead. It does need the frontal protection.And TBH, he doesn't need a black battery.
Static wedges are terrible, I'd consider adding a Snowplow on there instead. It does need the frontal protection.It is meant as a stabiliser, I prefer it to a caster.
Get V3, that's what I did.But is it about my level?
But is it about my level?
Needs to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
No room or space, unfortunately.Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
Then rebuild itNo room or space, unfortunately.Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
Anyway, the chassis is pretty tight anyway, I couldn't gain more than 5kgs, I suspect.Then rebuild itNo room or space, unfortunately.Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
To be a good stock builder, you have to be prepared to rebuild over and over again, it's necessaryAnyway, the chassis is pretty tight anyway, I couldn't gain more than 5kgs, I suspect.Then rebuild itNo room or space, unfortunately.Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
And mount what on snappers?
I will on my next bot, but I honestly can't be bothered rebuilding this one, I've been testing it on starcore, results so far, no losses as of yet:To be a good stock builder, you have to be prepared to rebuild over and over again, it's necessaryAnyway, the chassis is pretty tight anyway, I couldn't gain more than 5kgs, I suspect.Then rebuild itNo room or space, unfortunately.Mount them on a snapperNeeds to be invertibleHow? I can't see how I could do that in the weight limit with this setup, without rebuilding the whole bot, which I cannot be bothered to do, honestly. I'll keep it in mind for my next bot, though. ;D
And the low irons will hopefully knock away/break off wedges before they get under the bot.
And mount what on snappers?
Mount the spinners on the snappers, like on this:
Looks quite old-school. Not bad. And that looks like Starcore V1 or something, V4 is MUCH more challenging.The only tutorial that I saw was Sage's, and I can't view that. My computer hates the plugin and I won't download.
Also, learn Snapper Loading. It will allow you to build some seriously compact HS bots.
Haha, that was what I thought snapper loading was, sorry for the bump but it makes me laugh, making another generic MW HS soon, Wedgecutter's descendant.If your using those blue Snapper 2s, then use the side-attachment point for holding the HPZs.
I know how to snapper load now. ;)Haha, that was what I thought snapper loading was, sorry for the bump but it makes me laugh, making another generic MW HS soon, Wedgecutter's descendant.If your using those blue Snapper 2s, then use the side-attachment point for holding the HPZs.
The maces should really face the way they are spinning with the attach point you used. And you know you could shrink that chassis significantly and still have a lot of comfort room in there. Overall solid and it gets the job done.They face down to help with popups and such, hitting the top. I will do another version with the maces in the configuration.
And your computer melted?.....odd
Try it against Fury.Will do soon.
A bit smaller, how much would that gain? 1kg? I'm not looking for perfection here, just something half decent.
It's at 395.? ATM, getting 1kg won't give me anything, unfortunately.2 to 3 kg would give you enough for another castor
But would I gain that by rebuilding it?A better bot
Not if I only gain 1 kg, I can't do anything with it. In fact, a larger chassis has more HP, so if I can't gain enough for another castor, then it actually makes the bot worse.Fair point, but there is definitely room for improvement, it is far from the best MW HS around
Not if I only gain 1 kg, I can't do anything with it. In fact, a larger chassis has more HP, so if I can't gain enough for another castor, then it actually makes the bot worse.Fair point, but there is definitely room for improvement, it is far from the best MW HS around
Everyone can be, or at least very close, given enough effort.Not if I only gain 1 kg, I can't do anything with it. In fact, a larger chassis has more HP, so if I can't gain enough for another castor, then it actually makes the bot worse.Fair point, but there is definitely room for improvement, it is far from the best MW HS around
Not everyone can be the best, Vertigo. And how much experience have the best had compared to TRB?
Yes they can, and everyone should aim for it, TRB is building a HS, he should build it to the best he can, not build it so it's alright and then give up on itNot everyone can be the best, Vertigo. And how much experience have the best had compared to TRB?Not if I only gain 1 kg, I can't do anything with it. In fact, a larger chassis has more HP, so if I can't gain enough for another castor, then it actually makes the bot worse.Fair point, but there is definitely room for improvement, it is far from the best MW HS around
Okay, as for what you should aim for now:Done all except the DDT wedge, changed to snapper 2, the wedge is improved! It's now 391 kgs
Rubbers
2 Supervolts
DSA
8 razors, 4 on each ddt
DDT wedge
Small wedge component
Two extenders to attatch the small wedge in the middle of the bot (you will need this with the chassis you will have to make)
AKA, the Psyc popup
I know my opinion isn't worth much (if anything) but great job TRB! Better than anything I could ever do.Not necessarily, stick at it, we all lost to EMERGENCY at some point ;)
EMERGENCY is the boss of the tutorial level.I know my opinion isn't worth much (if anything) but great job TRB! Better than anything I could ever do.Not necessarily, stick at it, we all lost to EMERGENCY at some point ;)
OK.Off the top of my head, bot-editing software.
Any way without snappers?
OK.servo's or axle mounts :P
Any way without snappers?
axle mounts are the worst way though.
Don't they wobble, though?axle mounts are the worst way though.
But the smallest and lightest, thus must efficient
Nope, definately not for drive, they're far too unstable.axle mounts are the worst way though.
But the smallest and lightest, thus must efficient
Ah yes, AXLE mounts! =DYou'd snapper load the axles atachment point off.
Wait, how do you axle load with axle mounts?
And what about bursting motors? I remember somewhere hearing about a motor being bursted, or boosted or something.
The whole robot is covered in Razor wire. ;)Except razor wire is legit, as it literally wraps around the whole robot, without interesting anything.
Anything I could improve?Why the angle connectors? O,o
I don't think he was able to raise the BA's, because the Redbirds would get in the way. If he did use Extenders, he'd save at most 4kg, which I think might give him enough weight for HPZ drive, if he did a bit of chassis reshuffling.
2 HPZ screws up the driving I bet. And no invertibility kills it, along with the low-ish weapon weight. It's just weird...
Use a SnapperII setup, or if not mount the RAD the normal way and lower the chassis. Should go with 90 degree anchor pointing out and use a T connector or something. And don't have the HP Z-teks upside down.But It's around 14kgs, right? and that doesn't include extenders. This setup, with extenders, is 10ks, IIRC.
S_M should probably know if one RAD is strong enough drive or not.
But It's around 14kgs, right? and that doesn't include extenders. This setup, with extenders, is 10ks, IIRC.Yeah but you save chassis weight by not having to make space for the RAD and get both faster and more protected motors (as long as you find a good setup).
At least it's original, and pretty decent.Yeah, but I have no AI packs. =P
but fighting berserker ? srsly ? berserker is just plain AWFUL.
well smashy might've had a little help :pIt's kind of a giveaway when it says you're my DSL mentor on my wiki page :gawe:
I NEED MINIONS, IDIOTIC MORTALSOk.
Thanks. =D
Well, I couldn't let Smashy get too far ahead, now could I? Anyway, when you're making a decal, do you save the .tga file as 16bits/pixel, 24bits/pixel or 32bits/pixel? I tried 16-bit and it doesn't seem to work. does it even work as a .tga? Do i need to use .bmp instead?
Thanks. =Diirc it's 24-bit and non-rle compressed
Well, I couldn't let Smashy get too far ahead, now could I? Anyway, when you're making a decal, do you save the .tga file as 16bits/pixel, 24bits/pixel or 32bits/pixel? I tried 16-bit and it doesn't seem to work. does it even work as a .tga? Do i need to use .bmp instead?
well smashy might've had a little help :pIt's kind of a giveaway when it says you're my DSL mentor on my wiki page :gawe:
HRRK ONE WHEEL BOTS:trollface No problem.
S_MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM YOU MONSTER
Nice bot. :)
Thinking about it, would I be able to use the Rupt glitch on AcroBOTics?I don't think it would work that well, as Gazea said.
Should I bother posting the Hammer?
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/22439Drive.png)um well maybe you should get a cleaner setup first before you try anything, seriously its messy as heck
and it takes about 20-30 mins to stack blacks-just keep stacking them eventually it'll take 15 minutes, 12, 10, 5, and then you will be able to just slap down two blacks at some point
It's not a matter of practice. For example, just now I literally stack 2 blacks in less than 10 seconds, but I've been trying for about 15 mins on the next pair. It's pretty frustrating.make sure you're zoomed all the way via the chassis tab, and make sure the view is a birds eye view and EXACTLY looking over the chassis (straight wall of the chassis should be stright lines, not bent to the right or left), switch to components, and place the batt, if it doesnt stack in about a minute of wiggling the mouse via autohotkey over it just go back to chassis rotate the view 90 degrees and repeat
OK, AW 1-wheel HS. As usual, any advice would be greatly appreciated.ummm.... because you have the same weapon count as the BW in Logic Probe's team, try beating it(if you can, it's an awesome AW).
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/36530AWHS.png)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/50000AWHS2.png)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/92552AWHS3.png)
I can't see a team called 'Logic probe' in Starcore, which pack is it in?no, i meant the team which logic probe is in(spin doctors).
You could also look at SM and NFX's AWs for some ideas on what you could do with it.I made an AW?
You could also look at SM and NFX's AWs for some ideas on what you could do with it.I made an AW?
1 wheel = way forwardsUmm.......... i think you can just use 6 razors to balance the entire thing out.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/15708proof.png)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/95622Bear Grylls.png)
Why didn't I think of that? -_- It worked surprisingly well, actually, but nevertheless:1 wheel = way forwardsUmm.......... i think you can just use 6 razors to balance the entire thing out.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/15708proof.png)
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/95622Bear%20Grylls.png)
You could mount the RAD with the long side against the battery to reduce chassis size. That might free up some weight, and if you dropped to plastic, or lightened up your extender work, you might be able to get a third razor/mace on there instead of an iron.Will do.
Beats Tempus Fugit 75% of the time. (1 loss in the 4 battles I did.)V4 or V3?
I'm almost certain one of the wheels is higher than the other on that bot.. I might just be going crazy though
Ah right, I was wondering if the asymmetrical wheel setup would've hindered the bot in any way but RA2 physics to the rescue I guessI'm almost certain one of the wheels is higher than the other on that bot.. I might just be going crazy though
You're correct. But it still works perfectly fine, same as the similar bot I built like this one.
It's people like you who ruin tourneys. Instead of entering for fun, with the offchance to win, you enter a cheap ass bot that's highly likely to win and kill all of the fun of the tourney and make the hosts life dull.I can always enter my FSnS to kill his.
I hope you're happy.
It's people like you who ruin tourneys. Instead of entering for fun, with the offchance to win, you enter a cheap ass bot that's highly likely to win and kill all of the fun of the tourney and make the hosts life dull.Yup. ;)
I hope you're happy.
Any tips on how to improve the extender setup?It's people like you who ruin tourneys. Instead of entering for fun, with the offchance to win, you enter a cheap ass bot that's highly likely to win and kill all of the fun of the tourney and make the hosts life dull.I can always enter my FSnS to kill his.
I hope you're happy.
Razors stand no chance against bearclaws in a de-weapon fight, and the way it is set up is just asking for the extenders to break.
The tourney is done by AI, so the only fun that I can get out of it is by doing moderately well. What's the fun in building a *cool* bot if it's only going to get torn to pieces?
you can make a cool bot and do moderately well.It's people like you who ruin tourneys. Instead of entering for fun, with the offchance to win, you enter a cheap ass bot that's highly likely to win and kill all of the fun of the tourney and make the hosts life dull.Yup. ;)
I hope you're happy.
The tourney is done by AI, so the only fun that I can get out of it is by doing moderately well. What's the fun in building a *cool* bot if it's only going to get torn to pieces?
Who the heck said you should only enter bots for "FUN" in tournaments, and that entering to win is a bad thing ? I'm going to punch this guy in the face right now.The idea of bots being built to win being "cheap ass" is discrediting to virtually any effeciency builder. Bumble Bee is arguably cheap but it's still a good bot and well developed, likewise with virtually every flail SnS and so on that people whine about. So yeah, give it a rest Marty.
What is problematic as a builder, however, is that you are entering a cheap clone of a design without thinking much, instead of coming up with an interesting, original design.
It would be alright if you attempted to IMPROVE the design, but since it's actually worse, the point is moot.
You didn't created or innovated on this design, therefore you have no right to spam it in tournaments.
But that's just as boring. Building a bunch of bots within the community's botched idea of cool is just going to reduce the variation of bots in a tourney. Make more of an effort towards making your bots effective without necessarily sacrificing rule of cool would probably be better.you can make a cool bot and do moderately well.It's people like you who ruin tourneys. Instead of entering for fun, with the offchance to win, you enter a cheap ass bot that's highly likely to win and kill all of the fun of the tourney and make the hosts life dull.Yup. ;)
I hope you're happy.
The tourney is done by AI, so the only fun that I can get out of it is by doing moderately well. What's the fun in building a *cool* bot if it's only going to get torn to pieces?
Who the heck said you should only enter bots for "FUN" in tournaments, and that entering to win is a bad thing ? I'm going to punch this guy in the face right now.The idea of bots being built to win being "cheap ass" is discrediting to virtually any effeciency builder. Bumble Bee is arguably cheap but it's still a good bot and well developed, likewise with virtually every flail SnS and so on that people whine about. So yeah, give it a rest Marty.
What is problematic as a builder, however, is that you are entering a cheap clone of a design without thinking much, instead of coming up with an interesting, original design.
It would be alright if you attempted to IMPROVE the design, but since it's actually worse, the point is moot.
You didn't created or innovated on this design, therefore you have no right to spam it in tournaments.
Once again, only further discrediting my effort, in this case 3 hours of building and 2 of testing. I'm not going to deliberately make my bots worse just so everyone else has a better chance. If that makes my bot boring, deal with it.Who the heck said you should only enter bots for "FUN" in tournaments, and that entering to win is a bad thing ? I'm going to punch this guy in the face right now.The idea of bots being built to win being "cheap ass" is discrediting to virtually any effeciency builder. Bumble Bee is arguably cheap but it's still a good bot and well developed, likewise with virtually every flail SnS and so on that people whine about. So yeah, give it a rest Marty.
What is problematic as a builder, however, is that you are entering a cheap clone of a design without thinking much, instead of coming up with an interesting, original design.
It would be alright if you attempted to IMPROVE the design, but since it's actually worse, the point is moot.
You didn't created or innovated on this design, therefore you have no right to spam it in tournaments.
Coming from the guy who has single handedly made me bored of my own tourney....
By cool I'm talking about hybrids, so I don't see how that would cut down on variation.
But that's just as boring. Building a bunch of bots within the community's botched idea of cool is just going to reduce the variation of bots in a tourney. Make more of an effort towards making your bots effective without necessarily sacrificing rule of cool would probably be better.
Ah, fair enough. Still most Hybrids are weaker than standard bot types and are already confined to fairly accepted setups.By cool I'm talking about hybrids, so I don't see how that would cut down on variation.
But that's just as boring. Building a bunch of bots within the community's botched idea of cool is just going to reduce the variation of bots in a tourney. Make more of an effort towards making your bots effective without necessarily sacrificing rule of cool would probably be better.
this is why i dont do stock, it looks so complicated yet so cool at the same time!It looks more complicated than it is because everything is intersecting each other, it would actually be pretty easy to understand with a diagram. Still, it's annoying to build, stacking everything took hours by itself, thank god I have some good music to listen to and 2 monitors.
Last post: 31-10-2012Who knew there was 31 months? :dumb)
I never saw the logic in MM/DD/YYLast post: 31-10-2012Who knew there was 31 months? :dumb)
Anyway, about the bot. Seems like a regular 36hs. More experienced builders already gave advice so I won't be giving any.
Also, yay, stock!
WW
EEW
SW
MEEM
With W being a weapon motor, E being extender, M being a drive motor and S being a snapper? Gets around RO7 and uses all 3 free APs on 2 attached extenders. Weapon motors are uneven but oh well.
I mean yeah that works. Ugly as sin though. Also, how you gonna attach the ramplate? ;)I'll work that out later :P
I mean yeah that works. Ugly as sin though. Also, how you gonna attach the ramplate? ;)I'll work that out later :P
I can't think of another way to get 6 ztecs onto 1 snapper.
Managed to get it all on 1 snapperWhat's the extender setup ? It looks really sloppy.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/56340fail.png)
Few problems:
The bot shakes vertically like it has parkinsons, even when idle. It's actually so weird.
I messed up the ramplate extender work so I just removed it to make it cleaner
Forgot to raise the snapper 2 ticks
I'll remake it tomorrow or friday and get it all right.
It's pretty bad. I made this ages ago, but IIRC this was the setup:Managed to get it all on 1 snapperWhat's the extender setup ? It looks really sloppy.
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/56340fail.png)
Few problems:
The bot shakes vertically like it has parkinsons, even when idle. It's actually so weird.
I messed up the ramplate extender work so I just removed it to make it cleaner
Forgot to raise the snapper 2 ticks
I'll remake it tomorrow or friday and get it all right.
eeeh, i'm not convinced aesthetics-wise. mostly due to 2 different extenders and weapon choice, also it's asymetrical.The different colour extenders was to make it easier when building what tribars were to hold which weapons. I'll BFE the red back to back, BRB
to help with mobility, try attaching the lowest weapon extender to the side ap of the extender directly attached to the tribar, like thisHeyy, that's pretty smart. brb.
(http://i.imgur.com/GQvPMLx.png)
also that agod isnt anything to worry about. be glad it isnt something like this
(http://i.imgur.com/Z1TRrDm.png)
Can we see the insides of the first one? I think you have another burst motor in there that allows for it to work as a front hinged flipper?idk. It gutrips more than a wammer which is nice.
As for the second, was going to ask how that works, but is that really better than building a wammer instead?
question: why do you even have the snappers mounted to the t extender? you should be able to attach them directly to the baseplate.I'm guessing he made the chassis smaller- no wait the other snapper2's are already there. Think it's there for space(althrough it doesn't give much and might make the snapper2's vunerable, unless that position was wanted to have a wider attack hitbox).
Guys, the battery and control board are in that gap or I'm sure he would have.Right, that's why he said he removed the battery(guess that was snapper loaded in there?) CB is probably on top of the Snapper 2.
Who is this "TheRoyalBadger" dude. Sounds like a more narcissistic version of Badger.Lol
Who is this "TheRoyalBadger" dude. Sounds like a more narcissistic version of Badger.Drive attached to baseplate and rubber wheels
Anyway, nice juggler, but I feel the claws might hinder due to the normals. Impressed with the good wedges on it as well. What did you slip the game for that to happen?
it's a waste of weight to use 2 extenders to attach weapons like that on the HS, plus it makes them a lot more fragile and more likely to fall off.Yes it's inefficient, but how else am I gonna get the weapons on. Don't feel like removing a weapon motor and putting 3 maces per tribar. I actually chose maces over irons to better protect the extenders. In the (single) test fight vs another HS almost all of the extenders were there by the time all the maces had fallen off.
Think he might mean how you can rotate them sideways(in the direction that the HS spins) and put 3 maces on that way?it's a waste of weight to use 2 extenders to attach weapons like that on the HS, plus it makes them a lot more fragile and more likely to fall off.Yes it's inefficient, but how else am I gonna get the weapons on. Don't feel like removing a weapon motor and putting 3 maces per tribar. I actually chose maces over irons to better protect the extenders. In the (single) test fight vs another HS almost all of the extenders were there by the time all the maces had fallen off.
Who is this "TheRoyalBadger" dude. Sounds like a more narcissistic version of Badger.Heh, thought about that as well when I first read this thread.
Anyway, nice juggler, but I feel the claws might hinder due to the normals. Impressed with the good wedges on it as well. What did you slip the game for that to happen?
Not sure that the switch to plastic for HP drive would be worth, especially considering I'd have to make the chassis larger. The problem with it ATM is the normals combined with the fact that it gets raped by HS, I think.
Not sure that the switch to plastic for HP drive would be worth, especially considering I'd have to make the chassis larger. The problem with it ATM is the normals combined with the fact that it gets raped by HS, I think.Thought that HP's would still fit in there even if I knew that they have a bigger collision box. Upon closer view I see that you made this chassis without the grid?
can you reduce AGODs
> yoshi cityyes then
> missing comic sans and lame-ass 80s graphics
it's been 10 years since rtz strimMY BOY
That's a pretty decent use of 7 kgs, although I don't think it would matter much if that thing's a Havok bomb.4Head
that first bot is technically illegal since you can't attach zteks to extenders like thatI don't get it. Did he bfe them or what
why didnt you just remove one of the 140cm extenders on the orginal and them use a 20 cm extender on each side to space out the first set of z teks :dumb)Because if I removed one of the 140cm extenders the snapper axle would rotate backward whenever the bot would move forward. It's why the 140cm extenders are there on the first version in the first place
that looks pretty dam intimidating but the exposed motor could be a problem.(http://i.imgur.com/SSAHT37.png)
MW to test wedges on? anything but OA3
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/36887Pissed off Sabrina (2).jpg)that looks pretty dam intimidating but the exposed motor could be a problem.(http://i.imgur.com/SSAHT37.png)
MW to test wedges on? anything but OA3
Oops, sorry
You could extend the rear part of the chassis further so you can rotate the HPZs properly.I could, but they don't cause any issues as is so I don't see the point in bothering tbh
Having to do that 2x nifty+cb stack was a huge PITA, just RA2CF'd it on the rebuild once I knew I could do it.
just RA2CF'dAnd no surprises were had.
You find stacking fun? :Sjust RA2CF'dAnd no surprises were had.
But seriously dude, how is that even fun. like what's the point
is the stack even worth it? a black's more powerful and allows for an even larger chassis for stabilityNot sure if you can do this setup with a black. Probably can. Lemme go try it, brb
That's awesome lookingty mate, all credits to Geice for the design.
(http://i.imgur.com/wcMXZ0R.png)if it only has a snapper2 weapon like most lightweights, it just needs a black at the very most. the ramplates look cool but an actual chassis wedge would probably be more effective. also it's hard to tell but the wedge extenders might be too long, making it prone to being flanked
The Shining Dragon, 1 black 1 nifty, 4 razors on a snapper2, 397.8kg
Probably gonna enter this, cause the VS get destroyed by HS and so too does Snake Bite.
WutFacetwitchfaaag
the drive is triggering meHow so? It's nearly symmetrical :P
but yeah i guess it does look slightly cleaner
I really dig that, but the DDTs are a bit exposedeh, bot is max width and the ramplates half cover them. I tested it a ton to get the wedges right (it originally had bracket wedges instead of ramplates on the top, rubber wheels, no razors, and even further back had 4 small air tanks instead and 2 pistons) and the ramplates dies to HS a long-ass time before the DDTs go. The 140cm extenders have no HP too so yeah, they usually go after the ramplates.
It's probably because of the extra razor on the DDT, so that's 9 more kg it has to swing. It should be just as fast as a Snapper2 if it only has 4-5 razors.Actually, both the bots have 6 razors (2 per burst).
sweet stack btw
wat how is that bad against hsguessing it gets deweaponed too fast and then the HS WBP
might as well mount the motors onto the wedge snappers and see if that works
So is it all on one axle?No on 12 separate axles because I can
RA2CF makes wiring even more fun!
(https://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/94304stock in 2017.png)
nice build. sucks about the agod thoughI actually don't think it would be too hard on a rebuild, but ATM I only have 1 extender per snapper, and every AP of those extenders are used. If I were to rebuild I would 100% replace the extra maces for a few plows or caster armour, as well as mounting the snappers on their side which IIRC mitigates the chance of AGOD.
wondering if getting some plows or ramplates on there instead of 6 maces would be good, but honestly it would be a super pain in the can to do
Well done, you made Black Bear. i have copyright on this 36hs setup. :PIt's stock, nothing is new unless it's out of Geice's showcase ;)
and exactly HOW many BAs are in that whopper of a stack?Only 3, BAs are pretty easy to stack.