I'm not a wikipedian by any stretch, but it's reasonable to have a "serious" page and a "fun" page for the same topic.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/2016_U.S._Presidential_Electionhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:2016_U.S._Presidential_Election
Quote from: Dreamcast on April 14, 2017, 10:26:51 AMI'm not a wikipedian by any stretch, but it's reasonable to have a "serious" page and a "fun" page for the same topic.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/2016_U.S._Presidential_Electionhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:2016_U.S._Presidential_ElectionAgreed. That's what i'm doing with 09 (and hopefully all user) pagesHowever, the pages I have listed prior are the most important.
Quote from: Avalanche on April 14, 2017, 10:41:30 AMQuote from: Dreamcast on April 14, 2017, 10:26:51 AMI'm not a wikipedian by any stretch, but it's reasonable to have a "serious" page and a "fun" page for the same topic.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/2016_U.S._Presidential_Electionhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:2016_U.S._Presidential_ElectionAgreed. That's what i'm doing with 09 (and hopefully all user) pagesHowever, the pages I have listed prior are the most important.Does having two separate pages for each and every article not clog up the wiki and make it even more confusing for these supposed new users who want to learn from it?
Quote from: TheRoboteer on April 14, 2017, 11:10:23 AMQuote from: Avalanche on April 14, 2017, 10:41:30 AMQuote from: Dreamcast on April 14, 2017, 10:26:51 AMI'm not a wikipedian by any stretch, but it's reasonable to have a "serious" page and a "fun" page for the same topic.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/2016_U.S._Presidential_Electionhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:2016_U.S._Presidential_ElectionAgreed. That's what i'm doing with 09 (and hopefully all user) pagesHowever, the pages I have listed prior are the most important.Does having two separate pages for each and every article not clog up the wiki and make it even more confusing for these supposed new users who want to learn from it?Not every topic needs separate pages. There aren't even that many articles that could have multiple versions outside of user articles.
Sure. Do you mind seeing if you can help with the BOTM winners page?
Quote from: Avalanche on April 14, 2017, 05:14:06 AMSure. Do you mind seeing if you can help with the BOTM winners page?I was thinking I could extend some of the pages about the arenas. Would that be ok?
GTM isn't wholy [sic] memes, it's not meant to be pure memes and cancer.
Quote from: Avalanche on April 14, 2017, 09:42:59 AMGTM isn't wholy [sic] memes, it's not meant to be pure memes and cancer.(Image removed from quote.)
The funniest thing here is that this is the most use the wiki will ever see in its lifetime. itssarcasmplsnokillme :c
ON the RA2Wiki, IN Tournament wins, for BBEAMS 7, it said I won with CrappyUnIRLBoT, Number 1, Thats not what I entered, that was for a challenge, number 2, I did not WIN!!!!!, I was close to winning the Semi-Finals, But the flipper screwed me over, so I did not Win.There is some weird stuff on that wiki.
Wow, that was surprising.
Quote from: Asbestosstar on June 22, 2017, 03:44:42 PMWow, that was surprising.Technically, it isn't his win since 09 modified it.