im just waiting for meganerdbomb to come along and kick things into gear.
Heh, I knew a discussion about religion would bring frezal out of hiding.By the way, God never actually said he hates gay people; he just reeeally doesn't like them having sex.
For once the mods did something right
Quote from: Meganerdbomb on December 17, 2011, 07:56:56 PMHeh, I knew a discussion about religion would bring frezal out of hiding.By the way, God never actually said he hates gay people; he just reeeally doesn't like them having sex.Yeah, because he can't get any.
Quote from: frezal on December 18, 2011, 02:28:45 AMQuote from: Meganerdbomb on December 17, 2011, 07:56:56 PMHeh, I knew a discussion about religion would bring frezal out of hiding.By the way, God never actually said he hates gay people; he just reeeally doesn't like them having sex.Yeah, because he can't get any.You have a point. He hasn't fathered any children for at least 2000 years.
Quote from: Meganerdbomb on December 18, 2011, 02:34:07 AMQuote from: frezal on December 18, 2011, 02:28:45 AMQuote from: Meganerdbomb on December 17, 2011, 07:56:56 PMHeh, I knew a discussion about religion would bring frezal out of hiding.By the way, God never actually said he hates gay people; he just reeeally doesn't like them having sex.Yeah, because he can't get any.You have a point. He hasn't fathered any children for at least 2000 years.Even then, it was just him in disguise.
Now why is MNB defending the Bible; I wouldn't have pegged him for a Christian. Just playing devil's advocate? (Or God's advocate, as I suppose it would be in this case.) Also arguing about religion is pointless. We're all too set in our beliefs to be convinced one way or the other from posts on an internet forum. I will say I am Christian because there is plenty of evidence for God's love if you look with an open mind, and because existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless, and I'll leave it at that. Further elaboration would only turn into another pointless argument.
existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless, and I'll leave it at that.
existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless
Quote from: Clickbeetle on December 19, 2011, 12:29:27 AMexistence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaninglessPrecisely why I'm a theist. But all religions have those restraints on them that makes them all look really rather stupid if you take a step back from them. Which is why I don't really follow a proper religion, though me and Suzume used to have fun with his made up Pseudoshintotheism and he'd make up some really silly rule that we'd follow for a day and then ditch
I will say I am Christian because there is plenty of evidence for God's love if you look with an open mind, and because existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless, and I'll leave it at that. Further elaboration would only turn into another pointless argument.
Quote from: Clickbeetle on December 19, 2011, 12:29:27 AMI will say I am Christian because there is plenty of evidence for God's love if you look with an open mind, and because existence without God or heaven seems to me rather short, brutal, and utterly meaningless, and I'll leave it at that. Further elaboration would only turn into another pointless argument.Personally I have seen things that could lead to the BELIEF there is an all-powerful entity guarding us, but this doesn't mean I should accept it as empirical truth, because most of these aren't examined enough under the critical eye of reason, and there are also many things that can make MYSELF believe there is no such thing as a god as the Bible presents it.
Besides, that god you claim to exist should know that he should present itself unambiguously to humanity, if he is well-intentioned. I have not seen any irrefutable proof of God existing.
And you do not think that with an open mind, you can see existence without god or heaven as something different from being short, brutal and meaningless ?Short ? We're improving on that. Besides, biological immortality exists. Though it is certainly for very simple organisms, and it's sure going to be VERY HARD to reach, maybe we can reach that one day.
Brutal, not necessarily, as frezal said.
And meaningless... you deny the right of godless or heavenless human beings to give meaning to their life ? Or you do not accept an individual's right to give an individual meaning to it's life, accepting only the notion of meaning of life if they are shared by a large community, such as the whole of a religion ? That seems pretty gloomy and even tyrannical to me.
Also, this is not a pointless argument. This is about the nature of existence itself ! As you say that it is a pointless argument, you sound like you want to avoid a religion argument.