Author Topic: Sylandro's MANLY icons, or how to make a fool out of yourself (Read 898 times)

Sylandro · « **on:** April 20, 2013, 12:40:08 PM »

DISCALMER: These icons may be not really TOO manly for people under the age of 10, if you're under the age of 10, this is a good time to press the back button or leave this forum entirely.

Ahem. Look at the unfunny bullsh** I have produced, people.

WELCOME TO MY MANLY ICONS SHACK, THEY ARE 100% FREE!
FIRST UP, MANLY GUINEA PIG!

NOW, WE HAVE MANLY JONZU95.

AND NOW, WE HAVE MANLY BOMBAY CAT/KITTEN!

~~LAST, BUT NOT LEAST,~~ MANLY LASER MAN!

THIS IS MANLY ACAMS!

THIS IS NO TIME TO GET WARM INSIDE! THIS IS MANLY MAINE COON KITTEN!

What will come soon - more unfunny bullsh**

lol guise am I funny yet ? excsdee roflmao

Badger · « **Reply #1 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:41:15 PM »

Sylandro · « **Reply #2 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:42:39 PM »

Yes. I love unfunny bullsh** !

Jonzu95 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:44:33 PM »

I gotta admit, my avatar looks hilarious.

Naryar · « **Reply #4 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:45:27 PM »

no

this thread sucks

Sylandro · « **Reply #5 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:49:10 PM »

Quote from: Naryar on April 20, 2013, 12:45:27 PM

no

this thread sucks

Because you haven't said my avatars sucked yet.

Virus Bomb · « **Reply #6 on:** April 20, 2013, 12:49:27 PM »

If patience is worth anything, it must endure to the end of time. And a living faith will last in the midst of the blackest storm.

Jamin · « **Reply #7 on:** April 20, 2013, 01:37:48 PM »

get out

Naryar · « **Reply #8 on:** April 20, 2013, 01:42:49 PM »

no, no, no and no.

you are neither funny nor interesting nor manly.

get out.

Jamin · « **Reply #9 on:** April 20, 2013, 01:48:02 PM »

Virus Bomb · « **Reply #10 on:** April 20, 2013, 01:54:26 PM »

[movefast]

[/movefast]
[moveright]

[/moveright]
[movefast]

[/movefast]
[moveright]

[/moveright]
[movefast]

[/movefast]

Mr. AS · « **Reply #11 on:** April 20, 2013, 02:02:57 PM »

Naryar · « **Reply #12 on:** April 20, 2013, 02:07:46 PM »

this is not playground, before you ask

i am very tempted to move this thread to it though, just after some homemade modifications to OP

Sylandro · « **Reply #13 on:** April 20, 2013, 02:23:31 PM »

grgrtrgsdgqdhfgsfeyudgeyugy angry kid posting

Naryar · « **Reply #14 on:** April 20, 2013, 02:29:06 PM »

ok fine buddy

you asked for it

Naryar · « **Reply #15 on:** April 20, 2013, 02:33:42 PM »

edit done

wakkydude · « **Reply #16 on:** April 20, 2013, 03:42:32 PM »

TRY AND MAKE ME MANLY

I

DARE

YOU

Jamin · « **Reply #17 on:** April 20, 2013, 03:57:44 PM »

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success: the Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worth of being saved.
In a sense the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little attention to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as one can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for free for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply publicize what the music business wants to make money with.

J · « **Reply #18 on:** April 20, 2013, 07:46:18 PM »

So, TC, how would one go about making the tank in my signature look even manlier then it already is?

Probably Rob · « **Reply #19 on:** April 20, 2013, 07:51:51 PM »

Instead of making pictures, shouldn't you be fixing your tournament?