Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 090901

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 426
1081
Tournament Archives / Re: Wheely Tag Tournament II - SBV
« on: October 19, 2016, 04:20:26 AM »
me vs dsc vs geice vs redace
who gonna win

1082
General Support / Re: Component Texturing Help.
« on: October 18, 2016, 09:30:00 PM »
No compiler? Did you use this one?
Yeah. He provides a link to a list of versions and I don't know which one to use.
I mean, you usually use the newest version of things, don't you?

1083
DSL TC Showcases / Re: The Collins DSL Showcase
« on: October 17, 2016, 09:48:16 PM »
the wheelguards on pause  :rage

1084
DSL TC Showcases / Re: 090901's DSL showcase.
« on: October 17, 2016, 09:17:09 PM »
random trash



turrent hammer 1


turrent hammer 2

1085
Not really. Anyway, it's not in the rules, so it's not allowed.
Neither was RA2CF  ;)

1086
Stock Showcases / Re: Tales of RPJK's Stock Showcase: Levisomnus
« on: October 17, 2016, 04:33:45 PM »
its 50kg underweight and uses RADS. ATM its pretty much a crap drum. Why not make it a tribar gutripper like that one thing mechadino just made
because thats a totally different design.......?

1087
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Purse`s DSL Showcase
« on: October 17, 2016, 09:04:27 AM »
tbh If I was you I would lower the chassis height as much as I could via BFE so the spinning bar would have a better chance hitting/you can get better chassis armour since plastic 1 is a death sentence. You could use smaller wheels then which would let you line up the wheelguards better then.

1088
Tournament Archives / Re: Wild Card Rally-SBV
« on: October 17, 2016, 05:46:01 AM »



First of all, let me just cover my own tracks with your top statement and explain the supposed discrepancy: you're probably talking about the extender anchor at the top of the robot, keeping the blade pointing down. http://i.imgur.com/quvC58Z.png

1089
No component freedom? Why? (You can at least say 3 or 4 uses...)

1090
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Kurt's DSL Garage
« on: October 17, 2016, 01:02:55 AM »
Can we get a post in the thread from Kurt confirming rules on component freedom?
go for it bro

lern 2 reed

hey man it should be in the OP then  :dumb)

1091
Challenge Board / Re: Silly Rumble - Badger v 09 v Kix v Wen
« on: October 16, 2016, 10:37:51 PM »

1092
Tournament Archives / Re: Wild Card Rally-SBV
« on: October 16, 2016, 10:24:28 PM »
Ok yeah I'm totally leaning on it being a .gmf issue since the skin on Gulden's E-tek is the one from DSL 2.0 (The E-tek is different in DSL 2.0 from the one in 2.1), so I'm guessing Gulden just downloaded 2.0 and put 2.2 over it and never patched it with 2.1, which has the updated E-tek. (Or he didn't overwrite files when he installed 2.1 if he did)

So yeah, Gulden didn't try to screw you up in anyway, and this all could have been solved from the start if you actually said something back then.

And Gulden, go DL the full version of DSL 2.2 so issues like this can't happen again if you host another tourney.

1093
Tournament Archives / Re: Wild Card Rally-SBV
« on: October 16, 2016, 10:04:34 PM »
If you actually look at the match you can see the E-Tek axle facing downwards



Which means the only way Guldenflame could have "edited" your bot would have been to BFE the disc upwards, which I doubt he even know how to do, so I assume it's a AP problem in the .gmf file he had or something stupid like that.

Also, for whats it's worth, your bot would have lost way sooner if the disc wasn't on the top as it would have gotten instant KO'd by the hammers.

Plus I think it's retarded to make Gulden literally redo everything if the results of that match change simply because even though you saw your bot wasn't correct, you didn't say anything at all until that stupid Banter Wars drama came around.


tl;dr Both wakky and Gulden screwed up and are both at fault in a way this whole mess (wakky for seemingly being ok with whatever changes occurred because of Gulden having a screwed up game until the whole Banter Wars thing which then he decided to point out it was different instead of before and Gulden for having a screwed up game)

1094
DSL TC Showcases / Re: Kurt's DSL Garage
« on: October 16, 2016, 09:08:01 PM »
i'm impressed you managed to make these without RA2CF or BFE considering both are banned for your tourney

1095
MEME

1096
Tournament Archives / Re: Wild Card Rally-SBV
« on: October 15, 2016, 10:00:10 PM »
change the thumbnail, it spoils the match

1097
Something I have noticed about ironforge:

DSL makes everything heavy.

Ironforge Makes everything light.
Ironforge has self enforced weight limits that are half that or normal building so all the parts weights are halved

Ok.  I assume that the weight classes are still 0-250, 250-400, 400-600, and 600-800?
No.
LW is up to 125kg
MW is up to 200kg
CW is up to 300kg
HW is up to 400kg

1098
Something I have noticed about ironforge:

DSL makes everything heavy.

Ironforge Makes everything light.
Ironforge has self enforced weight limits that are half that or normal building so all the parts weights are halved

1099
why did you remove ironforge irl

better question is why bot just have a DSL or Ironforge poll and then a IRL or DSL S poll

1100
whoever is voting for IRL should sincerely end their lives. There's been like 37 IRL tournaments recently and no IF or DSL-S, what is your problem actually.

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 426