This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mr. AS
7801
« on: July 12, 2011, 05:25:39 PM »
Greatest trolling EVAAR.
7802
« on: July 12, 2011, 04:17:39 PM »
I was just about to post this same exact video.
7803
« on: July 12, 2011, 04:01:34 PM »
Thanks, Vert. Not sure what to do with remaining weight
Extend the chassis a bit and upgrade the drive maybe? And/or use a small wedge on a snapper2/DDT.
7804
« on: July 12, 2011, 03:30:28 PM »
7805
« on: July 12, 2011, 01:11:08 PM »
GET ALONG NOW.
7806
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:58:16 AM »
I do not live in an alternate universe. I live in this town of the USA named Stillwater, Oklahoma with Enigma and rrrrrrrrrrhhh.
raep raep raep
Not needed, Sprinkles.
7807
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:39:14 AM »
 BTW, I never use 1/4 of the stuff on my desktop, like Roblox and Quicktime player.
7808
« on: July 11, 2011, 08:03:28 PM »
According to the RA2Wiki, E-Rupt, EMERGENCY, Spinner From the West, and Child's Play IV are already in the Hall of Fame.
7810
« on: July 09, 2011, 10:06:24 AM »
Nowadays, Sparks only acts up sometimes.
7811
« on: July 08, 2011, 10:23:23 PM »
Lets ban all glitches so RFS comes back because only he matters.
You just basically said that 30-70% of the community doesn't matter.
So is RFS a majority or minority?
I meant that the stock people are 30-70% of the community. I don't think that RFS played DSL.
7812
« on: July 08, 2011, 10:18:35 PM »
There is nothing to say this couldnt happen with AAM or BFE yes but I could see such an more accessible thing dramatically increasing the amount of Cheat vs Legit stacking.. [/quote] Lets ban all glitches so RFS comes back because only he matters.
You just basically said that 30-70% of the community doesn't matter. Many of you are looking at the wrong side of the "Stock Apocalypse"..
As I explained to Sage its this half baked messy situation we have now that could drive players away..
Once you have a clean simple cut rules we can go on peacefully with our lives again.. we basically have to come together as a community and make a simple agreement about it.
As it stands now Sage and Scrap can technically use it in existing rule sets as its not listed as an outlawed glitch and fits within the "All building to be done in the botlab"
Now obviously tournaments can make up their own personal rulesets around it but general building standards/ rules and the case if nothing is specified (or forgotten to add) its all up in the air.. Same with the 140cm extender.. tournaments make specific comments about it (becasue we never came to a yes or no agreement)
Why I mention this is remember Sage and I slipped in the 140cm extender in our winning BOTM? no rules prevented it as it fitted within the ruleset of AI / Hidden parts unless specified otherwise.. now its not a big deal but something like limitless stacking is.
We need to just come straight down to it and vote yes or no.. to many opinions and being changed and flying all over the place we really at not quite at the original point.
So lets just keep "ruin" "death" and "the end" out of this thread from no on and look at how we can structure this
1) Release and Allow- The Glitch is shown, Scrap is awarded it as an official glitch (at the moment it cannot be considered such since it cannot be confirmed 100% doable) and we let it loose in stock
2) Hide and Ban - Obviously the opposite, we pretend it didnt happen and use the "common sense approach" to stacks
3) Middle road - The Glitch is shown, Scrap is awarded it as an official glitch and baseplate stacking is banned.
Now I got some rage pm's from someone whom I wont mention about the stacking ban situation... but its basically to balance things out again. I foresee to many conflicts of people using Hax mode and claiming it legit (then we wind up with a tournament thread that turns into this one)... I mean if you dont go overboard with it you could easily pass boundaries without being detected
There is nothing to say this couldnt happen with AAM or BFE yes but I could see such an more accessible thing dramatically increasing the amount of Cheat vs Legit stacking..
I vote for 2.
7813
« on: July 08, 2011, 10:14:37 PM »
It's like 14.3 KG off HW or something.
Trim the chassis to reduce wieght then, or get rid of the piston <--- edit: no.
7814
« on: July 08, 2011, 09:56:07 PM »
Weight?
7815
« on: July 08, 2011, 08:15:16 PM »
I find GTG's cartoon funny only because of how terrible it is.
7816
« on: July 08, 2011, 05:17:08 PM »
Go to Google Images > Search for "Blue waffles" > ???? > Profit get grossed out.
Fixed
7818
« on: July 08, 2011, 02:33:40 PM »
Oh dear, that's not good - did you get it back?
I'd assume not. In the time that a balloon floats out of someone's reach, the temperature can't decrease from 80 degrees to 60 degrees.
7819
« on: July 08, 2011, 02:27:33 PM »
Trim the chassis down and switch the Supervolt for a Nifty That'll cause a low battery issue. , then you'll be able to get 9 maces on an extra 14 kg will NOT give me enough weight to do that, preferably by using extra extenders pointing down on the ends of the spinner or that either.
7820
« on: July 08, 2011, 02:07:09 PM »
  Low battery issue fixed.  Shakes A LOT if it's weapons are broken (Mauler dances) Physics-abusing Stimech Plastic armor
|
Show Posts