Behind Bars never looked so good... [ Quoting of attachment images from other messages is not allowed ]
I think SM is a pretty cool guy, eh builds unicycle-bots and doesn't afraid of anything
5Z can definitely be invertible. I'm also not sure how useful casters are on the base of a LW. Would work better with side defence imo.
ALERT- Another WS coming up...
I'm fine with hugging reier
you can make a caster LW HS invertible.
Quote from: Squirrel_Monkey on December 10, 2018, 10:52:44 AM5Z can definitely be invertible. I'm also not sure how useful casters are on the base of a LW. Would work better with side defence imo.5Z has castors, which make it immune to popups. This also makes it stable.Side defence isn't a necessity on a HS like this, but it IS something to think about. Thanks for the tip.
Quote from: Redalert on December 10, 2018, 12:08:51 PMQuote from: Squirrel_Monkey on December 10, 2018, 10:52:44 AM5Z can definitely be invertible. I'm also not sure how useful casters are on the base of a LW. Would work better with side defence imo.5Z has castors, which make it immune to popups. This also makes it stable.Side defence isn't a necessity on a HS like this, but it IS something to think about. Thanks for the tip.In what world are popups the threat to a 1WD HS? You want to protect your wheel and weapon motor more than your baseplate. If you insist on the bottom armour then at least make it invertible.
i refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge insteadcan we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunky
Quote from: Badnik96 on December 10, 2018, 11:02:25 PMi refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge insteadcan we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunkyA. Yes, I'll see if I can flip the weapon motor. Thanks for that.B. My forums are no swear zones. WTC is actually very effective, and too many pokers in the AI use HP zteks. I want a variety.C. HTGC has leftover weight. members of GTM want me to built to the weight limit. The chassis is too small for a snapper. There will very likely be more FS in 2.0 that use wedges.D. "Chunky" more like "Bulky" I'll bring up a screenshot of the internals when I can.E. Instant Fun has 4 pinks. It's not underpowered.
Quote from: Redalert on December 11, 2018, 08:39:47 AMQuote from: Badnik96 on December 10, 2018, 11:02:25 PMi refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge insteadcan we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunkyA. Yes, I'll see if I can flip the weapon motor. Thanks for that.B. My forums are no swear zones. WTC is actually very effective, and too many pokers in the AI use HP zteks. I want a variety.C. HTGC has leftover weight. members of GTM want me to built to the weight limit. The chassis is too small for a snapper. There will very likely be more FS in 2.0 that use wedges.D. "Chunky" more like "Bulky" I'll bring up a screenshot of the internals when I can.E. Instant Fun has 4 pinks. It's not underpowered.Dude, Just take the feedback everyone is giving you, if you ignore it then you will continue to make robots that will be criticized, and then you will post saying about "How everyone is insulting you and your doing nothing wrong" That is only becsause you ignored their feedback, if you take the criticism, shape the robots up, and Listen to them, you will improve. Stop being so dense.
Quote from: Team Code Red Robotics on December 11, 2018, 08:58:35 AMQuote from: Redalert on December 11, 2018, 08:39:47 AMQuote from: Badnik96 on December 10, 2018, 11:02:25 PMi refuse to believe someone as enthusiastic about ra2 is this dense. i've already told you to never use n-12s. flip the weapon motor over so the black bit isnt sticking out and it should run inverted fine.instant fun needs a nifty to be full powered, and wtc is super ****ing slow for a poker, especially for one with axe heads'youre wasting a ton of weight with the irons on the extenders on htgc and it would probably work better if it had a wedge insteadcan we get insides on wedgebreaker? it definitely looks a little chunkyA. Yes, I'll see if I can flip the weapon motor. Thanks for that.B. My forums are no swear zones. WTC is actually very effective, and too many pokers in the AI use HP zteks. I want a variety.C. HTGC has leftover weight. members of GTM want me to built to the weight limit. The chassis is too small for a snapper. There will very likely be more FS in 2.0 that use wedges.D. "Chunky" more like "Bulky" I'll bring up a screenshot of the internals when I can.E. Instant Fun has 4 pinks. It's not underpowered.Dude, Just take the feedback everyone is giving you, if you ignore it then you will continue to make robots that will be criticized, and then you will post saying about "How everyone is insulting you and your doing nothing wrong" That is only becsause you ignored their feedback, if you take the criticism, shape the robots up, and Listen to them, you will improve. Stop being so dense.I do listen to them. I do plan to do something about HTGC's weight issue, and I do plan to flip the weapon motor on the HS over.
Ok then, it seems you are ignoring feedback sometimes
what? no you weren't. this bot was made by acams in 2004(Image removed from quote.)people just know they suck and dont build them