1761
Tournament Archives / Re: Robot Wars Series 8 - Videos (HEAT I SPLASH)
« on: July 07, 2012, 10:56:48 AM »Crazy Harry: Hartza69 (Mah dad)What? your dad entered? :P
|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1761
Tournament Archives / Re: Robot Wars Series 8 - Videos (HEAT I SPLASH)« on: July 07, 2012, 10:56:48 AM »Crazy Harry: Hartza69 (Mah dad)What? your dad entered? :P 1762
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: chrome is acting rude« on: July 07, 2012, 10:48:34 AM »
Well yeah, i bet all internet browsers have some kind of problems.
1763
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Enigma's Showcase« on: July 07, 2012, 10:46:05 AM »Stop being idiotic. There's no damn way anyone can build a 999999 kg bot with standard DSL.That was a joke.... 1764
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: chrome is acting rude« on: July 07, 2012, 10:45:08 AM »
Im using Firefox right now.... :P
1765
Existing Games / Re: Duke nukem forever« on: July 07, 2012, 10:41:46 AM »
DNF - Did not finish
......Wait, darn it did eventually finish. :P 1766
Off-Topic Discussion / Re: chrome is acting rude« on: July 07, 2012, 10:36:42 AM »
Use Firefox. :P
1767
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Enigma's Showcase« on: July 06, 2012, 08:16:12 AM »
GO FOR 9999999!!!
Edit: yeah, you can make a venko type bot. :P 1768
General Support / Re: Game Crashes when trying to goto fullscreen or change the Resolution?« on: July 05, 2012, 08:29:17 PM »
Shouldn't putting . in-between curse words be not allowed?
Wait, i think it already isn't allowed. 1769
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 05, 2012, 07:15:08 PM »It could actually end up being fairer if everyone could vote. The stupid people repping can have privileges removed, and any stupid repping will eventually be counterbalanced.YES 1770
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Enigma's Showcase« on: July 05, 2012, 03:50:15 PM »Oddly enough it only takes about 2 minutes for it to load in an arena.You must have a good computer or something. :P 1771
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Enigma's Showcase« on: July 05, 2012, 03:23:04 PM »
Lol, if that bot was on the computer im using it would probably crash... :P
1772
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Thyrus`Showcase« on: July 04, 2012, 08:43:10 AM »
Love the bot, Love the name. :)
1773
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 04, 2012, 08:42:13 AM »Reputation Law?.... Really?...... I mean Reeeeally?100% Agreed. 1774
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 04:15:46 PM »
I never said you gave him any.
1775
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 04:12:43 PM »
"Nonsense, rep should represent the quality of someones behaviour. FOTEPX has been posting more poorly recently anyway, especially when compare to Sage, who has has the same rep level as."
I know, but shouldn't it just have never been given to him instead of randomly taking it all away? if your wondering why im using the old fashion way of quoting instead of quote feature cause its not working for some dumb reason. run on sentence ftw 1776
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 03:58:19 PM »But that wouldn't be right, you have to have a good reason to rep someone down, and not just because it's too high.OPERATION DOWNVOTE FOTEPEX GOGOGOGOGOThe only person I can badmouth for having too much rep relative to his behavior is FOTEPX, who definitely does not deserve as much as Sage.I'm all good with having a rep system being based on posting quality.Yeah, that sounds good to me. Hopefully should cut down on the complete jerks having overinflated Reps and those who do post good stuff having very little. but however, if that was a joke just ignore me. 1777
Game Development / Re: Robot wars series 2 game« on: July 03, 2012, 03:51:48 PM »yes i will be finishing the game asap:D *gets all excited* 1778
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 03:49:27 PM »
I am one of the very few people that actually want the rep system. =)
Offtopic: WOOT! 400 posts! :P 1779
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 03:40:36 PM »Again, this goes with the point I made earlier about how reputation shouldn't be seen as RA2-related because it doesn't affect gameplay or how good or terrible a user is at building. It really is just a community thing, because because it's not robotic drones that give people rep or rep them down, it's said people in said community. Therefore, I don't believe it's an RA2 thing.Agreed. 1780
Chatterbox / Re: Reputation Law Discussion Thread« on: July 03, 2012, 03:29:30 PM »
Am i taken as active?
@GTG |