Poll

Which robot is going to win Robot Wars 2016?

Apollo
Beast
Behemoth
Big Nipper
Bonk!
Carbide
Chimera
Chompalot
Crazy Coupe 88
Dantomkia
Disconstructor
Draven
Eruption
Foxic
Gabriel
Glitterbomb
Infernal Contraption
Ironside 3
Kan-Opener
Kill-E Crank-E
King B Remix
MR Speed Squared
Nuts
Or Te
Overdozer
PP3D
Pulsar
Razer
Sabretooth
Shockwave
Storm 2
Supernova
Sweeney Todd
Terror Turtle
Terrorhurtz
The General
Thermidor 2
Thor
Tough As Nails
TR2

Author Topic: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread  (Read 30818 times)

Offline RageTester

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 18
  • Rep: 0
  • robotrage.pro RETRO ACTION GAME
    • View Profile
    • robotrage.pro
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #260 on: August 28, 2016, 10:19:11 AM »
5th episode proves why 4 way rumble is bad for this type of competition...
This is not team match, and yet I can clearly see 2 bots working against 1 numerous times...

2nd chance, from packing to go home to winning their way through to grand final...
I know they got serious drive problems, but now I am rooting for them to end on top...

No doubt Razer could have won again...

RETRO ACTION GAME robotrage.pro
ROBOT RAGE REARMED, LET THE WARS BEGIN

Offline Jonzu95

  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 12636
  • Rep: -27
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #261 on: August 28, 2016, 03:01:32 PM »

Offline Jakewilliamson

  • Founder of Yugioh Robotics
  • Middleweight
  • Posts: 290
  • Rep: 0
  • Fully Charged!
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #262 on: August 28, 2016, 03:05:47 PM »

Offline Thyrus

  • *
  • Posts: 6218
  • Rep: 19
  • Back to purple '17
    • http://www.youtube.com/Th
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #263 on: August 28, 2016, 03:12:06 PM »
Good final. Good choice for the wildcard. Felt bad for it tough. The two bots that made the final were great. The winning bot deserved that as beeing the only veteran regularly qualifying for the final.

The judges interviews are annoying af as they just explain what we all just saw.

So for season 2 they have to bring back the old format. As what happened to thor costd alot of money and it's a lot of stress to repair things in a short time to be somewhat mobile again. Every fight against thor in the head to head was a wildcard. Especially after carbite was done with it.
Also make the arena and housebots less agressive again.
Yes the old format could be seen as unfair as you only get one chance and when you f up you're out but  hey that's how a freaking tournament works.

Offline R01

  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 769
  • Rep: 1
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #264 on: August 28, 2016, 03:14:49 PM »
Good final match, good thing it wasn't one of those where the link gets knocked out 3 seconds into it. However this showed why the round robin system can be complete garbage:
Full Battle reviews:
JP had some good commentary moments this episode but did say some garbage again. Hope they can just get rid of those fake drama moments for the show and be more accurate(also acknowledge the old series instead of always saying "this never happened before").
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 04:06:29 PM by R01 »
Tournament History:
Showcases:
https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php?topic=18882.0
https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php?topic=19197.0

Offline wakkydude

  • The Discourse
  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 571
  • Rep: 1
  • NotLikeThis NotLikeThis
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #265 on: August 28, 2016, 05:03:21 PM »
I personally liked the effects of the new format, even though I can see the logistical problems that it caused due to the requirement to keep repairing even when against hugely damaging opponents. I liked the opportunities it gave for failing teams to get back into the fight, it increased the amount of content per episode, and it led to some moments that we wouldn't have had if it wasn't in place (after all, the allowance for failure is the only reason we got Carbide past the first heat, after its defeat to Terrorhurtz). That said though I see the issues people have raised - I'm really not sure what a good compromise is because I really don't quite want to give up the advantages myself.

Offline Badger

  • Permanent Artifact
  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 6318
  • Rep: 3
  • I wish to be with my people
  • Awards BOTM Winner Donated money for site hosting 2019
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #266 on: August 28, 2016, 05:06:33 PM »
I just think it's poorly thought out. Like you get rid of half the bots in each heat in the first match and then squeeze as many matches as you can out of the remaining half, and in the process screw over bots who are matched vs spinners first. I wouldn't be surprised to see someone in
just driving into the pit or pretending they're dead from the start to avoid getting rekt by the spinner.
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
Google Drive with my newer bots

Offline wakkydude

  • The Discourse
  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 571
  • Rep: 1
  • NotLikeThis NotLikeThis
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #267 on: August 28, 2016, 08:58:21 PM »
I just think it's poorly thought out. Like you get rid of half the bots in each heat in the first match and then squeeze as many matches as you can out of the remaining half, and in the process screw over bots who are matched vs spinners first. I wouldn't be surprised to see someone in
just driving into the pit or pretending they're dead from the start to avoid getting rekt by the spinner.

Yeah, there are obvious weaknesses, with the group battles being the absolute pinnacle of the failures.

It's a shame because these problems are virtually unavoidable through having such a format: due to the way robot combat works, damage can rack up easily. I guess in theory it worked a lot better than it did in practice - but if they get rid of it completely and don't try to learn from it in some way I just think it'll be a shame to see some of its positive aspects gone. It was definitely something worth trying at the bare minimum.

Offline JoeBlo

Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #268 on: August 29, 2016, 07:00:43 AM »

Offline Thyrus

  • *
  • Posts: 6218
  • Rep: 19
  • Back to purple '17
    • http://www.youtube.com/Th
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #269 on: August 29, 2016, 08:44:35 AM »

Reminds me of a certain hardcore robot from a certain show that has battles with bots from a certain year 2015 in a certain way

Offline R01

  • Heavyweight
  • Posts: 769
  • Rep: 1
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #270 on: August 29, 2016, 10:23:12 AM »
Heh, was going to mention that.
Tournament History:
Showcases:
https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php?topic=18882.0
https://gametechmods.com/forums/index.php?topic=19197.0

Offline AHeapOfGames

  • Antweight
  • Posts: 72
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #271 on: August 29, 2016, 01:05:09 PM »
Afraid to say that I really disliked the final. I don't think Thor was a great wildcard, and it went on to be just dead weight in the head-to-heads, only because Pulsar decided to break down straight away...

I think the format needs changing. It ruined this grand final.

Offline jackster96

  • Lightweight
  • Posts: 201
  • Rep: 0
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #272 on: August 29, 2016, 01:32:51 PM »
Afraid to say that I really disliked the final. I don't think Thor was a great wildcard, and it went on to be just dead weight in the head-to-heads, only because Pulsar decided to break down straight away...

I like the new format as it offers more fights but with that it does come with its issues.
So you didn't like the final because the robot that performed the best out of the selection got the wild card and that pulsar got knocked out straight away to no ones shock with its reliability erm okay then o_O


Says that these robots failed to qualify just to name a few Iron awe 5 & 7, manta and maelstrom? wonder if it was due to the limited spaces or if they wanted more variety?
Hobbies; table tennis, archery, pool, gaming pc and xbox.

Offline RedAce

  • Host of The Award Winning Deathmatch Series
  • *
  • Posts: 3966
  • Rep: 21
  • Yep, I'm that RedAce guy.
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: redaceofsp4des
  • Discord: ThatRedAceGuy#3618
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #273 on: August 29, 2016, 06:51:04 PM »

Also, I pretty much agree with Thyrus to bring the old battle format back.

Offline WeN

  • #1 Malaysian Idiot
  • Ultra Heavyweight
  • Posts: 1938
  • Rep: 8
  • totsugeki!!!
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • Discord: thatwenguy
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #274 on: August 29, 2016, 07:02:09 PM »
I also agree to bring the old battle format back.

Offline MassimoV

  • I Move Weight
  • *
  • Posts: 8929
  • Rep: 24
  • I make rap for people of Serbia
    • MassimoVTV
  • Awards BOTM Winner
    • View Profile
    • Mourning Glory
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: myhandsarefood
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #275 on: August 30, 2016, 12:17:26 AM »
Lol Newcastle couldn't get the three points, and the bot from Derby choked, how appropriate. Fun show, really would like another season.

Offline Badger

  • Permanent Artifact
  • Giga Heavyweight
  • Posts: 6318
  • Rep: 3
  • I wish to be with my people
  • Awards BOTM Winner Donated money for site hosting 2019
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #276 on: August 30, 2016, 12:56:53 AM »
n00b question, why do none of the bots (particularly spinners) use internal combustion engines for weapons rather than electric motors? Have electric motors gottrn to the point where they are more powerful at that weight? Or is it just the fear of overturning when flipped? Prohibited in the rules? 
also lol at most toxic guy around calling others out on this sh**
Google Drive with my newer bots

Offline R1885

  • *
  • Posts: 2127
  • Rep: 3
  • Forum shopping list generator.
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #277 on: August 30, 2016, 02:00:41 AM »
n00b question, why do none of the bots (particularly spinners) use internal combustion engines for weapons rather than electric motors? Have electric motors gottrn to the point where they are more powerful at that weight? Or is it just the fear of overturning when flipped? Prohibited in the rules?
Way too unreliable. They can just spontaneously die at any moment. Not to mention all the other components needed to make them run(Gas, gas tank, clutch, starter, etc.). They're just not worth it when lower power but far more reliable electric motors exist.

Offline ecolusian

  • care to spare a chromasome for this poor sperglord?
  • Middleweight
  • Posts: 335
  • Rep: 2
  • Keeping TRB in check since 2010
    • View Profile
    • Awards
  • See profile for gamer tags: Yes
  • Skype: charles.cornfield1
Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #278 on: August 30, 2016, 10:01:02 AM »
"Two things are infinite:the universe and human stupidity;and I\'m not sure about the universe" -Albert Einstein
*IF YOU ARE NEUTRAL IN THIS SIG BUSINESS PUT THIS IN YOUR SIG*

Offline cephalopod

Re: Robot Wars 2016 Discussion Thread
« Reply #279 on: August 30, 2016, 03:11:51 PM »
Afraid to say that I really disliked the final. I don't think Thor was a great wildcard, and it went on to be just dead weight in the head-to-heads, only because Pulsar decided to break down straight away...

I think the format needs changing. It ruined this grand final.

Yeah I've heard about your video...
bristol bot builders / two headed death flamingo / snappy robots
//
kindest and friendliest '13, '15, '16, '17 / favourite staff member '14, '15