Text Only | Text with Attachments

gametechmods

Off-Topic => Chatterbox => Topic started by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 06:43:36 AM

Title: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 06:43:36 AM: (http://i.imgur.com/Mk10Q.jpg)

Now we can badmouth him all we want because this thread has illegal content on it. HAHA JOEBLO THIS IS CP!
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 07:18:24 AM: I would lay off the Drugs
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Naryar on May 26, 2010, 07:21:15 AM: It's bad quality so it doesn't count
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Reier on May 26, 2010, 09:17:38 AM: What's with the illegal thing?
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 09:24:46 AM: I have no idea... nor why it concerns me
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 09:26:37 AM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#No_cartoon_depictions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#No_cartoon_depictions)
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Reier on May 26, 2010, 09:27:38 AM: I don't get it.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 09:37:32 AM: Quote
Also, in December 2008, a New South Wales Supreme Court judge, Justice Michael Adams (https://gametechmods.com/w/index.php?title=Justice_Michael_Adams&action=edit&redlink=1), ruled to uphold a magistrate's decision that a pornographic cartoon parodying characters on The Simpsons (https://gametechmods.com/wiki/The_Simpsons) (Bart (https://gametechmods.com/wiki/Bart_Simpson) & Lisa (https://gametechmods.com/wiki/Lisa_Simpson)) was child pornography, because "it follows that a fictional cartoon character, even one which departs from recognizable human forms in some significant respects, may nevertheless be the depiction of a person within the meaning of the Act."
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Reier on May 26, 2010, 09:37:52 AM: I don't get it.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 09:44:41 AM: Quote from: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 07:18:24 AM
I would lay off the Drugs
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 09:58:13 AM: Quote from: Reier on May 26, 2010, 09:37:52 AM
I don't get it.

the picture I posted is child porn in australia, dumb****.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Reier on May 26, 2010, 10:02:30 AM: Then you are dumb.
HEHEHHEHEHEHEHE get a life
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 10:13:26 AM: If I am dumb, you are dumber for not knowing, and joeblo is dumberer for now knowing a law passed in his own country.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 10:37:11 AM: Quote from: System32 on May 26, 2010, 10:13:26 AM
If I am dumb, you are dumber for not knowing, and joeblo is dumberer for now knowing a law passed in his own country.

ooo you english use good.

you should do something else constructive with your time rather then waste it on crap like this..
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 26, 2010, 10:38:49 AM: Quote from: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 10:37:11 AM
Quote from: System32 on May 26, 2010, 10:13:26 AM
If I am dumb, you are dumber for not knowing, and joeblo is dumberer for now knowing a law passed in his own country.
ooo you english use good.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ACPW_enGB359GB359&q=dumber+and+dumberer (http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ACPW_enGB359GB359&q=dumber+and+dumberer)
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Resetti's Replicas on May 26, 2010, 10:41:19 AM: This is illegal you know. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmQFcVR6vEs#)
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Viper89 on May 26, 2010, 07:05:06 PM: Quote from: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 07:18:24 AM
I would lay off the Drugs

haha pwned this whole thread. It's kind of funny that S32 took the time to actually make a thread like this, and the joke wasn't even funny lol.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: nicsan2009 on May 26, 2010, 07:09:12 PM: this is dumb
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: HurricaneAndrew on May 26, 2010, 09:25:43 PM: Tisk, tisk... Such failure.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 27, 2010, 01:16:52 AM: Quote from: Viper89 on May 26, 2010, 07:05:06 PM
Quote from: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 07:18:24 AM
I would lay off the Drugs

haha pwned this whole thread. It's kind of funny that S32 took the time to actually make a thread like this, and the joke wasn't even funny lol.

It wasn't a joke. JoeBlo is now in possesion of child porn, and we can get him to do anything we want. Like I planned.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Naryar on May 27, 2010, 07:32:44 AM: I personally think that joe's anti-troll defense is midly convincing here.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: JoeBlo on May 27, 2010, 09:42:13 AM: Quote from: Naryar on May 27, 2010, 07:32:44 AM
I personally think that joe's anti-troll defense is midly convincing here.

midly ?

my spell checker changed it to middy.... your on about booze again nary :P

Quote from: System32 on May 27, 2010, 01:16:52 AM
It wasn't a joke. JoeBlo is now in possesion of child porn, and we can get him to do anything we want. Like I planned.

but its on a website ? how is that possession ?
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: NFX on May 27, 2010, 10:41:56 AM: Quote from: System32 on May 27, 2010, 01:16:52 AM
Quote from: Viper89 on May 26, 2010, 07:05:06 PM
Quote from: JoeBlo on May 26, 2010, 07:18:24 AM
I would lay off the Drugs

haha pwned this whole thread. It's kind of funny that S32 took the time to actually make a thread like this, and the joke wasn't even funny lol.

It wasn't a joke. JoeBlo is now in possesion of child porn, and we can get him to do anything we want. Like I planned.

No he's not, it's the internet. If anyone's in possession of it, then you are. You're the one that posted it. Some might consider it planting evidence, I reckon.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: System32 on May 27, 2010, 11:50:09 AM: This is where the WTF factor of Australia gets epic.

You viewed it, therefore it's in your cache, Joe. As long as it's in your cache and history, (By Australian law) it's in YOUR possession.

To me, a Scot, and anyone not in that backwards country, it's a pic of a guy in a Lisa costume showing off his ass by accident. To you, Joe: It's child porn in YOUR possession.

Now finish backlash before I call the cops. (MWAHAHA)
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: frezal on May 27, 2010, 11:51:45 AM: I've been to ED, so I've seen much worse.
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Stagfish on May 27, 2010, 11:57:28 AM: I see what S32 is getting at but how does this relate to Joe except that he's Australian?
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: lloopp D lloopp on May 27, 2010, 02:07:30 PM: F-F-F-F-F-F-FAIL
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: Madiaba on May 27, 2010, 04:35:44 PM: Quote from: lloopp D lloopp on May 27, 2010, 02:07:30 PM
F-F-F-F-F-F-FAIL
Maybe...
S-32 has often started some good, witty threads... and this one was a 'set-up, then blame' prank on Joe, I can see. Not bad.
You guys need to look past S-32's hardness and you'll find his motive. It's done in jest....

@S-32 your wit is significant, IMO, but your harsh delivery tends to taint (misrepresent) your cool ideas... sending like 'mixed messages' ...leaving the hearer not knowing how to receive your thoughts. It tends to sabotage relationships, I know.... for I've seen the same in myself, and thus recognize it in others. What you do with it is up to you... just sharing.

---------------

Quote from: frezal on May 27, 2010, 11:51:45 AM
I've been to ED, so I've seen much worse.
ED?... As in 'See Alice"?
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: lloopp D lloopp on May 28, 2010, 11:21:35 AM: The first time I saw Goatse was on Encyclopedia Dramatica.

Uncyclopedia FTW!
Title: Re: This thread is illegal to JoeBlo
Post by: frezal on May 28, 2010, 12:02:29 PM: Quote from: lloopp D lloopp on May 28, 2010, 11:21:35 AM
The first time I saw Goatse was on Encyclopedia Dramatica.

Uncyclopedia FTW!
The first time I saw Goatse was on the old Robot Arena forums. I think it was DaStompa (TDS) who posted it.